Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 76, Issue 24, pp 26103–26127 | Cite as

Privacy aware group based recommender system in multimedia services

  • Ahmed M. Elmisery
  • Seungmin Rho
  • Mirela Sertovic
  • Karima Boudaoud
  • Sanghyun Seo
Article

Abstract

Recommending similar-interest users’ groups in multimedia services is the problem of detecting for each registered user his/her membership to one interest-group of relevant consumers. The consumers in each interest-group share some relevant preferences which guarantee that the interest-group as a whole satisfies some desired properties of similarity. As a result, forming these interest-groups requires the availability of personal data of different consumers. This is a crucial requirement for different recommender systems. With the increasing trend of service providers to collect a large volume of personal data regarding their end-users, presumably to better serve them. However, a significant part of the data that is typically collected is not essential to the service being offered, or to the completion of the services it was presumably released for. Gathering such unnecessary data can be seen as a privacy threat, and storing it exposes the end-users to further unavoidable risks. In this paper, a privacy aware group based recommender system is proposed for the automated discovery of appropriate interest groups in multimedia services. A fog based middleware (FMCP) was introduced that runs at end-users’ sides and allows exchanging of their information to facilities recommending and creating interest-groups without disclosing their real preferences to other consumers. The membership of consumers in various interest groups allows receiving highly appropriate and reliable multimedia content-related advices. The system utilizes two protocols to attain this goal. Experiments were performed on real dataset.

Keywords

Multimedia services Privacy aware services Recommender services 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially financed by the “Dirección General de Investigación, Innovación y Postgrado” of Federico Santa María Technical University- Chile, in the project Security in Cyber-Physical Systems for Power Grids (UTFSM-DGIP PI.L.17.15), and by the Microsoft Azure for Research Grant (0518798) and by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2013R1A1A2061978)

References

  1. 1.
    Aimeur E, Brassard G, Fernandez JM, Onana FSM, Rakowski Z Experimental demonstration of a hybrid privacy-preserving recommender system. 161–170Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsmirat MA, Jararweh Y, Obaidat I, Gupta BB (2016) Internet of surveillance: a cloud supported large-scale wireless surveillance system. J Supercomput 1–20Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beil F, Ester M, Xu X (2002) Frequent term-based text clustering. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, p 436–442Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Canny J Collaborative filtering with privacy. 45–57Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheung DW, Han J, Ng VT, Fu AW, Fu Y (1996) A fast distributed algorithm for mining association rules. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on on Parallel and distributed information systems, Miami Beach, Florida, United States, p 31–43Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cuesta-Frau D, Pérez-Cortés JC, Andreu-García G (2003) Clustering of electrocardiograph signals in computer-aided Holter analysis. Comput Methods Prog Biomed 72(3):179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elmisery AM (2014) Private personalized social recommendations in an IPTV system. New Rev Hypermedia M 20(2):145–167. doi: 10.1080/13614568.2014.889222
  8. 8.
    Elmisery AM, Botvich D (2011) Enhanced middleware for collaborative privacy in IPTV recommender services. J Convergence 2(2):10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Elmisery AM, Botvich D (2011) An Agent Based Middleware for Privacy Aware Recommender Systems in IPTV Networks. In: Watada J, Phillips-Wren G, Jain LC, Howlett RJ (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Decision Technologies (IDT’ 2011). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 821–832. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-22194-1_81
  10. 10.
    Elmisery AM, Botvich D (2012) Agent based middleware for maintaining user privacy in IPTV recommender services. In: Prasad R, Farkas K, Schmidt AU, Lioy A, Russello G, Luccio FL (eds) Security and privacy in mobile information and communication systems: third international ICST conference, MobiSec 2011, Aalborg, Denmark, May 17-19, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 64–75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-30244-2_6
  11. 11.
    Elmisery AM, Botvich D Privacy aware recommender service for IPTV networks. 160–166. doi: 10.1109/MUE.2011.70
  12. 12.
    Elmisery AM, Doolin K, Botvich D (2012) Privacy aware community based recommender service for conferences attendees. IOS press.  doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-105-2-519
  13. 13.
    A. M. Elmisery, S. Rho and D. Botvich (2016) A Fog Based Middleware for Automated Compliance With OECD Privacy Principles in Internet of Healthcare Things. IEEE Access, vol. 4, no. , pp. 8418-8441. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2631546 
  14. 14.
    Elmisery AM, Rho S, Botvich D (2015) Privacy-enhanced middleware for location-based sub-community discovery in implicit social groups. J Supercomput 72(1):247–274. ​doi: 10.1007/s11227-015-1574-x
  15. 15.
    Elmisery AM, Rho S, Botvich D (2016) Collaborative privacy framework for minimizing privacy risks in an IPTV social recommender service. Multimed Tools Appl 75(22):14927–14957. ​doi: 10.1007/s11042-014-2271-0
  16. 16.
    Elmisery AM, Doolin K, Roussaki I, Botvich D Enhanced Middleware for Collaborative Privacy in Community Based Recommendations Services. In: Yeo S-S, Pan Y, Lee SY, Chang BH (eds) Computer Science and its Applications: CSA 2012, vol 2012, Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands, pp 313–328. ​doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-5699-1_32
  17. 17.
    Fung BCM (2002) Hierarchical document clustering using frequent item sets. Master’s Thesis, Simon Fraser UniversityGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    He J, Chu WW, Liu ZV Inferring privacy information from social networks. 154–165Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hofmann T, Hartmann D Collaborative filtering with privacy via factor analysis. 791–795Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang Z, Du W, Chen B (2005) Deriving private information from randomized data. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, Baltimore, Maryland, p 37–48Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kargupta H, Datta S, Wang Q, Sivakumar K (2003) On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, p 99Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim HD (2009) Applying Consistency-Based Trust Definition to Collaborative Filtering. KSII Trans Internet Inf Syst 3(4):366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Koutsabasis P, Stavrakis M, Viorres N, Darzentas JS, Spyrou T, Darzentas J (2008) A descriptive reference framework for the personalisation of e-business applications. Electron Commer Res 8(3):173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Loureiro S, Molva R, Pannetrat A (2001) Secure Data Collection with Updates. Electron Commer Res 1(1):119–130CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McSherry F, Mironov I Differentially private recommender systems: building privacy into the net. 627–636Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller BN, Konstan JA, Riedl J (2004) PocketLens: Toward a personal recommender system. ACM Trans Inf Syst 22(3):437–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mohamed Khamis Elmesiry A (2014) Machine learning based stochastic techniques for collaborative privacy in social recommender services. Waterford Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perik E., De Ruyter B, Markopoulos P, Eggen B The sensitivities of user profile information in music recommender systemsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Perik E, de Ruyter B, Markopoulos P Privacy & personalization: preliminary results of an empirical study of disclosure behaviorGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Polat H, Du W (2003) Privacy-preserving collaborative filtering using randomized perturbation techniques. In: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, p 625Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rubinstein IS (2011) Regulating privacy by design. Berkeley Technol Law J 26(3):1409–1456Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sebastiani F (2002) Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Comput Surv 34(1):1–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    I. Union (2005) The internet of things. ITU internet reports. International Telecommunication UnionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronic EngineeringUniversidad Tecnica Federico Santa MariaValparaisoChile
  2. 2.Department of Media SoftwareSungkyul UniversityAnyang-siSouth Korea
  3. 3.Filozofski fakultet u ZagrebuSveučilište u ZagrebuZagrebRepublika Hrvatska
  4. 4.Laboratoire d’Informatique, Signaux, et Systèmes de Sophia-Antipolis (I3S) / Equipe RAINBOWSophia-AntipolisFrance

Personalised recommendations