Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 75, Issue 22, pp 14307–14328 | Cite as

QoS constraints-based energy-efficient model in cloud computing networks for multimedia clinical issues

  • Dingde Jiang
  • Lei Shi
  • Peng Zhang
  • Xiongzi Ge
Article

Abstract

For many applications of multimedia medical devices in clinical and medical issues, cloud computing becomes a very useful way. However, high energy consumption of cloud computing networks for these applications brings forth a large challenge. This paper studies the energy-efficient problem with QoS constraints in large-scale cloud computing networks. We use the sleeping and rate scaling mechanism to propose a link energy consumption model to characterize the network energy consumption. If there is no traffic on a link, we will let it be sleeping. Otherwise, it is activated and we divide its energy consumption into base energy consumption and traffic energy consumption. The former describes the constant energy consumption that exists when the link runs, while the later, which is a quadratic function with respect to the traffic, indicates the relations between link energy consumption and the traffic on the link. Then considering the relation among network energy consumption, number of active links, and QoS constraints, we build the multi-constrained energy efficient model to overcome the high energy consumption in large-scale cloud computing networks. Finally, we exploit the NSF and GEANT network topology to validate our model. Simulation results show that our approach can significantly improve energy efficiency of cloud computing networks.

Keywords

Energy efficiency Cloud computing Modeling Constraint optimization Multimedia medical devices 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 61571104, 61071124), the General Project of Scientific Research of the Education Department of Liaoning Province (No. L20150174), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (No. NCET-11-0075), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. N120804004, N130504003), and the State Scholarship Fund (201208210013). The authors wish to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Antonakopoulos S, Fortune S, Zhang L (2010) Power-aware routing with rate-adaptive network elements. In: Proc GLOBECOM 2010, pp 1428–1432Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews M, Anta A, Zhang L, et al. (2010) Routing for energy minization in the speed scaling model. In: Proc INFOCOM 2010, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolla R, Bruschi R, Davoli F, et al. (2009) Energy-aware performance optimization for next-generation green network equipment. In: Proc PRESTO 2009, pp 49–54Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beloglazov A, Buyya R (2015) OpenStack neat: a framework for dynamic and energy-efficient consolidation of virtual machines in OpenStack clouds. Concurrency Comput: Pract Experience 2(5):1310–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cianfrani A, Eramo V, Listanti M, et al. (2010) An energy saving routing algorithm for a green OSPF protocol. In: Proc INFOCOM 2010, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chiaraviglio L, Mellia M, Neri F (2009) Reducing power consumption in backbone networks. In: Proc ICC 2009, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cai Y, Yu FR, Bu S (2014) Cloud Computing Meets Mobile Wireless Communications in Next Generation Cellular Networks, IEEE Network, acceptedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiaraviglio L, Mellia M, Neri F (2011) Minimizing ISP network energy cost: Formulation and solutions. IEEE Trans Netw 20(2):463–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dinh HT, Lee C, Niyato D, et al. (2013) A survey of mobile cloud computing: Architecture, applications, and approaches. Wirel Commun Mob Comput 13(1):1587–1611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dabbagh M, Hamdaoui B, Guizani M, et al. (2015) Toward energy-efficient cloud computing: PervasiveNationiction, consolidation, and overcommitment. IEEE Netw 29(2):56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ge X, Huang X, Wang Y, et al. (2014) Energy-efficiency optimization for MIMO-OFDM Mobile multimedia communication systems with QoS constraints. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 63(5):2127–2138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guo C, Liu X, Jin M, et al. (2015) The research on optimization of auto supply chain network robust model under macroeconomic fluctuations. Chaos, Solitons & FractalsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Guo C, Guo Q, Jin M, et al. (2015) Dynamic systems based on preference graph and distance. Discrete Contin. Dyn Syst Ser S 8(6):1139–1154MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gattulli M, Tornatore M, Fiandra R, et al. (2012) Low-emissions routing for cloud computing in IP-over-WDM networks with data centers. In: Proc ICC’12, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gattulli M, Tornatore M, Fiandra R, et al. (2014) Low-emissions routing for cloud computing in IP-over-WDM networks with data centers. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 32(1):28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heydarikiya F, Haghighat AT, Heydarikiya M (2014) e-STAB: Energy-efficient scheduling for cloud computing applications with traffic load balancing. In: Proc ECDC’14, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang D, Xu Z, Wang W, et al. (2015) A collaborative multi-hop routing algorithm for maximum achievable rate. J Netw Comput Appl 57(2015):182–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jiang D, Xu Z, Zhang P, et al. (2014) A transform domain-based anomaly detection approach to network-wide traffic. J Netw Comput Appl 40(2):292–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang D, Wang Y, Yao C, et al. (2015) An effective dynamic spectrum access algorithm for multi-hop cognitive wireless networks. Comput Netw 84(19):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jiang D, Xu Z, Chen Z, et al. (2011) Joint time-frequency sparse estimation of large-scale network traffic. Comput Netw 55(10):3533–3547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jiang D, Xu Z, Li W, et al. (2015) Network coding-based energy-efficient multicast routing algorithm for multi-hop wireless networks. J Syst Softw 104:152–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang D, Xu Z, Liu J, et al. An optimization-based robust routing algorithm to energy-efficient networks for cloud computing. Telecommunication Systems, March 14, 2015, online availableGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim Y, Lee C, Rhee J (2012) IP-over-WDM cross-layer design for green optical networking with energy proportionality consideration. J Lightwave Technol 30(13)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lian S, Gritzalis S (2015) Innovations in emerging multimedia communication systems. Telecommun Syst 59(3):289–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lv Z, Yin T, Han Y, et al. (2011) WebVR11web virtual reality engine based on P2P network. J Netw 6(7):990–998Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin Y, Yang J, Lv Z, et al. (2015) A self-assessment stereo capture model applicable to the internet of things. Sensors 15(8):20925–20944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lv Z, Halawani A, Fen S, et al. (2015) Touch-less interactive augmented reality game on vision based wearable device. Pers Ubiquit Comput 19(3):551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lv Z, Tek A, Silva D, et al. (2013) Game on science-how video game technology may help biologists tackle visualization challenges. PloS one 8(3):57990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Larumbe F, Sanso B (2012) Optimal location of data centers and software components in cloud computing network design. In: Proc CCGC’12, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lange C, Kosiankowski D, Hugo DV, et al. (2014) Analysis of energy consumption in carrier networks. In: Proc ONDM’14, pp 96–101Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marnerides AK, Watson MR, Shirazi N, et al. (2013) Malware analysis in cloud computing: Network and system characteristics. In: Proc Globecom Workshops’13, pp 482–487Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moreno-Vozmediano R, Montero RS, Llorente IM (2012) Key challenges in cloud computing: Enabling the future Internet of services. IEEE Internet Comput 17 (4):18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mastelic T, Brandic I (2015) Recent trends in energy-efficient cloud computing. IEEE Cloud Comput 2(1):40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pickavet M, Vereecken W, Demeyer S, et al. (2008) Worldwide energy needs for ICT: The rise of power-aware networking. In: Proc ANTS 2008, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Qi H, Gani A (2012) Research on mobile cloud computing: Review, trend and perspectives. In: Proc DICTAP, pp 195–202Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheng G, Dang S, Hossain N, et al. (2015) Modeling of mobile communication systems by electromagnetic theory in the direct and single reflected propagation scenario. Applications and Techniques in Information Security. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 280–290Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shu W, Wang W, Wang Y (2014) A novel energy-efficient resource allocation algorithm based on immune clonal optimization for green cloud computing, EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, onlineGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sanaei Z, Abolfazli S, Gani A, et al. (2014) Heterogeneity in mobile cloud computing: Taxonomy and open challenges. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 16(1):369–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Uddin J, Jeong I, Kang M, et al. (2014) Accelerating IP routing algorithm using graphics processing unit for high speed multimedia communication. Multimedia Tools and Applications, online, pp. 1-15Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wang K, Liu NI, Sadooghi I, et al. (2015) Overcoming hadoop scaling limitations through distributed task execution. In: Proc IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, pp 236–245Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wang Y, Su Y, Agrawal G (2015) A novel approach for approximate aggregations over arrays. In: proc. the 27th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang C, Wang Q, Ren K, et al. (2012) Toward secure and dependable storage services in cloud computing. IEEE Trans Serv Comput 5(2):220–232MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yan Y, Yang Y, Meng D, et al. (2015) Event oriented dictionary learning for complex event detection. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2015 24(6):1867–1878MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yang J, He S, Lin Y, et al. (2015) Multimedia cloud transmission and storage system based on internet of things. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–16Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang Y, Zhou J, Lv Z, et al. (2015) A real-time monitoring system of industry carbon monoxide based on wireless sensor networks. Sensors 15(11):29535–29546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yang J, Chen B, Zhou J, et al. (2015) A low-power and portable biomedical device for respiratory monitoring with a stable power source. Sensors 15(8):19618–19632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhou H, Liu B, Luan T, et al. (2014) Chaincluster: Engineering a cooperative content distribution framework for highway vehicular communications. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 15(6):2644–2657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang X, Han Y, Hao D, et al. (2015) ARPPS: Augmented reality pipeline prospect system. Neural Information Processing. Springer International Publishing, 647–656Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina
  2. 2.TSSGWaterford Institute of TechnologyWaterfordIreland
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaTwin CitiesUSA

Personalised recommendations