Advertisement

Multimedia Tools and Applications

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 393–410 | Cite as

Towards a Smarter Meeting Record—Capture and Access of Meetings Revisited

  • Werner Geyer
  • Heather RichterEmail author
  • Gregory D. Abowd
Article

Abstract

Multimedia records of meetings contain a rich amount of project information. However, finding detailed information in a meeting record can be difficult because there is no structural information other than time to aid navigation. In this paper we survey and discuss various ways of indexing meeting records by categorizing existing approaches along multiple dimensions. We then introduce the notion of creating indices based upon user interaction with domain-specific artifacts. As an example to illustrate the use of domain-specific artifacts to create meaningful pointers into the meeting record, we describe capture and access in a prototype system that supports general meeting artifacts.

Keywords

capture access multimedia meeting record indexing domain-specific artifact teamwork distributed meetings 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    3M Meeting Network Web Site, http://www.3m.com/meetingnetwork/, April 2002.
  2. 2.
    G. Abowd, C. Atkeson, J. Brotherton, P. Enqvist, and J. LeMon, “Investigating the capture, integration, and access problem of ubiquitous computing in an educational setting,” in Proc. CHI 98, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Arons, “Techniques, perception, and applications of time-compressed speech,” in Proc. of 1992 Conference, American Voice I/O Society, September 1992, pp. 169–177.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Bianchi, “AutoAuditorium: A fully automatic, multi-camera system to televise auditorium presentations,” in Proc. Joint DARPA/NIST Smart Spaces Technology Workshop, Gaithersburg, MD, July 1998.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Borghoff and J.H. Schlichter, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: Introduction to Distributed Applications, Springer, Berlin, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    B. Brumitt, B. Meyers, J. Krumm, A. Kern, and S. Shafer, “EasyLiving: Technologies for intelligent environments,” in Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, September 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. Chiu, A. Kapuskar, S. Reitmeir, and L. Wilcox, “NoteLook: Taking notes in meetings with digital video and ink,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia'99, New York, 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Chiu, J. Boreczky, A. Girgensohn, and D. Kimber, “LiteMinutes: An Internet-based system for multimedia meeting minutes,” in Proc. WWW10, May 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.J. Conklin, Designing Organizational memory: Preserving Intellectual Assets in a Knowledge Economy, http://www.gdss.com/wp/DOM.htm, GDSS 1996.
  10. 10.
    P. Cook, C. Ellis, M. Graf, G. Rein, and T. Smith, “Project nick: Meeting augmentation and analysis,” in ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 132–146, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. Cruz and R. Hill, “Capturing and playing multimedia events with streams,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia'94, San Francisco, October 1994, pp. 193–200.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L Degen, R. Mander, and G. Salomon, “Working with audio: Integrating personal tape recorders and desktop computers,” in Proc. Human Factors in Computer Systems, CHI'92, May 1992, pp. 413–418.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Discovery Server Web Site, http://www.lotus.com/products/discserver.nsf, July 2002.
  14. 14.
    L. Fuchs, W. Geyer, H. Richter, S. Poltrock, T. Frauenhofer, and S. Daijavad, “Enabling inter-company team collaboration,” in Proc. IEEE 10th Intl. Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructures for Collaborative Enterprises, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 20–22, 2001.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Geyer, H. Richter, L. Fuchs, T. Frauenhofer, S. Daijavad, and S. Poltrock, “A team collaboration space supporting capture and access of virtual meetings,” in Proc. Group2001, ACM 2001 International Conference on Supporting Group Work, Boulder, Colorado, USA, September 30–October 3, 2001.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Geyer, H. Richter, L. Fuchs, T. Frauenhofer, S. Daijavad, and S. Poltrock, “TeamSpace: A collaborative workspace system supporting virtual meetings,” IBM Research Report, RC 21961, February 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Gross, M. Bett, H. Yu, X. Zhu, Y. Pan, J. Yang, and A. Waibel, “Towards a multimodal meeting record,” in Proc. IEEE ICME 2000, New York, July 2000.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    A. Ginsberg and S. Ahuja, “Automating envisionment of virtual meeting room histories,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia 95, San Francisco, CA, November 5–9, 1995.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    L. He, E. Sanocki, A. Gupta, and J. Grudin, “Auto-summarization of audio-video presentations,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia'99, Orlando, FL, 1995, pp. 489–498.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. Hindus and C. Schmandt, “Ubiquitous audio: Capturing spontaneous collaboration,” in Proc. CSCW'92, November 1992, pp. 210–216.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    F. Khan, A Survey of Note-taking Practices, Technical Report, HP Labs, 1992.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    T.P. Moran, L. Palen, S. Harrison, P. Chiu, D. Kimber, S. Minneman, W. vanMelle, and P. Zelweger, “I'll get that off the audio: A case study of salvaging multimedia meeting records,” in Proc CHI'97, Atlanta, GA, 1997.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    T.P. Moran, W. van Melle, and P. Chiu, “Tailorable domain objects as meeting tools for an electronic whiteboard,” in Proc. CSCW 98, 1998, pp. 295–304.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Minneman, S. Harrison, B. Janssen, T. Moran, G. Kurtenbach, and I. Smith, “A confederation of tools for capturing and accessing collaborative activity,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia 95, San Francisco, CA, November 5–9, 1995, pp. 523–534.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    M. Muller, “J. PICTIVE—An exploration in participatory design,” in Proc. ACM CHI'91, 1991, pp. 225–231.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    NetMeeting Web Site, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/netmeeting/, June 2002.
  27. 27.
    N. Omoigui, L. He, A. Gupta, J. Grudin, and E. Sanocki, “Time-compression: System concerns, usage, and benefits,” in Proc. of ACM Conference on Computer Human Interaction, 1999.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Poltrock and G. Engelbeck, “Requirements for a virtual collocation environment”, in Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, S.C. Hayne and W. Prinz (eds.), 1997, Phoenix, AZ, ACM Press, pp. 61–70.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    QuickPlace Web Site, http://www.lotus.com/quickplace/, June 2002.
  30. 30.
    H. Richter, G. Abowd, W. Geyer, L. Fuchs, S. Daijavad, and S. Poltrock, “Integrating meeting capture within a collaborative team environment,” in Proc. Ubicomp 2001, ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Atlanta, GA, USA, September 30–October 2, 2001.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sametime Web Site, http://www.lotus.com/sametime/, June 2002.
  32. 32.
    K. Schmidt and L. Bannon, “Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work”, in Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 1, No. 1/2, pp. 7–40, 1992.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Slaney, D. Ponceleon, and J. Kaufman, “Multimedia edges: Finding hierarchy in all dimensions,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia 2001, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    S. Srinivasan, D. Ponceleon, A. Amir, and D. Petkovic, “‘What is in that video anyway?’: In search of better browsing,” in Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems Volume I. 1999, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    T. Syeda-Mahmood and S. Srinivasan, “Detecting topical events in digital video,” in Proc. ACM Multimedia, 2000, pp. 85–94.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Steinmetz and M. Kienzle, “e-Seminar lecture recording and distribution system,” in Proc. IS&T/SPIE's Electronic Imaging 2001, San Jose, CA, January 2001, pp. 25–36.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    H.D. Wactler, “Informedia—search and summarization in the video medium,” in Proc. of Imagina 2000 Conference, Monaco, 2000.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    WebEx Web Site, http://www.webex.com/, June 2002.
  39. 39.
    S. Whittaker, P. Hyland, and M. Wiley, “Filochat: Handwritten notes provide access to recorded conversations,” in Proc. CHI'94, Boston, April 1994, pp. 271–277.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    L. Wilcox, D. Kimber, and F. Chen, “Audio indexing using speaker identification,” in Proc. SPIE 2277, July 1994, pp. 149–157.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    L.D. Wilcox, B.N. Schilit, and N. Sawhney, “Dynomite: A dynamically organized ink and audio notebook,” in Proc. CHI'97, Atlanta, GA, March 1997.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    C.G. Wolf and J.R. Rhyne, “Facilitating review of meeting information using temporal histories,” Technical Report RC 19811, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 1992.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    C.G. Wolf and J.R. Rhyne, “Communication and information retrieval with a pen-based meeting support tool,” in Proc. CSCW'92, ACM Press, November 1992, pp. 322–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Werner Geyer
    • 1
  • Heather Richter
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Gregory D. Abowd
    • 2
  1. 1.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterCambridge
  2. 2.College of Computing & GVU CenterGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.Department of Software and Information SystemsUNC CharlotteCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations