Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 76, Issue 6, pp 7677–7698 | Cite as

A secure image sharing scheme with high quality stego-images based on steganography

Article
  • 270 Downloads

Abstract

Image sharing can be utilized to protect important commercial, military or private images against a single point of failure. Many existing image sharing schemes may have one or more of the security weaknesses as follows: First, noise-like image shares may easily arouse the attackers’ attention; Second, cheating in the recovery of the secret image cannot be prevented effectively; Third, the requisite size of cover images may be very large; Finally, poor quality of the stego-images may lessen camouflage effects. In this paper, a novel secure image sharing scheme with high quality stego-images is proposed. With the use of LOCO-I compression as a preprocessing approach, the statistical correlations between neighboring pixels of a secret image drop significantly, which may greatly enhance the visual security of the proposed scheme. And the necessary size of cover images is reduced. Moreover, the PSNR values of stego-images are much higher than the related works. In order to detect three kinds of deception during secret image reconstruction, the hash-based message authentication codes of an image share, the value of argument x and the identity ID of a participant are embedded into a cover image together with the image share. In addition, the application of dynamic embedding with a random strategy further enhance the security of our scheme.

Keywords

Image sharing Steganography LOCO-I compression Message authentication code Dynamic embedding 

References

  1. 1.
    Alvarez G, Hernández Encinas L, Martín del Rey A (2008) A multisecret sharing scheme for color images based on cellular automata. Inf Sci 178(22):4382–4395. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2008.07.010 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blakley G (1979) Safeguarding cryptographic keys. In: Proceedings of national computer conference (AFIPS1979), vol 48, pp 313–317Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chan CK, Cheng LM (2004) Hiding data in images by simple LSB substitution. Pattern Recogn 37(3):469–474CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chan CS, Sung PE (2010) Secret image sharing with steganography and authentication using dynamic programming strategy. In: First International Conference on Pervasive Computing Signal Processing and Applications (PCSPA), pp 382–385. doi:10.1109/PCSPA.2010.98
  5. 5.
    Chan CS, Lin CY, Lin YH (2012) Apply the modulus function to secret image sharing. International Journal of Innovative Computing Information and Control 8(1A):375–385Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chang CC, Hsieh YP, Lin CH (2008) Sharing secrets in stego images with authentication. Pattern Recogn 41(10):3130–3137CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen CC, Wu WJ, Chen JL (2015) Highly efficient and secure multi-secret image sharing scheme. Multimedia Tools and Applications:1–16Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eslami Z, Ahmadabadi J (2011) Secret image sharing with authentication-chaining and dynamic embedding. J Syst Softw 84(5):803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gloe T, Bhme R (2010) The ‘Dresden Image Database’ for benchmarking digital image forensics. In: Proceedings of the 25th symposium on applied computing (ACM SAC 2010), vol 2, pp 1585–1591Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo C, Chang CC, Qin C (2012) A hierarchical threshold secret image sharing. Pattern Recogn Lett 33(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsieh SL, Tsai IJ, Yeh CP, Chang CM (2011) An image authentication scheme based on digital watermarking and image secret sharing. Multimedia Tools and Applications 52(2–3):597–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Islam N, Puech W, Hayat K, Brouzet R (2011) Application of homomorphism to secure image sharing. Opt Commun 284(19):4412–4429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jin J, hong Wu Z (2012) A secret image sharing based on neighborhood configurations of 2-D cellular automata. Opt Laser Technol 44(3):538–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khosravi M, Naghsh-Nilchi A (2014) A novel joint secret image sharing and robust steganography method using wavelet. Multimedia Systems 20(2):215–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lee CW, Tsai WH (2012) A secret-sharing-based method for authentication of grayscale document images via the use of the PNG image with a data repair capability. IEEE Trans Image Process 21(1):207–218MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li P, Kong Q, Ma Y (2014) Image secret sharing and hiding with authentication based on PSNR estimation. Journal of Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing 5(3):353–366Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin CC, Tsai WH (2004) Secret image sharing with steganography and authentication. J Syst Softw 7(3):405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lin PY, Chang CC (2011) Cheating resistance and reversibility-oriented secret sharing mechanism. IET Inf Secur 5(2):81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naor M, Shamir A (1995) Visual cryptography. In: Advances in cryptology - EUROCRYPT’94, Perugia, Italy, LNCS, vol 950, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shamir A (1979) How to share a secret. Commun ACM 22(11):612–613MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thien CC, Lin JC (2002) Secret image sharing. Comput Graph 26(5):765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ulutas G, Ulutas M, Nabiyev VV (2013) Secret image sharing scheme with adaptive authentication strength. Pattern Recogn Lett 34(3):283–291CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang RZ, Su CH (2006) Secret image sharing with smaller shadow images. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(6):551–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Weinberger M, Seroussi G, Sapiro G (2000) The LOCO-i lossless image compression algorithm: Principles and standardization into JPEG-LS. IEEE Trans Image Process 9(8):1309–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu CC, Kao SJ, Kuo WC, Hwang MS (2008) Enhance the image sharing with steganography and authentication. In: Proceedings of international conference on intelligent information hiding and multimedia signal processing (IIHMSP’08). Harbin, China, pp 1177–1181Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang CN, Chu YY (2011) A general (k, n) scalable secret image sharing scheme with the smooth scalability. J Syst Softw 84(10):1726–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yang CN, Chen TS, Yua KH, Wang CC (2007) Improvements of image sharing with steganography and authentication. J Syst Softw 80(7):1070–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yuan HD (2014) Secret sharing with multi-cover adaptive steganography. Inf Sci 254:197–212MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringSouth China University of Technology, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega CentreGuangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations