Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 77, Issue 17, pp 22671–22688 | Cite as

Preliminary study on angiosperm genus classification by weight decay and combination of most abundant color index with fractional Fourier entropy

  • Yu-Dong Zhang
  • Junding Sun
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

In order to develop an efficient angiosperm-genus classification system, we first collected petal image of Hibiscus, Orchis, and Prunus, by digital camera, and remove the backgrounds by region-growing method. Next, we proposed a novel feature-extraction method, which combined most abundant color index (MACI) and introduced the fractional Fourier entropy (FRFE). Third, we submitted the 41 features to a single-hidden layer feedforward neural-network (SLFN), with weight decay (WD) to avoid overfitting. The 10 × 10-fold cross validation showed our method achieved an overall accuracy of 98.92%. Without weight decay, the overall accuracy decreased to 95.50%. Our experiments validated that optimal decay factor is 0.1, and optimal number of hidden neurons is 15. This proposed method is excellent. It performs better than six state-of-the-art approaches and AlexNet. The weight decay helps to enhance generalization of our classifier.

Keywords

Angiosperm genus Weight decay Classification Fractional fourier entropy Feature extraction Most abundant color index Color histogram Single-hidden layer feed-forward neural-network Petal image AlexNet 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20150983), Natural Science Foundation of China (61602250).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest involved in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdelali HA et al (2016) Fast and robust object tracking via accept-reject color histogram-based method. J Vis Commun Image Represent 34:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alves CT et al (2014) Antifungal activity of phenolic compounds identified in flowers from North Eastern Portugal against Candida species. Future Microbiol 9:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartrina I et al (2011) Cytokinin regulates the activity of reproductive meristems, flower organ size, ovule formation, and thus seed yield in arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 23:69–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhalke DG et al (2016) Automatic musical instrument classification using fractional fourier transform based- MFCC features and counter propagation neural network. J Intell Inf Syst 46:425–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cattani C, Rao R (2016) Tea category identification using a novel fractional fourier entropy and jaya algorithm. Entropy 18:77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chamberlain CJ (1961) Gymnosperms: structure and evolution. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen S et al (2015) Magnetic resonance brain image classification based on weighted-type fractional Fourier transform and nonparallel support vector machine. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 25:317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng K, Tan X (2014) Sparse representations based attribute learning for flower classification. Neurocomputing 145:416–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Connor P et al (2015) A biological mechanism for bayesian feature selection: weight decay and raising the LASSO. Neural Netw 67:121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elgamel SA (2016) Using empirical mode decomposition and fractional Fourier transform-segment filtering algorithm to suppress high-power interference in non-linear chirp radars. IET Radar Sonar Navig 10:892–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaxiola F et al (2016) Optimization of type-2 fuzzy weights in backpropagation learning for neural networks using GAs and PSO. Appl Soft Comput 38:860–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goulianas K et al (2016) An adaptive learning rate backpropagation-type neural network for solving n x n systems on nonlinear algebraic equations. Math Meth Appl Sci 39:2602–2616MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grzeszczuk M et al (2016) Biological value of various edible flower species. Acta Sci Pol-Hortorum Cultus 15:109–119Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guru DS et al (2010) Texture features and KNN in classification of flower images. Int J Comput Appl S1:21–29Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Guru DS et al (2011) Textural features in flower classification. Math Comput Model 54:1030–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ji G (2014) Fruit classification using computer vision and feedforward neural network. J. Food Eng 143:167–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang P, Chen JJ (2016) Displacement prediction of landslide based on generalized regression neural networks with K-fold cross-validation. Neurocomputing 198:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laber EB, Murphy SA (2011) Adaptive confidence intervals for the test error in classification. J Am Stat Assoc 106:904–913MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee HH et al (2015) Mobile-based flower species recognition in the natural environment. Electron Lett 51:2Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leung ACS et al (2012) Decouple implementation of weight decay for recursive least square. Neural Comput & Applic 21:1709–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maparyan L (2016) Seeds of light, flowers of power, fruits of change ecowomanism as spiritualized ecological praxis. Worldviews 20:48–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nilsback ME, Zisserman A (2006) A visual vocabulary for flower classification. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06), IEEE, pp 1447–1454Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nilsback ME, Zisserman A (2008) Automated flower classification over a large number of classes. In: Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, IEEE, pp 722–729Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pacifico LDS, Ludermir TB (2012) Improved group search optimization based on opposite populations for feedforward networks training with weight decay. In: International Conference on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics, IEEE, Seoul, pp 474–479Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pwasong A, Sathasivam S (2016) A new hybrid quadratic regression and cascade forward backpropagation neural network. Neurocomputing 182:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rudall PJ et al (2009) Nonflowers near the base of extant angiosperms? spatiotemporal arrangement of organs in reproductive units of hydatellaceae and its bearing on the origin of the flower. Am J Bot 96:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rundo L et al (2016) Combining split-and-merge and multi-seed region growing algorithms for uterine fibroid segmentation in MRgFUS treatments. Med Biol Eng Comput 54:1071–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saitoh T, et al (2004) Automatic recognition of blooming flowers. In: 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE, Cambridge, pp 27–30Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sambamurty AVSS (2010) Taxonomy of angiosperms. I.K. International Publishing House Pvt. Limited, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sari YA, Suciati N (2014) Flower classification using combined a*b*Color and dractal-based texture feature. Int J Hybrid Inf Technol 7:357–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sasaki K, Ohtsubo N (2016) Promotion of Efficient Molecular Breeding Using Chimeric Repressors in Ornamental Flowers. Jarq - Jpn Agric Res Q 50:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Spyropoulos A, Mordohai P (2016) Correctness prediction, accuracy improvement and generalization of stereo matching using supervised learning. Int J Comput Vis 118:300–318MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stemplewski S, Polewski M (2016) Computer-aided diagnosis system with backpropagation artificial neural network-improving human readers performance. In: Wilimowska Z, Borzemski L, Grzech A, Swiatek J (eds) Information Systems Architecture And Technology, vol. 432. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin, pp 197–205Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sun Y (2016) A multilayer perceptron based smart pathological brain detection system by fractional fourier entropy. J Med Syst 40:173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vasudevan H et al (2015) Delaunay triangulation on skeleton of flowers for classification. Procedia Computer Science 45:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yang J (2015) Identification of green, oolong and black teas in China via wavelet packet entropy and fuzzy support vector machine. Entropy 17:6663–6682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang X et al (2015) Pathological brain detection by a novel image feature—fractional fourier entropy. Entropy 17:8278–8296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yeh IC et al (2012) Minimum risk neural networks and weight decay technique. In: Huang DS, Gupta P, Zhang X, Premaratne P (eds) Emerging Intelligent Computing Technology And Applications, vol. 304. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Berlin, pp 10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Yuan ZW, Zhang J (2016) Feature extraction and image retrieval based on AlexNet. Proc SPIE 10033:100330EGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and TechnologyHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuoPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Translational Imaging Division & MRI UnitColumbia University and New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of InformaticsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations