Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 78, Issue 23, pp 33435–33455 | Cite as

Collaboration networks of arab biomedical researchers

  • Mahmoud Al-AyyoubEmail author
  • Esra’a Alawneh
  • Yaser Jararweh
  • Mohammad Al-Smadi
  • Brij B. Gupta


Social networks (SN) consist of a set of actors and connections between them. A collaboration network (ColNet) is a special type of SN, in which the actors represent researchers and the link between them indicate that they have co-authored at least one paper. ColNet analysis reveals how researchers interact and behave. A wide range of applications can be based on such studies. The current works on ColNet usually focus on a specific domain/discipline, country/geographical region or time interval. In our study, we focus on one of the understudied regions (the Arab world), and present a novel study on the ColNet of researchers in this region. The domain of interest in our study is biomedicine. We construct, analyze, and study ColNet of biomedical researchers in the Arab world. We divide the region of interest (the Arab world) into four geographical regions and look into the evolution of ColNet of each region separately over time. Our analysis reveals that there is an increase in the number of both authors and publications over time, and that authors tend to work in increasingly larger groups rather than working individually, which is consistent with what is assumed about the nature of research in this field. Our analysis also reveals that a researcher’s productivity is correlated with the amount of change in his/her circle of collaborators over time. For example, researchers working in stable or fixed groups and researchers who have completely different research group every few years are not necessarily the most productive ones.


Social networks analysis Collaboration networks PubMed Arab researchers 



  1. 1.
    Al-Ayyoub M, Arkok B, Jararweh Y (2018) An extended study of collaboration networks of levantine biomedical researchers. J Ambient Intell Humanized Comput 9(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Al-Sadi A, Al-Ayyoub M (2018) Identifying influential positively perceived users in co-purchase networks. In: 2018 9th international conference on information and communication systems (ICICS). IEEE, pp 78–83Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alawneh E (2015) Collaboration networks of Arab biomedical researchers. Master’s thesis, Jordan University of Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Andrade MTT, Braga P, Carneiro TKG, Ribeiro NM, Moret MA, de Barros Pereira HB (2014) Contextualized analysis of social networks: collaboration in scientific communities. Social Networking 2014Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arkok B, Al-Ayyoub M, Jararweh Y, Alsmadi I, Benkhelifa E (2014) Collaboration networks of levantine biomedical researchers. In: 2014 IEEE/ACM 7th international conference on utility and cloud computing (UCC). IEEE, pp 658–663Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benckendorff P (2009) Themes and trends in Australian and New Zealand tourism research: a social network analysis of citations in two leading journals (1994–2007). J Hosp Tour Manag 16(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cotta C, Merelo JJ (2006) The complex network of ec authors. ACM SIGEVOlution 1(2):2–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Day MY, Shih SP, Chang W (2011) Understanding scientific collaboration with social network analysis. In: The 17th cross-strait conference on information and managementGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Nooy W, Mrvar A, Batagelj V (2011) Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek, vol 27. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ding Y (2011) Scientific collaboration and endorsement: network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. J Informetrics 5(1):187–203MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ghali N, Panda M, Hassanien AE, Abraham A, Snasel V (2012) Social networks analysis: Tools, measures and visualization. In: Computational social networks. Springer, pp 3–23Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guan J, Yan Y, Zhang JJ (2017) The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations. J Inform 11(2):407–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Horani M, Alsmadi A, Al-Ayyoub M, Jararweh Y (2018) Measuring user influence in a co-reviewer network. In: 2018 9th international conference on information and communication systems (ICICS). IEEE, pp 227–232Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hou H, Kretschmer H, Liu Z (2007) The structure of scientific collaboration networks in scientometrics. Scientometrics 75(2):189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu C, Racherla P (2008) Visual representation of knowledge networks: a social network analysis of hospitality research domain. Int J Hosp Manag 27(2):302–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kretschmer H (1994) Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics 30(1):363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar S, Rohani VA, Ratnavelu K (2014) International research collaborations of Asean nations in economics, 1979–2010. Scientometrics 101(1):847–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leskovec J, Adamic LA, Huberman BA (2007) The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Trans Web (TWEB) 1(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu X, Bollen J, Nelson ML, Van de Sompel H (2005) Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Inf Process Manag 41(6):1462–1480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lozano S, Rodríguez XP, Arenas A (2014) Atapuerca: evolution of scientific collaboration in an emergent large-scale research infrastructure. Scientometrics 98(2):1505–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luo M, Chang X, Li Z, Nie L, Hauptmann AG, Zheng Q (2017) Simple to complex cross-modal learning to rank. Comput Vis Image Underst 163:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Luukkonen T, Persson O, Sivertsen G (1992) Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Sci Technol Human Values 17(1):101–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ma Z, Chang X, Yang Y, Sebe N, Hauptmann AG (2017) The many shades of negativity. IEEE Trans Multimed 19(7):1558–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newman ME (2001a) Scientific collaboration networks. i. network construction and fundamental results. Phys Rev E 64(1):016,131MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Newman ME (2001b) The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98(2):404–409MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newman ME (2004) Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101(suppl 1):5200–5205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rabab’Ah A, Al-Ayyoub M, Shehab MA, Jararweh Y, Jansen BJ (2016) Using the panama papers to explore the financial networks of the Middle East. In: 2016 11th international conference for internet technology and secured transactions (ICITST). IEEE, pp 92–97Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ronda-Pupo GA, Pham T (2018) The evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks: the case of the strategic management journal. Scientometrics 116(1):363–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsvetovat M, Kouznetsov A (2011) Social network analysis for startups: finding connections on the social web. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Uddin S, Hossain L, Rasmussen K (2013) Network effects on scientific collaborations. PloS One 8(2):e57,546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vanni T, Mesa-Frias M, Sanchez-Garcia R, Roesler R, Schwartsmann G, Goldani MZ, Foss AM (2014) International scientific collaboration in hiv and hpv: a network analysis. PloS One 9(3):e93,376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yan E, Ding Y (2009) Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: a coauthorship network analysis. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 60(10):2107–2118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ye Q, Li T, Law R (2013) A coauthorship network analysis of tourism and hospitality research collaboration. J Hosp Tour Res 37(1):51–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan
  2. 2.National Institute of TechnologyKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations