Advertisement

Noise diminution and formant extraction on vowels for hearing aid users

  • M. Vanitha Lakshmi
  • S. Sudha
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

People suffering from hearing loss have great difficulty to hear even with the help of hearing aids due to background noises. The problem of reducing noise in hearing aids still remains as a toughest problem to solve. A speech upgrade method to be specific, a modified spectral subtraction is proposed to decrease the different foundation noises and its execution is tried with target quality estimation parameter like signal to noise ratio (SNR) and perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ), and furthermore Vowels are thought to be voiced sounds with more vitality for discourse creation. And hence from the enhanced speech signal the formant frequency of the voiced vowels is extracted based on autocorrelation method and in future work thereby increase the intelligibility of the vowels by enhancing the formants for the hearing aid listeners.

Keywords

Hearing aid Modified spectral subtraction Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ) Speech enhancement Signal to noise ratio (SNR) Vowels and formant extraction 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    A Noisy Speech Corpus for Assessment of Speech enhancement Algorithms http://www.utdallas.edu/~Ioizou/speech/noizeus
  2. 2.
    Acoustical Solutions, Inc. Introduction to noise control, Acoustic EducationGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anitha Sheela K et al Spectral subtraction technique for speech enhancement - A Review, ICRACVES-2014, ISSN (Online):2349–0020, ISSN (Print): 2394–4544Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berouti M, Schwartz R, Makhoul J (1979) Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise. In: Processing of International Conference of Acoustic, Speech and signal Processing, pp. 208–211Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen I (2003) Noise Spectrum estimation in adverse environment: Improved minima controlled recursive averaging. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 11:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cohen I (2005) Senior member, relaxed statistical model for speech enhancement and a priori SNR estimation. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 13(5)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohen I, Berdugo B (2001) Speech Enhancement for non-stationary noise environments. Signal Process 81(11):2403–2418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhivya E, Justin J (2016) Performance evaluation of speech enhancement techniques using wavelets. Proceedings of International conference on soft computing systems, Advances in Intelligence and computing 397CTU, pp. 47–49Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Donoho DL (2015) Denoising by soft thresholding. IEEE Trans on Information Theory 41(3):613–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fry DB, Abramson AS, Eimas PD, Liberman AM (1962) The identification and discrimination of synthetic vowels. Lang Speech 5(4):171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Helmholtz HL (2009) On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music. Cambridge Univ. Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hu Y, Loizou PC (2003) A perceptually motivated approach for speech enhancement. IEEE Trans Audio, Speech and Language Processing 11:457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamrul Hasan MD, Salahuddin S, Rezwan Khan M (2004) A modified A priori SNR for speech enhancement using spectral subtraction rules. IEEE Signal Processing Letters (4)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kewley-Port D, Burkle TZ, Lee JH (2007) Contribution of consonant versus vowel information to sentence intelligibility for young normal hearing and elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Amer 122(4):2365–2375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuppusamy PG, Malini RRH (2012) An iterative and adaptive pixel wise maximum absolute difference (PMAD) based image filter for impulse noise removal. European Journal of Scientific ResearchGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parikh K, Loizou PC (2005) The influence of noise on vowel and consonant cues. J Acoust Soc Amer 118(6):3874–3888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parlak K, Moreno OG (2012) Applied speech enhancement in mobile communication acoustics: background noise elimination with filtering algorithms. LAP LAMBERT Academic PublishingGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rao A, Carney LH (2014) Speech enhancement for hearing loss based on vowel coding in auditory midbrain. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 61(7)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scalart P, Vieira-Filho J (1996) Speech enhancement based on a priori signal to noise estimation. In: Proceedings ICASSP, pp. 629–632Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Upadhyay N, Karmakar A (2013) An Improved Multi-Band Spectral subtraction Algorithm for Enhancing Speech in Various Noise Environments, International Conference on Design and Manufacturing, IConDM 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng2013.09.103
  21. 21.
    Zahorian SA, Jagharghi AJ (1993) Spectral-shape features versus formants as acoustic correlates for vowels. J Acoust Soc Amer 94(4):1966–1982CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.S.A Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia
  2. 2.SRM Easwari Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations