Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 78, Issue 21, pp 30677–30706 | Cite as

Efficient interactive search for geo-tagged multimedia data

  • Jun Long
  • Lei Zhu
  • Chengyuan ZhangEmail author
  • Zhan Yang
  • Yunwu Lin
  • Ruipeng Chen
Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the advances in mobile computing and multimedia techniques, there are vast amount of multimedia data with geographical information collected in multifarious applications. In this paper, we propose a novel type of image search namedinteractive geo-tagged image search which aims to find out a set of images based on geographical proximity and similarity of visual content, as well as the preference of users. Existing approaches for spatial keyword query and geo-image query cannot address this problem effectively since they do not consider these three type of information together for query. In order to solve this challenge efficiently, we propose the definition of interactive top-k geo-tagged image query and then present a framework including candidate search stage , interaction stage and termination stage. To enhance the searching efficiency in a large-scale database, we propose the candidate search algorithm named GI-SUPER Search based on a new notion called superior relationship and GIR-Tree, a novel index structure. Furthermore, two candidate selection methods are proposed for learning the preferences of the user during the interaction. At last, the termination procedure and estimation procedure are introduced in brief. Experimental evaluation on real multimedia dataset demonstrates that our solution has a really high performance.

Keywords

Geo-tagged multimedia data Interactive query Top-k spatial search 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61702560, 61472450), the Key Research Program of Hunan Province(2016JC2018), project (2018JJ3691) of Science and Technology Plan of Hunan Province, and the Research and Innovation Project of Central South University Graduate Students (2018zzts177).

References

  1. 1.
    Andersen R, Chellapilla K (2009) Finding dense subgraphs with size bounds. In: Algorithms and models for the web-graph, 6th international workshop, WAW 2009. Barcelona, Spain, February 12-13, 2009. Proceedings, pp 25–37Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldberg AV (1984) Finding a maximum density subgraph. University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beckmann N, Kriegel H, Schneider R, Seeger B (1990) The r*-tree: an efficient and robust access method for points and rectangles. In: Proceedings of the 1990 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data. Atlantic City, NJ, May 23-25, 1990., pp 322–331Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bianchi-Berthouze N (2003) K-DIME: an affective image filtering system. IEEE MultiMedia 10(3): 103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bȯrzsȯnyi S, Kossmann D, Stocker K (2001) The skyline operator. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on data engineering, April 2-6, 2001, Heidelberg, Germany, pp 421–430Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao X, Cong G, Jensen CS, Ooi BC (2011) Collective spatial keyword querying. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD 2011, Athens, Greece, June 12-16, 2011, pp 373–384Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen L, Cong G, Cao X, Tan K (2015) Temporal spatial-keyword top-k publish/subscribe. In: 31st IEEE International conference on data engineering, ICDE 2015, Seoul, South Korea, April 13-17, 2015, pp 255–266Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Luo L, Yu J, Ma J (2016) Image retrieval based on image-to-class similarity. Pattern Recogn Lett 83:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chum O, Philbin J, Zisserman A (2008) Near duplicate image detection: min-hash and tf-idf weighting. In: Proceedings of the British machine vision conference 2008, Leeds, September 2008, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cong G, Jensen CS, Wu D (2009) Efficient retrieval of the top-k most relevant spatial web objects. PVLDB 2(1):337–348Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deng J, Berg AC, Li F (2011) Hierarchical semantic indexing for large scale image retrieval. In: The 24th IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR 2011, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 20-25 June 2011, pp 785–792Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Deng K, Li X, Lu J, Zhou X (2015) Best keyword cover search. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 27(1):61–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Douze M, Ramisa A, Schmid C (2011) Combining attributes and fisher vectors for efficient image retrieval. In: The 24th IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR 2011, Colorado Springs, CO, USA, 20-25 June 2011, pp 745–752Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felipe ID, Hristidis V, Rishe N (2008) Keyword search on spatial databases. In: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on data engineering, ICDE 2008, April 7-12, 2008, Cancu̇n, Mėxico, pp 656–665Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gallo G, Grigoriadis MD, Tarjan RE (1989) A fast parametric maximum flow algorithm and applications. SIAM J Comput 18(1):30–55MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gosselin PH, Cord M (2008) Active learning methods for interactive image retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 17(7):1200–1211MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guo T, Cao X, Cong G (2015) Efficient algorithms for answering the m-closest keywords query. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, May 31 - June 4, 2015, pp 405–418Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guttman A (1984) R-trees: a dynamic index structure for spatial searching. In: SIGMOD’84, Proceedings of annual meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, June 18-21, 1984, pp 47–57Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang Y, Liu Q, Zhang S, Metaxas DN (2010) Image retrieval via probabilistic hypergraph ranking. In: The Twenty-Third IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR 2010, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13-18 June 2010, pp 3376–3383Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang M, Liu A, Xiong N, Wang T, Vasilakos AV (2018) A low-latency communication scheme for mobile wireless sensor control systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern-SystGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ilyas IF, Beskales G, Soliman MA (2008) A survey of top-k query processing techniques in relational database systems. ACM Comput Surv 40(4):11:1–11:58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kamahara J, Nagamatsu T, Tanaka N (2012) Conjunctive ranking function using geographic distance and image distance for geotagged image retrieval. In: Proceedings of the ACM multimedia 2012 workshop on geotagging and its applications in multimedia, GeoMM@ACM Multimedia 2012. Nara, Japan, October 29, 2012, pp 9–14Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim G, Sigal L, Xing EP (2014) Joint summarization of large-scale collections of web images and videos for storyline reconstruction. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, CVPR 2014. Columbus, OH, USA, June 23-28, 2014, pp 4225–4232Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kitanovski I, Strezoski G, Dimitrovski I, Madjarov G, Loskovska S (2017) Multimodal medical image retrieval system. Multimed Tools Appl 76(2):2955–2978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li Y, Zhang Y, Tao C, Zhu H (2016) Content-based high-resolution remote sensing image retrieval via unsupervised feature learning and collaborative affinity metric fusion. Remote Sens 8(9):709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li Y, Bie R, Zhang C, Miao Z, Wang Y, Wang J, Wu H (2017) Optimized learning instance-based image retrieval. Multimed Tools Appl 76 (15):16749–16766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liu J, Huang Z, Chen L, Shen HT, Yan Z (2012) Discovering areas of interest with geo-tagged images and check-ins. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM multimedia conference, MM ’12, Nara, Japan, October 29 - November 02, 2012. pp 589–598.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2393347.2393429
  28. 28.
    Liu X, Liu Y, Liu A, Yang LT (2018) Defending on-off attacks using light probing messages in smart sensors for industrial communication systems. IEEE Trans Indus InfGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Long C, Wong RC, Wang K, Fu AW (2013) Collective spatial keyword queries: a distance owner-driven approach. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, SIGMOD 2013. New York, NY, USA, June 22-27, 2013, pp 689–700Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lowe DG (1999) Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: ICCV, pp 1150–1157Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lowe DG (2004) Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int J Comput Vis 60(2): 91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Memon MH, Li J, Memon I, Arain QA (2017) GEO matching regions: multiple regions of interests using content based image retrieval based on relative locations. Multimed Tools Appl 76(14):15377–15411.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-016-3834-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rasiwasia N, Pereira JC, Coviello E, Doyle G, Lanckriet GRG, Levy R, Vasconcelos N (2010) A new approach to cross-modal multimedia retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on multimedia 2010. Firenze, Italy, October 25-29, 2010, pp 251–260.  https://doi.org/10.1145/1873951.1873987
  34. 34.
    Rocha-Junior JB, Gkorgkas O, Jonassen S, Nørvåg K (2011) Efficient processing of top-k spatial keyword queries. In: Advances in spatial and temporal databases - 12th international symposium, SSTD 2011. Minneapolis, MN, USA, August 24-26, 2011, Proceedings, pp 205–222Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rocha-Junior JB, Nørvåg K (2012) Top-k spatial keyword queries on road networks. In: 15th International conference on extending database technology, EDBT ’12. Berlin, Germany, March 27-30, 2012, Proceedings, pp 168–179.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2247596.2247617
  36. 36.
    Singh S, Kumar P (2017) User specific context construction for personalized multimedia retrieval. In: Multimedia Tools Appl., vol 9, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sivic J, Zisserman A (2003) Video google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. In: 9th IEEE International conference on computer vision (ICCV 2003), 14-17 October 2003, Nice, France, pp 1470–1477Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Thomee B, Lew MS (2012) Interactive search in image retrieval: a survey. IJMIR 1(2):71–86Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang Y, Wu L (2018) Beyond low-rank representations: orthogonal clustering basis reconstruction with optimized graph structure for multi-view spectral clustering. Neural Netw 103:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang Y, Cheema MA, Lin X, Zhang Q (2013) Multi-manifold ranking: using multiple features for better image retrieval. In: Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining, 17th Pacific-Asia conference, PAKDD 2013. Gold Coast, Australia, April 14-17, 2013, Proceedings, Part II, pp 449–460Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Zhang Q (2013) Towards metric fusion on multi-view data: a cross-view based graph random walk approach. In: 22nd ACM International conference on information and knowledge management, CIKM’13. San Francisco, CA, USA, October 27 - November 1, 2013, pp 805–810Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Zhang Q, Wu L (2014) Shifting hypergraphs by probabilistic voting. In: Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining - 18th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2014. Tainan, Taiwan, May 13-16, 2014. Proceedings, Part II, pp 234–246Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Wu L, Zhang W, Zhang Q (2014) Exploiting correlation consensus: towards subspace clustering for multi-modal data. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on multimedia, MM ’14. Orlando, FL, USA, November 03 - 07, 2014, pp 981–984Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Wu L, Zhang W, Zhang Q (2015) LBMCH: learning bridging mapping for cross-modal hashing. In: Proceedings of the 38th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. Santiago, Chile, August 9-13, 2015, pp 999–1002Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Wu L, Zhang W, Zhang Q, Huang X (2015) Robust subspace clustering for multi-view data by exploiting correlation consensus. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(11):3939–3949MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Wu L, Zhang W (2015) Effective multi-query expansions: robust landmark retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM conference on multimedia conference, MM ’15. Brisbane, Australia, October 26 - 30, 2015, pp 79–88Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang Y, Zhang W, Wu L, Lin X, Fang M, Pan S (2016) Iterative views agreement: an iterative low-rank based structured optimization method to multi-view spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2016. New York, NY, USA, 9-15 July 2016, pp 2153–2159Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Wang Y, Lin X, Wu L, Zhang W (2017) Effective multi-query expansions: collaborative deep networks for robust landmark retrieval. IEEE Trans Image Process 26(3):1393–1404MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang Y, Zhang W, Wu L, Lin X, Zhao X (2017) Unsupervised metric fusion over multiview data by graph random walk-based cross-view diffusion. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 28(1):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Wang Y, Wu L, Lin X, Gao J (2018) Multiview spectral clustering via structured low-rank matrix factorization. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn SystGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wu L, Wang Y (2017) Robust hashing for multi-view data: jointly learning low-rank kernelized similarity consensus and hash functions. Image Vision Comput 57:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu L, Wang Y, Shepherd J (2013) Efficient image and tag co-ranking: a bregman divergence optimization method. In: ACM multimedia conference, MM ’13, Barcelona, Spain, October 21–25, 2013, pp 593–596Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wu L, Huang X, Zhang C, Shepherd J, Wang Y (2015) An efficient framework of bregman divergence optimization for co-ranking images and tags in a heterogeneous network. Multimed Tools Appl 74(15):5635–5660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wu L, Wang Y, Gao J, Li X (2018) Deep adaptive feature embedding with local sample distributions for person re-identification. Pattern Recogn 73:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wu L, Wang Y, Ge Z, Hu Q, Li X (2018) Structured deep hashing with convolutional neural networks for fast person re-identification. Comput Vis Image Underst 167:63–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wu L, Wang Y, Li X, Gao J (2018) Deep attention-based spatially recursive networks for fine-grained visual recognition. IEEE Trans CybernGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wu L, Wang Y, Li X, Gao J (2018) What-and-where to match: deep spatially multiplicative integration networks for person re-identification. Pattern Recogn 76:727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xie Y, Yu H, Hu R (2014) Multimodal information joint learning for geotagged image search. In: 2013 IEEE International conference on multimedia and expo workshops. Chengdu, China, July 14–18, 2014, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Yaegashi K, Yanai K (2010) Geotagged image recognition by combining three different kinds of geolocation features. In: Computer Vision - ACCV 2010 - 10th Asian conference on computer vision. Queenstown, New Zealand, November 8-12, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part II, pp 360–373Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yang Y, Nie F, Xu D, Luo J, Zhuang Y, Pan Y (2012) A multimedia retrieval framework based on semi-supervised ranking and relevance feedback. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(4):723–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zhang D, Chee YM, Mondal A, Tung AKH, Kitsuregawa M (2009) Keyword search in spatial databases: towards searching by document. In: Proceedings of the 25th international conference on data engineering, ICDE 2009, March 29 2009 - April 2 2009, Shanghai, China, pp 688–699Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zhang D, Tan K, Tung AKH (2013) Scalable top-k spatial keyword search. In: Joint 2013 EDBT/ICDT conferences, EDBT ’13 Proceedings. Genoa, Italy, March 18-22, 2013, pp 359–370Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhang C, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Lin X (2013) Inverted linear quadtree: efficient top k spatial keyword search. In: 29th IEEE International conference on data engineering, ICDE 2013. Brisbane, Australia, April 8-12, 2013, pp 901–912Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Zhang D, Chan C, Tan K (2014) Processing spatial keyword query as a top-k aggregation query. In: The 37th International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, SIGIR ’14. Gold Coast, QLD, Australia - July 06 - 11, 2014, pp 355–364Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zhang C, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Lin X (2016) Inverted linear quadtree: efficient top K spatial keyword search. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 28(7):1706–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhao S, Yao H, Yang Y, Zhang Y (2014) Affective image retrieval via multi-graph learning. In: Proceedings of the ACM international conference on multimedia, MM ’14. Orlando, FL, USA, November 03 - 07, 2014, pp 1025–1028Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Zhao P, Kuang X, Sheng VS, Xu J, Wu J, Cui Z (2015) Scalable top-k spatial image search on road networks. In: Database Systems for advanced applications - 20th international conference, DASFAA 2015. Hanoi, Vietnam, April 20-23, 2015, Proceedings, Part II, pp 379–396Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhu L, Shen J, Jin H, Zheng R, Xie L (2015) Content-based visual landmark search via multimodal hypergraph learning. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(12):2756–2769CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Science and EngineeringCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Big Data and Knowledge Engineering InstituteCentral South UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations