Optimizing the deadzone width to improve the polyphase-based multiple description coding
- 134 Downloads
The polyphase-based mechanism is the basis of many multiple descriptions coding schemes. Its main drawback is the inefficient exploitation of the inserted redundancy, especially when the redundancy is large. In this paper we propose a novel approach that uses mid-tread quantizers with tunable deadzone, in order to efficiently exploit the inserted redundancy. In particular, the deadzone width is selected based on the statistical distribution of the data, and the approximated level of redundancy to be inserted. The proposed approach is tailored for those codecs that use mid-tread quantizers with tunable step-size and deadzone width. This is particularly interesting given that the majority of codecs use this topology of quantization, and they rarely allow changing it. Moreover, the proposed scheme can be extended to the case of more than two descriptions. Finally, it is worth reporting that the results of the proposed approach outperform that of state-of-the-art schemes. In fact with the same side performance, the central quality can achieve up to 1 dB gain.
KeywordsImage coding Multiple description coding Scalar quantization
This work was supported by 973 Program, under Grant 2011CB302204, the National Science Foundation of China for Distinguished Young Scholars, under Grant 61025013, Sino-Singapore JRP, under Grant 2010DFA11010, National Natural Science Foundation of China, under Grants 60776794, 60972085.
- 4.Jiang W, Ortega A (1999) Multiple description coding via polyphase transform and selective quantization. In: Proc. SPIE intl. conf. on visual comm. and image proc., pp 998–1008Google Scholar
- 6.Neuhoff DL (1993) The other asymptotic theory of lossy source coding. In: In coding and quantization of DIMACS series in discrete mathematics and theoretical computer science, vol 14, pp 55–65Google Scholar
- 7.Raykar VC (2002) Probability density function estimation by different methods. ENEE 739Q SPRING 2002 course assignment 1 report, pp 1–8Google Scholar