Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 78, Issue 2, pp 1757–1783 | Cite as

Gabor-based spectral domain automated notch-reject filter for quasi-periodic noise reduction from digital images

  • D. ChakrabortyEmail author
  • M. K. Tarafder
  • A. Banerjee
  • S. R. Bhadra Chaudhuri
Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

Well-organized restoration techniques for attenuating the impact of periodic/quasi-periodic noise structures from digital images is one of the significant research fields in modern days. These are encountered in various imagery applications like remote-sensing (satellite, aerial), the digitization of canvas paintings, etc. In this paper, a novel spectral domain algorithm for periodic/quasi-periodic de-noising has been presented where an Automated Notch-Reject Filter (ANRF) is lucratively used to remove unwanted periodic patterns from Gabor-transformed corrupted images. As an initial stage, the Low-Frequency Region (LFR) has been conserved ingeniously by finding squared spectral difference after representing the image spectrum as multiple populations. Thereafter, the contrast of any corrupted image spectrum has been increased using Gabor transform for making the noisy components more prominent. Then, an adaptive exponential thresholding procedure has been applied efficiently for detecting those noisy components. The final stage of our proposed algorithm is to filter out those noisy components properly where a novel adaptive notch-reject filter has been applied along with an automated control of filtering profile in proportion to different noise spectrum profile. The supremacy of our algorithm over other state-of-the-art algorithms has been productively established with the help of experimental results in terms of visual and statistical metrics.

Keywords

Periodic/quasi-periodic noise Multiple populations Gabor transform Exponential thresholding Noisy bitmap Automated notch-reject filter 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Aizenberg I, Butakoff C (2002) Non-linear frequency domain filter for quasi periodic noise removal. In: Proceeding of International TICSP Workshop on Spectra Methods and Multi-rate Signal Processing. TICSP Series, 17, pp 147–153Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aizenberg I, Butakoff C (2002) Frequency domain median-like filter for periodic and quasi-periodic noise removal. SPIE Proceedings of the Image Processing 4667:181–191Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aizenberg I, Butakoff C (2008) A windowed Gaussian notch filter for quasi-periodic noise removal. Image Vis Comput 26(10):1347–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Najjar YA, Soong DC (2012) Comparison of image quality assessment: PSNR, HVS, SSIM, UIQI. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 3(8):1–5 ISSN 2229-5518Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Castelli V, Bergman LD (2002) Image databases: search and retrieval of digital imagery. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang Y et al (2015) Anisotropic spectral-spatial total variation model for multispectral remote sensing image destriping. IEEE Trans Image Process 24(6):1852–1866MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang-Yanab C, Ji-Xiana Z, Zheng-Juna L (2008) Study on methods of noise reduction in a striped image. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVII:B6bGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cornelis B et al (2012) Digital canvas removal in paintings. Signal Process 92(4):1166–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Daugman JG (1980) Two-dimensional spectral analysis of cortical receptive field profiles. Vis Res 20(10):847–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Daugman JG (1985) Uncertainty relation for resolution in space, spatial frequency, and orientation optimized by two-dimensional visual cortical filters. JOSA A 2(7):1160–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Drigger R, Cox P, Edwards T (1999) Introduction to infrared and electro-optical system. Artech House, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fehrenbach J, Weiss P, Lorenzo C (2012) Variational algorithms to remove stationary noise: applications to microscopy imaging. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(10):4420–4430MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Feuerstein D, Kim HP, Martyn GB (2009) Practical methods for noise removal: applications to spikes, nonstationary quasi-periodic noise, and baseline drift. Anal Chem 81(12):4987–4994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2007) Digital image processing, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guttman N, Julesz B (1963) Lower limits of auditory periodicity analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 35(4):610–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hudhud GAA, Turner MJ (2005) Digital removal of power frequency artifacts using a Fourier space median filter. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 12(8):573–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ji Z et al (2006) Simple and efficient soft morphological filter in periodic noise reduction. In: TENCON 2006–2006 IEEE Region 10 Conference, IEEE, pp. 1–4Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ji TY et al (2007) Optimal soft morphological filter for periodic noise removal using a particle swarm optimiser with passive congregation. Signal Process 87(11):2799–2809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jing W, Liu DC (2010) 2-D FFT for periodic noise removal on strain image. International conference on bioinformatics and biomedical engineering, Chengdu, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kelcey J, Arko L (2012) Sensor correction of a 6-band multispectral imaging sensor for UAV remote sensing. Remote Sens 4:1462–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ketenci S, Gangal A (2012) Design of Gaussian star filter for reduction of periodic noise and quasi-periodic noise in gray level images. In: Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications (INISTA), IEEE, pp. 1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1109/INISTA.2012.6246937
  22. 22.
    Konstantinidis AC et al (2010) Optical characterisation of a CMOS active pixel sensor using periodic noise reduction techniques. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 620(2):549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koukou, V et al (2015) Dual energy method for breast imaging: a simulation study. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 1–8Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kumar V, Gupta P (2012) Importance of statistical measures in digital image processing. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering 2(8), ISSN 2250-2459Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marques O (2011) Practical image and video processing using MATLAB. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Milanfar P (2013) A tour of modern image filtering: new insights and methods, both practical and theoretical. IEEE Signal Process Mag 30:106–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moallem P, Behnampour M (2010) Adaptive Optimum Notch Filter for Periodic Noise Reduction in Digital Images. Amirkabir International Journal of Electrical & Electronics Engineering 42(1):1–7Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Moallem P et al (2015) A novel adaptive Gaussian restoration filter for reducing periodic noises in digital image. SIViP 9(5):1179–1191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rindfleisch TC et al (1971) Digital processing of the mariner 6 and 7 pictures. J Geophys Res 76(2):394–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saravanakumar S (2013) Removal of moiré pattern noise in images using median and gaussian filter. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research 2(2):380–385Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schowengerdt R (2006) Remote sensing: models and methods for image processing. Academic, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith RD (2012) Digital transmission systems, 3rd edn. Springer Science & Business Media, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Song M, Tao D, Chen C, Bu J, Yang Y (2013) Color-to-gray based on chance of happening preservation. Neurocomputing 119:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sugiura Y, Kawamura A, Aikawa N (2013) A comb filter with adaptive notch bandwidth for periodic noise reduction. In: Information, Communications and Signal Processing (ICICS) 2013 9th International Conference on IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sur F (2015) An a-contrario approach to quasi-periodic noise removal. In: International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), IEEE, pp. 3841–3845.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351524
  36. 36.
    Sur F, Grédiac M (2015) Automated removal of quasiperiodic noise using frequency domain statistics. Journal of Electronic Imaging 24(1):013003_1–013003_19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Varghese J Adaptive threshold based frequency domain filter for periodic noise reduction. AEU Int J Electron Commun 70(12):1692–1701Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Varghese J et al (2016) Laplacian-based frequency domain filter for the restoration of digital images corrupted by periodic noise. Can J Electr Comput Eng 39(2):82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Varghese J et al (2016) Fourier transform-based windowed adaptive switching minimum filter for reducing periodic noise from digital images. IET Image Process 10(9):646–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Vaseghi VS (2013) Advanced signal processing and digital noise reduction, 3rd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang Z et al (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):600–612MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang Y, Wang Z, Tao D, Zhuo S, Xu X, Pu S, Song M (2017) All Focus: patch-based video out-of-focus blur reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 27(9):1895–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Chakraborty
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. K. Tarafder
    • 1
  • A. Banerjee
    • 1
  • S. R. Bhadra Chaudhuri
    • 1
  1. 1.ETCIIESTHowrahIndia

Personalised recommendations