Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 69–96 | Cite as

Determining trust in media-rich websites using semantic similarity

  • Pradeep K. AtreyEmail author
  • Hicham Ibrahim
  • M. Anwar Hossain
  • Sheela Ramanna
  • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
Article

Abstract

Significant growth of multimedia content on the World Wide Web (or simply ‘Web’) has made it an essential part of peoples lives. The web provides enormous amount of information, however, it is very important for the users to be able to gauge the trustworthiness of web information. Users normally access content from the first few links provided to them by search engines such as Google or Yahoo!. This is assuming that these search engines provide factual information, which may be popular due to criteria such as page rank but may not always be trustworthy from the factual aspects. This paper presents a mechanism to determine trust of websites based on the semantic similarity of their multimedia content with already established and trusted websites. The proposed method allows for dynamic computation of the trust level of websites of different domains and hence overcomes the dependency on traditional user feedback methods for determining trust. In fact, our method attempts to emulate the evolving process of trust that takes place in a user’s mind. The experimental results have been provided to demonstrate the utility and practicality of the proposed method.

Keywords

Multimedia Web Trust Semantic similarity 

References

  1. 1.
    LSCOM: large scale ontology for multimedia. URL: http://lastlaugh.inf.cs.cmu.edu/lscom/. Last accessed 22 March 2011
  2. 2.
    Medical Library Association. URL: http://www.mlanet.org/resources/medspeak/topten.html. Last accessed 22 March 2011
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Oxford english dictionary: the compact edition. Oxford University Press, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Ani B, Redmiles D (2008) Forces that influence trust in technology in the Middle East: culture, politics and history. In: ACM workshop on HCI for community and international developmentGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Albertoni R, Martino MD (2008) Asymmetric and context-dependent semantic similarity among ontology instances. Springer journal on data semantics X. LNCS 4900:1–30Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andreatta C (2008) Ontology based viso-semantic similarity for image retrieval. In: International workshop on content-based multimedia indexing, pp 70–76. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ang L, Dubelaar C, Lee BC (2001) To trust or not to trust? A model of internet trust from the customer’s point of view. In: The 14th Bled electronic commerce conference, pp 40–52. Bled, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barrington L, Chan A, Turnbull D, Lanckriet G (2007) Audio information retrieval using semantic similarity. In: The IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing, vol 2, pp II-725–II-728Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Batko M, Falchi F, Lucchese C, Novak D, Perego R, Rabitti F, Sedmidubsky J, Zezula P (2010) Building a web-scale image similarity search system. Multimed Tools Appl 47:599–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belanger F, Hiller JS, Smith WJ (2002) Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes. J Strateg Inf Syst 11:245–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bizer C, Oldakowski R (2004) Using context- and content-based trust policies on the semantic web. In: The 13th international world wide web conference on alternate track papers and posters, pp 228–229Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hyper textual web search engine. Comput Netw ISDN Syst 30(1–7):107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buttler D (2004) A short survey of document structure similarity algorithms. In: The 5th international conference on internet computingGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chen W (2010) Content-based image detection of semantic similarity. In: The 2nd international workshop on education technology and computer science, vol 2, pp 452–455. Wuhan, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen X, Kiyoki Y (2007) A visual and semantic image retrieval method based on similarity computing with query-context recognition. In: The 18th European–Japanese conference on information modelling and knowledge bases, pp 245–252. Yyteri, Pori, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Choi J, Cho M, Park SH, Kim P (2003) Concept-based image retrieval using the new semantic similarity measurement. In: International conference on computational science and its applications, vol 2667, pp 967–968. Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Daniel B (2002) Building social capital in virtual learning communities. URL: http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/daniel/index.htm. Last accessed 22 March 2011
  19. 19.
    Emurian HH, Wang DY (2005) An overview of online trust. Comput Hum Behav 21:105–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fox S (2000) Trust and privacy online: why Americans want to rewrite the rules. The Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington, DC. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2000/Trust-and-Privacy-Online/Summary/Findings.aspx. Last accessed 22 March 2011
  21. 21.
    Friedman B, Howe D, Kahn P (2000) Trust online. Commun ACM 43(12):34–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Golbeck J, Hendler J (2006) Inferring binary trust relationships in web-based social networks. ACM Trans Internet Technol 6(4):497–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Husted B (1998) The ethical limits of trust in business relations. Bus Ethics Q 8(2):233–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibrahim H, Atrey PK, El Saddik A (2007) Semantic similarity based trust computation in websites. In: The ACM international workshop on the many faces of multimedia semantics, pp 65–72. Augsburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jung MY, Park SH (2009) Semantic similarity based video retrieval. In: Studies in computational intelligence—new directions in intelligent interactive multimedia systems and services—2, vol 226, pp 381–390Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kaur I, Hornof AJ (2005) A comparison of LSA, WordNet and PMI-IR for predicting user click behavior. In: The SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 51–60Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kobayashi N, Inui K, Matsumoto Y (2007) Opinion mining from web documents: extraction and structurization. Inf Media Technol 2(1):326–337Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee MD, Pincombe B, Welsh M (2005) An empirical evaluation of models of text document similarity. In: The 27th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pp 1254–1259. Austin, USAGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Li Y, Raimund E (2008) Integrating trust management into usage control in p2p multimedia delivery. In: The 20th international conference on software engineering and knowledge engineering. San Francisco Bay, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu Y, Zhang D, Lu G, Ma W-Y (2007) A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recogn 40:262–282zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Neilsen J (1999) Trust or bust: communicating trustworthiness in web design. Jacob Nielsen’s Alertbox. URL: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/990307.html. Last accessed 22 March 2011
  32. 32.
    Nissenbaum H (2001) Securing trust online: wisdom or oxymoron? Boston Univ Law Rev 81:101–131Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oommen JB, Rueda L (2005) A formal analysis of why heuristic functions work. Artif Intell 164:1–22MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ramanna S (2010) Discovering image similarities: tolerance near set approach. In: Pal S, Peters J (eds) Rough fuzzy image analysis. Foundations and methodologies, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ryan MJ (2004) Trusting yourself: how to stop feeling overwhelmed and live more happily with less effort. Crown ArchetypeGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schneider GK (2008) Beyond algorithms: a librarian’s guide to finding web sites you can trust. URL: http://www.google.com/librariancenter/articles/0601_02.html. Last accessed 22 March 2011
  37. 37.
    Singh R, Bhattarai BD (2010) Dynamic content-page identification for media-rich websites. Multimed Tools Appl 50(3):491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Smeulders AWM, Worring M, Santini S, Gupta A, Jain R (2000) Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early-years. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22:1349–1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Torres V, Rodríguez E, Llorente S, Delgado J (2005) Trust and rights in multimedia content management systems. In: The IASTED conference on web technologies, applications, and services. Calgary, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wei W, Bin Y, Bang-sheng C (2010) Audio scene semantic similarity computing approach. In: The 2nd IEEE international conference on information management and engineering, pp 85–89Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pradeep K. Atrey
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hicham Ibrahim
    • 2
  • M. Anwar Hossain
    • 3
  • Sheela Ramanna
    • 1
  • Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Applied Computer ScienceUniversity of WinnipegWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.Multimedia Communications Research LaboratoryUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Software Engineering Department, CCISKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations