Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 455–474 | Cite as

The effects of social network properties on the acceleration of fashion information on the web

  • Kieun Song
  • Sunjin Hwang
  • Yunsik Kim
  • Youngsik Kwak
Article

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the acceptance of word-of-mouth information that is currently being disseminated between consumers in the internet fashion community. In particular, we suggest the network features formed in the internet fashion information community as variables influencing the acceptance of word-of-mouth information and analyze the actual effects in an empirical way. To do so, first of all, we conducted a social network analysis and investigated the features of the network spread patterns involving fashion information shared between community members. Thereafter, we set up the network variables as factor influencing the acceptance of fashion information in the internet and, including these variables, conducted a significance test on the impact of the informational properties and individual characteristic variables. As a result, in terms of the characteristics of the fashion community network, fashion information is produced intensively by a few information activists focusing on fashion information within the community and influences many information acceptors. In addition, as a result of hypothesis testing on the factors influencing the acceptance of the fashion information, we found that the informational properties, individual characteristic variables, as well as network characteristic variables, have a significant influence on the verbal acceptance, which confirms the importance of the network characteristic variables in the study of word of mouth marketing on the internet.

Keywords

e-WOM Fashion information On-line fashion community Social network 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn KH, Hwang SJ, Jung CJ (2010) Fashion Marketing. Suhaksa, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bampo M, Ewing MT, Mather DR, Stewart D, Wallace M (2008) The effects of the social structure of digital networks on viral marketing performance. Inf Syst Res 19(3):273–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barabasi A (2002) Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business science and everyday life. Plum, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bart B, Nick D, Davide M, Quang N, Sander VN, Bart VP, Albert AS, Alkim AAS (2011) Explorative visualization and analysis of a social network for arts: the case of deviantART. Joc 2(1):87–94Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonacichi P (1987) Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 92:1170–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brickart B, Schinlder RM (2001) Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. J Interact Mark 15(5):31–52Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brickart B, Shindler RM (2001) Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. J Interact Mark 15(5):31–52Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burkhardt ME, Brass DJ (1990) Changing patterns or patterns of change: the effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Adm Sci Q 35:104–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burt RS (1992) Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, M.AGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cacioppo JT, Petty RE (1982) The need for cognition. J Personal Soc Psychol 42:116–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Celso MA, Rossi CA (2008) Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. J Acad Mark Sci 36:578–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2003) The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. pp. 1–30, NBER Working paper 10148Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cohen J, Cohen P (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral science. Laerence Erlbaum Associates, Hilsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cohen AR, Stotland E, Wolfe DM (2003) Am experimental investigation of need for cognition. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 51:291–294Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Constant D, Sproull L, Kiesler S (1996) The kindness of strangers: the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organization scienceGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13(3):319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deshpande R, Zaltman G (1982) Factor affecting the use of marketing research information. J Mark Res 19:14–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Elliott KM (2002) Understanding consumer-to-consumer influence on the web. Doctoral dissertation, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eric R, Ahmad Mohamed A (2010) Access control to objects and their description in the future network of information, JIPS, 359–374Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Geissler GL, Edison SW (2005) Market Mavens’ attitude toward. General technology: implications for marketing communications. Journal of Marketing Communication 11(2):73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1360–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Han Kim (2008) Network analysis of and online community, Physics A. 387Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hanneman RA, Riddle M (2005) Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, CAGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haugtvedt CP, Pretty RE, Cacioppo JC (1992) Need for cognition and advertising: understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. J Consum Psychol 1(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herr PM, Karde FR, Kim J (1991) Effects of word of mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. J Consum Res 17(4):454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibarra H, Andrew SB (1993) Network centrality, power, and innovation, involvement: determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad Manag J 36(3):471–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaiser SB (1997) The social psychology of clothing. Fairchild, NYGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Keller PM, Block LG (1997) Vividness effects: a resource-matching perspective. J Consum Res 24(3):295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim YH (2007) Social network analysis. Parkyoungsa, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kim MT, Lee JH (2007) Effects of consumer innovativeness and reference group compliance on use-diffusion and brand re-adoption of a convergence product. Korea Industrial Economics Association 20(3):1253–1278Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kim HS, Rhee EY, Yee JY (2008) Comparing fashion process networks and friendship networks in small groups of Adolescents. J Fash Mark Manag 12(4):545–564Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Korea Communications Commission and Kisa (2010) Survey on the Internet UsageGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Laura G, Caroline H, Barry W (1997) Studying online social networks. J Comput-Mediat Commun 3(1):75–105Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lee TM (2004) The effects of components of interactivity on customer relationship building and purchase intentions in mobile environments. Korea marketing review 19(1):61–96Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lee EY (2004) Two factor model of on line word of mouth adoption and diffusion. Seoul national universityGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee SL (2008) A study about the impacts of on-line community behaviors and individual characteristics on WOM effects. Korean Academic society of business administration 37(4):957–988Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lee HJ (2011) Analysis of business attributes in information technology environments, JIPS, 385–396Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee HS, Ahn KH, Ha YW (2008) Consumer behavior. Bubmonsa, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lee HY, Chung EH, Lee JH (2007) Web2.0: Social diffusion of digital content. Institute of Information and Communications PolicyGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee DH, Gu JE (2001) A study on the effect of on-line brand community. Korean Academic Society of Business Administration 16(2):115–139Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lee HS, Lim JH (2009) Marketing research. Bubmoonsa, SeoulGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moenaert RK, Souder WE (1990) An analysis of the use of extrafunction information by R&D and marketing personnel: review and model. Journal of Production Innovation Management 7:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    No GY (2008) New media of communication and interactivity. Institute of information and communications policyGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Okleshen C, Grossbart G (1998) Usenet group, virtual community and consumer behaviors. Adv Consum Res 25(2):276–282Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Omaima B (2011) Exploring consumers acceptance of mobile payments-an empirical study. IJITCC 1(2):173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Park JS (1996) Study on uses of the computer-mediated communication, Ewha universityGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Park CW (2007) Art world networks and art market performance—the case of fine art photography. Korean Journal of Sociology 41(4):280–317Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Roehrich G (2004) Consumer innovativeness concepts and measurements. J Bus Res 57:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovation 4th. Free Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovation, 4th edn. Free Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schiffman LG, Kanuk LL (1997) Consumer behavior 7th. Prentice Hall, Upper saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schrank HL, Gilmore DL (1973) Correlates of fashion leadership. Sociol Q 14:534–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Scott J (2000) Social network analysis: A handbook. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sen S, Lerman D (2007) Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. J Interact Mark 21(4):76–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Song YT (2007) The effects of preannouncement on word of mouth diffusion in online community. Seoul national universityGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tong L, Fahiang Y, Yang L, Xueyuan K, Yue Y (2011) Trusted computing dynamic attestation using a static analysis based behavior model. Joc 2(1):61–68Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wang SJ (2010) Hierarchical key derivation scheme for group-oriented communication systems. IJITCC 1(1):66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wasserman S, Raust K (1994) Social network analysis. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Watts DJ (2003) Networks, dynamics, and small-world phenomenon. Am J Sociol 105(2):493–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wellman B (1992) Which types of ties and networks give what kinds of social support? Advances in Group Process 9:207–235Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wellman B, Boase J, Chen W (2002) The networked nature of community: on and off the internet. IT and Society 1(1):151–165Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wilton PC, Myers JG (1986) Task, expectancy, and information assessment effects in information utilization process. J Consum Res 12(March):469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kieun Song
    • 1
  • Sunjin Hwang
    • 1
  • Yunsik Kim
    • 1
  • Youngsik Kwak
    • 2
  1. 1.Sungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Gyengnam National University of Science and TechnologySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations