Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 77, Issue 24, pp 31855–31873 | Cite as

Geospatial analysis of terrain through optimized feature extraction and regression model with preserved convex region

  • N. Prabhakaran
  • S. S. Ramakrishnan
  • N. R. Shanker
Article
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, cat optimization algorithm for feature extraction in satellite image has been proposed. In cat optimization, cost function computes the pixel in the satellite image to preserve the boundary shape and avoid non-convex part of the contour of the image. However, the existing feature extraction optimization algorithm measures the distinct data framework and thematic information to insight land cover such as waterbody, urban and vegetation. The land cover is obtained from different optimized feature extraction algorithms never provide proper boundary shape and land feature. Furthermore, the proposed cat optimized algorithm distinguishes the inner, outer and extended boundary along with the land cover. The cat-optimised algorithm for low and high-resolution satellite image shows the better result of 85%, with the preserved convex region when compared with the existing feature extraction algorithm such as fuzzy and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).

Keywords

Cat optimization algorithm Particle swarm optimization Fuzzy shape model Boundary region Regression 

References

  1. 1.
    Bouzidi A, Essaid Riffi M (2014) Cat swarm optimization to solve job shop scheduling problem. Third IEEE International Colloquium in Information Science and Technology (CIST) 202–205Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen S, Tian Y (2015) Pyramid of spatial relatons for scene-level land use classification. IEEE Transactionson Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53(4):1947–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheng G, Han J, Guo L, Liu Z, Bu S, Ren J (2015) Effective and efficient midlevel visual elements-oriented land-use classification using VHR remote sensing images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 53(8):4238–4249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubey YK, Mushrif MM (2016) FCM clustering algorithms for segmentation of brain MR images. Advances in Fuzzy Systems.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3406406 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Espinoza-Molina D, Nikolaou C, Octavian Dumitru C, Bereta K, Koubarakis M, Schwarz G, MD (2015) Very-high-resolution SAR images and linked open data analytics based on ontologies. IEEE Journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remotesensing 8(4):1696–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luus FPS, Salmon BP, Van Den Bergh F, Maharaj BTJ (2015) Multiview deep learning for land-use classification. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 12(12):2448–2452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mekhalfi ML, Melgani F, Bazi Y, Alajlan N (2015) Land-use classification with compressive sensing multifeature fusion. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 12(10):2155–2159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papa JP, Papa LP, Pereira DR, Pisani RJ (2016) A Hyperheuristic approach for unsupervised land-cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 9(6):2333–2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Regniers O, Bombrun L, Lafon V, Germain C (2016) Supervised classification of very high resolution optical images using wavelet-based textural features. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 54(6):3722–3735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rozenstein O, Paz-Kagan T, Salbach C, Karnieli A (2014) Comparing the effect of preprocessing transformations on methods of land-use classification derived from spectral soil measurements. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 8(6):2393–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharafi Y, Khanesar MA, MT (2013) Discrete binary cat swarm optimization algorithm. 2013 3rd IEEE International Conference on Computer, Control and Communication (IC4)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shih HC, Stow DA, Weeks JR, Coulter LL (2016) Determining the type and starting time of land cover and land use change in southern Ghana based on discrete analysis of dense Landsat image time series. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 9(5):2064–2073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vakalopoulou M, Karantzalos K, Member S, Komodakis N, Paragios N (2016) Graph-based registration, change detection, and classification in very high resolution multitemporal remote sensing data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 9(7):2940–2951CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Prabhakaran
    • 1
  • S. S. Ramakrishnan
    • 2
  • N. R. Shanker
    • 3
  1. 1.Vel Tech High Tech Dr Rangarajan Dr Sakunthala Engineering CollegeAvadiChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Institute of Remote SensingAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Aalim Muhammed Salegh College of EngineeringChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations