Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 8131–8144 | Cite as

A modified LOT model for image denoising



In image processing, it is often desirable to remove the noise and preserve image features. Due to the strong edge preserving ability, the total variation (TV) based regularization has been widely studied. However, it produces undesirable staircase effect. To alleviate the staircase effect, the LOT model proposed by Lysaker et al. (IEEE Trans Image Process 13(10): 1345–1357, 2004) has been studied, which is called the two-step method. After that, this method has started to appear as one of the more effective methods for image denoising, which includes two energy functions: one is about the normal field, the other is about the reconstruction image using the normal field obtained in the first step. However, the smoothed normal field is only related to the original noisy image in the first step, which is not enough. In this paper, we proposed a modified LOT model for image denoising, which lets the reconstruction vector field be related to the restored image. In addition, to compute the new model, we design a relaxed alternative direction method. The numerical experiments show that the new model can obtain the better results compared with some state-of-the art methods.


Image denoising Total variation Staircase effect Primal-dual method 


  1. 1.
    Bredies K, Kunisch K, Pock T (2010) Total generalized variation. SIAM J Imaging Sci 3(3):492–526MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chambolle A, Pock T (2011) A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging. J Math Imaging Vis 40(1):120–145MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chatterjee P, Peyman M (2012) Patch-based near-optimal image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(4):1635–1649MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen DQ, Cheng LZ, Su F (2012) A new TV-Stokes model with augmented Lagrangian method for image denoising and deconvolution. J Sci Comput 51:505–526MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dong FF, Liu Z, Kong DX, Liu KF (2009) An improved LOT model for image restoration. J Math Imaging Vis 34:89–97MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hahn J, Tai XC, Borok S, Bruckstein A (2011) Orientation-matching minimization for image denoising and inpainting. Int J Comput Vis 92(3):308–324MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hahn J, Wu CL, Tai XC (2012) Augmented Lagrangian method for generalized TV-Stokes model. J Sci Comput 50:235–264MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hajiaboli MR (2011) An anisotropic fourth-order diffusion filter for image noise removal. Int J Comput Vis 92:177–191MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hao Y, Xu J, Bai J (2014) Primal-dual method for the coupled variational model. Comput Electr Eng 40:808–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Litvinov W, Rahman T, Tai XC (2011) A modified TV-Stokes model for image processing. SIAM J Sci Comput 33(4):1574–1597MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lysaker M, Lundervold A, Tai XC (2003) Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equation with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time. IEEE Trans Image Process 12(12):1579–1589CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lysaker M, Osher S, Tai XC (2004) Noise removal using smoothed normals and surface fitting. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(10):1345–1357MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahman T, Tai XC, Osher S (2007) A TV-stokes denoising algorithm. In: Scale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision (SSVM), Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 473–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rajwade A, Anand R, Adrish B (2013) Image denoising using the higher order singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(4):849–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rudin L, Osher S, Fatemi E (1992) Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys D 60:259–268MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H, Simoncelli E (2004) Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process 13(4):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu TT, Yang YF, Jing HC (2014) Two-step methods for image zooming using duality strategies. Numer Algebra Control Optim 4(3):209–225MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xu JL, Feng XC, Hao Y et al (2014) Adaptive variational models for image decomposition. Sci China Inf Sci 57:1–8MATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Xu JL, Feng XC, Hao Y (2014) A coupled variational model for image denoising using a duality strategy and split Bregman. Multimid Syst Sign Process 25:83–94CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu JL, Feng XC, Hao Y et al (2014) Image decomposition and staircase effect reduction based on total generalized variation. J Syst Eng Electron 25:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yan RM, Ling S, Yan L (2013) Nonlocal hierarchical dictionary learning using wavelets for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process 22(12):4689–4698MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang YF, Pang ZF, Shi BL, Wang ZG (2011) Split Bregman method for the modified LOT model in image denoising. Appl Math Comput 217(12):5392–5403MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    You YL, Kaveh M (2000) Fourth-order partial differential equations for noise removal. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(10):1723–1730MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang XB, Feng XC (2015) Image denoising using local adaptive layered Wiener filter in the gradient domain. Multimed Tools Appl. doi:10.1007/s11042-014-2182-0 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematics and StatisticsHenan University of Science and TechnologyLuoyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations