Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 59, Issue 3, pp 897–920 | Cite as

Open internet gateways to archives of media art

  • Andrzej GłowaczEmail author
  • Michał Grega
  • Mikołaj Leszczuk
  • Zdzisław Papir
  • Piotr Romaniak
  • Paweł Fornalski
  • Michał Lutwin
  • Jürgen Enge
  • Tabea Lurk
  • Viliam Šimko
Article

Abstract

The EU-projects OASIS Archive and GAMA aimed to develop systems for the common presentation of distributed Media Art works, independent of their location. The paper presents the technical solutions implemented during projects, and contextualise the work in the related media art scene. In order to ensure the preservation and availability (sustainability) of cultural heritage, the metadata systems of all participating institutions were interlinked and they can now be accessed by individual users (both researchers and general public) through an on-line interface. The developed multimedia archive servers enable the exchange of metadata within a distributed system and enable various play-out sources and media. The decentralised architecture, where data can remain at their physical location and are linked at the metadata level, is the key concept of the presented system.

Keywords

Storage/repositories Libraries/information repositories/publishing Feature measurement Intelligent web services and semantic web Arts 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the EC Culture 2000 programme for funding the OASIS Archive project as well as the EC eContentplus programme for funding the GAMA project.

References

  1. 1.
    ARC–Artistic Research Catalogue, http://www.hfg.edu/arc.
  2. 2.
    Belhumeur PN, Hespanha JP, Kriegman DJ (1997) Eigenfaces vs. fisherfaces: recognition using class specific linear projection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 19:711–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bolme DS, Beveridge JR, Teixeira M, Draper BA (2003) The CSU Face Identification Evaluation System: Its Purpose, Features and Structure. In: International Conference on Vision Systems (ICVS), LNCS, vol. 2626. Springer, Graz, pp 304–311Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Compure Kft. Compure Company, http://www.compure.com (2007)
  5. 5.
    DCMI. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set, Version 1.1 http://dublincore.org (2006)
  6. 6.
    Digital Preservation Guidance Note: 1. Selecting File Formats for Long-Term Preservation, Hgg. The National Archives, (2003) in: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk; see also: Gap analysis: a survey of PA tool provision, Hgg. PLANETS, in: http://www.planets-project.eu.
  7. 7.
    DILPS–Distributed Image Library Processing Systemhttp://www.hfg.edu.
  8. 8.
    Donald Knuth in “The Art Of Computer Programming, vol. 3: Sorting And Searching”, Addison-Wesley (1973), pp. 391–392Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DPE–Digital Preservation Europe,http://www.digitalpreservationeurope.eu.
  10. 10.
    DRAMBORA–Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment: Building Trust in Digital. Repositories Using DRAMBORA, Seamus Ross, Andrew McHugh, Raivo Ruusalepp, Hans Hofman & Perla Innocenti, Hgg: Digital Curation Centre (DCC), DigitalPreservationEurope (DPE), HATII at the University of Glasgow & National Archives of the Netherlands, DELOS Summer School, Pisa (2007), in: http://www.digitalpreservationeurope.eu; KEEP–Keeping Emulation Environments Portable, Guideline document and peripheral input/output libraries for developments, Antonio Ciuffreda, David Anderson, Janet Delve, Getaneh Agegn Alemu et. All, in: http://www.keep-project.eu
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    EAD–Encoded Archival Description Websitehttp://www.archivists.org
  13. 13.
    Jürgen Enge, Architecture of Archives, DILPS–Distributed Image Library Processing System.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kyong-Ho Lee, The State of the Art and Practice in Digital Preservation, in: Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Vol. 107, No 1, Jan–Feb 2002, pp. 93–106; Springate 2006, “New Media Preservation: Archives and Activists”, in: Docam Publications, Montreal (2006) http://www.docam.ca; PLANTES–Preservation and Long-Term Access through Networked Services http://www.planets-project.eu/.
  15. 15.
    MPEG, “Multimedia content description interface – Part 3: Visual,” International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11, Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio, Tech. Rep. ISO/IEC 15938–3:2002, (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    netzspannung.org, http://www.netzspannung.org.
  17. 17.
    Overview on the OASIS partner databaseshttp://www.oasis-archive.eu.
  18. 18.
    Payette, S., Lagoze, C.: FEDORA – Flexible and Extensible Digital Object and Repository Architecture (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Performative Wissenschaft–EyeVisionBot, http://performative-wissenschaft.de.
  20. 20.
    Stefan Paal, Boris Müller, et. al, Netzspannung.org. An internet media lab for knowledge discovery in mixed realities, in: Cast 01. Living in mixed realities, Hgg. Monika Fleischmann, Wolfgang Strauss, Bonn (2001), pp. 121–129Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tansley R, Smith MK, Harford-Walker J (2005) The DSpace Open Source Digital Asset Management System: Challenges and Opportunities. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3652:242–253, Springer, HeildelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    The Soundex Indexing System. National Archives and Records Administration. 2007-05-30. http://www.archives.gov/genealogy/census/soundex.html
  23. 23.
    Thornton Staples, Ross Wayland, Sandra Payette, The Fedora Project. An Open-source Digital Object Repository Management System, in: D-Lib Magazine, Volume 9 Number 4, (2003) http://www.dlib.org.
  24. 24.
    Turk M, Pentland A (1991) Eigenfaces for Recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, vol. 3. MIT, Cambridge, pp 71–86Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Der Maulen E (2007) The European library – history, technique and user expectations. Interlending 35(3):154–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Volker Heydegger, Analysing the Impact of File Formats on Data Integrity, in: Archiving 2008. Final Program and Proceedings, Hgg. Society for Imaging Science and Technology, Springfield, VA, Bern, pp. 50–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrzej Głowacz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michał Grega
    • 1
  • Mikołaj Leszczuk
    • 1
  • Zdzisław Papir
    • 1
  • Piotr Romaniak
    • 1
  • Paweł Fornalski
    • 1
  • Michał Lutwin
    • 1
  • Jürgen Enge
    • 2
  • Tabea Lurk
    • 2
  • Viliam Šimko
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of TelecommunicationsAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakówPoland
  2. 2.Karlsruhe University of Arts and DesignKarlsruheGermany
  3. 3.CIANT International Centre for Art and New TechnologiesPraha 4Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations