Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 59, Issue 1, pp 259–277 | Cite as

Design-in-play: improving the variability of indoor pervasive games

  • Bin Guo
  • Ryota Fujimura
  • Daqing Zhang
  • Michita Imai
Article

Abstract

Treasure is a pervasive game playing in the context of people’s daily living environments. Unlike previous pervasive games that are based on the predefined contents and proprietary devices, Treasure exploits the “design-in-play” concept to enhance the variability of a game in mixed-reality environments. Dynamic and personalized role design and allocation by players is enabled by exploring local smart objects as game props. The variability of the game is also enhanced by several other aspects, such as user-oriented context-aware action setting and playing environment redeployment. The effectiveness of the “design-in-play” concept is validated through a user study, where 15 subjects were recruited to play and author the trial game.

Keywords

Multimedia entertainment Pervasive gaming Context-aware computing Smart homes Smart objects Human-computer interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Beigl M, Gellersen HW, Schmidt A (2001) Mediacups: experience with design and use of computer-augmented everyday objects. Comput Netw 35(4):401–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benford S et al (2006) Can you see me now? ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 13(1):100–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bobick AF et al (1999) The KidsRoom: a perceptually-based interactive and immersive story environment. Presence 8(4):369–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chalmers M, Bell M, Brown B, Hall M, Sherwood S, Tennent P (2005) Gaming on the edge: using seams in ubicomp games. In: Proc. ACM advances in computer entertainment, pp 306–309Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheok AD, Thang LN (2006) Capture the flag: mixed-reality social gaming with smart phones. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(2):62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheok AD et al (2002) Touch-Space: mixed reality game space based on ubiquitous, tangible, and social computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 6(6):430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheok AD et al (2004) Human Pacman: a mobile, wide-area entertainment system based on physical, social, and ubiquitous computing. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8(2):71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fontijn W, Mendels P (2005) StoryToy the interactive storytelling toy. In: Proceedings of PerGames 2005, MunichGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo B, Satake S, Imai M (2008) Home-Explorer: ontology-based physical artifact search and hidden object detection system. Mobile Inf Syst 4(2):81–103Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo B, Satake S, Imai M (2008) Lowering the barriers to participation in the development of human-artifact interaction systems. Int J Semantic Comput 2(4):469–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harter A et al (2005) The anatomy of a context-aware application. In: Proc. of 5th ACM international conference on mobile computing and networking, pp 59–68Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    iPerG—integrated project of pervasive games, http://www.pervasive-gaming.org/index.php
  13. 13.
    Jegers K, Wiberg M (2006) Pervasive gaming in the everyday world. IEEE Pervasive Comput 5(1):78–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kelleher, C, Pausch, R, Kiesler, S (2007) Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In: Proc. CHI 2007, pp 1455–1464Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magerkurth C, Cheok AD, Mandryk RL, Nilsen T (2005) Pervasive games: bringing computer entertainment back to the real world. ACM Comput Entertainment 3(3):4–4Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Montemayor J, Druin A, Chipman G, Farber A, Guha ML (2004) Tools for children to create physical interactive storyrooms. ACM Comput Entertainment 2(1):12–12Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakadai K, Tsujino H (2005) Towards new human-humanoid communication: listening during speaking by using ultrasonic directional speaker. In: Proc. of robotics and automation, pp 1495–1500Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Orr RJ, Abowd GD (2000) The Smart Floor: a mechanism for natural user identification and tracking. In: Proc. of CHI 2000, New York, pp 275–276Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weiser M (1999) The computer for the 21st century. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Comput Commun Rev 3(3):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yap KK, Srinivasan V, Motani M (2005) Max: human-centric search of the physical world. In: Proc. of SenSys’05, pp 166–179Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yuichi F, Konstantinos K, Colin P, Pradeep B, Ioannis P, James L (2008) NEAT-o-Games: blending physical activity and fun in the daily routine. ACM Comput Entertainment 6(2):1–22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bin Guo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ryota Fujimura
    • 3
  • Daqing Zhang
    • 2
  • Michita Imai
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Computer ScienceNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anChina
  2. 2.Institut TELECOM SudParisEvryFrance
  3. 3.Department of Information & Computer ScienceKeio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations