Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 36, Issue 1–2, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Personalized and mobile digital TV applications

  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos


The introduction of mobile and broadband networks in complement to the existing satellite, cable, and terrestrial platforms, opens new opportunities for interactive TV (ITV) applications. In addition, the widespread adoption of multimedia computing has enabled the processing of TV content on personal devices such as mobile phones and PCs. The above developments raise novel issues and require the adoption of new multimedia standards and application frameworks. In particular, the explosion in the amount of available TV channels over digital television platforms (broadcast or internet protocol) makes searching and locating interesting content a cumbersome task. In this context, personalization research is concerned with the adaptation of content (e.g. movies, news, advertisements). Personalization is achieved with the employment of algorithms and data collection schemes that predict and recommend to television viewers content that match their interests. In addition, the distribution of TV content to mobile devices over broadband wireless raises the issue of video quality. Video quality depends on many aspects of the video encoding systems, such as bit rate and algorithms that model human perception of video on small screens. In this article, we examine contemporary research in personalized and mobile digital TV applications. Moreover, we present a critical survey of the most prominent research and provide directions for further research in personalized and mobile digital TV (DTV) applications.


Digital TV Interactive TV Personalization Mobile TV 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ardissono L, Kobsa A, Maybury M (eds) (2004) Personalized digital television: targeting programs to individual viewers. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balabanovic M, Shoham Y (1997) Fab: content-based collaborative recommendation. Commun ACM 40(3):66–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Elliott MT, Speck PS (1998) Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. J Advert Res 38(1):29–41Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Furht B (1996) Interactive television systems. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM symposium on Applied Computing. ACM, pp 7–11Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Furht B, Westwater R, Ice J (1998) Multimedia broadcasting over the internet: part I. IEEE Multimed 5(4):78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Furht B, Westwater R, Ice J (1999) Multimedia broadcasting over the internet: part II—video compression. IEEE Multimed 6(1):85–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kazasis FG, Moumoutzis N, Pappas N, Karanastasi A, Christodoulakis S, Designing Ubiquitous Personalized TV-Anytime Services, Workshop on Ubiquitous Mobile Information and Collaboration Systems—UMICS 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Masthoff J (2004) Group modeling: selecting a sequence of television items to suit a group of viewers. User Model User Adapt Interact 14:37–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pazzani M (1999) A framework for collaborative, content-based and demographic filtering. Artif Intell Rev 13(5/6):393–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Resnick P, Iacovou N, Suchak M, Bergstrom P, Riedl J (1994) GroupLens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of NetNews. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp 175–186Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, MUSIC labTechnical University of CreteHaniaGreece

Personalised recommendations