Earth, Moon, and Planets

, Volume 102, Issue 1–4, pp 357–363 | Cite as

Global Detection of Infrasonic Signals from Three Large Bolides

  • Stephen J. ArrowsmithEmail author
  • Doug ReVelle
  • Wayne Edwards
  • Peter Brown


We present the infrasonic observations of three large bolides that were observed at numerous International Monitoring System (IMS) infrasound arrays on a global scale. First, a simple procedure for the global association of infrasound detections from large infrasound events is outlined. Infrasound signals are associated with large events based on arrival time, backazimuth and uniqueness at a given IMS array. Next, we apply the algorithm to three bolides and investigate some of the factors affecting the detectability of infrasound from large events. Our findings suggest that site-noise effects significantly degrade the capability of the IMS infrasound network, suggesting that more effort is required to reduce ambient site noise. These results have implications for the use of infrasound measurements (in particular those from IMS stations) as a tool for evaluating the global flux of near-Earth objects.


Bolide infrasound Meteor detection International Monitoring System 



We gratefully appreciate financial support from the GNEM Program of the US DOE-HQ in NA-22. Waveform data were obtained from the SMDC monitoring website.


  1. N. Brachet, J. Coyne, The Current Status of Infrasound Data Processing at the International Data Centre, Proceedings of the 28th Seismic Research Review, Orlando, Florida (2006)Google Scholar
  2. P.G. Brown, R.W. Whitaker, D.O. ReVelle, Multi-station infrasonic observations of two large bolides: signal interpretation and implications for monitoring of atmospheric explosions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29 (2002). doi: 10.1029/2001GL013778
  3. Y. Cansi, An automated seismic event processing for detection and location: The P.M.C.C. method. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 1021–1024 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Z. Ceplecha, J. Borovicka, W.G. Elford, D.O. ReVelle, R.L. Hawkes, V. Porubcan, M. Simel, Meteor phenomena and bodies. Space Sci. Rev. 84, 327–471 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. J.A. Docobo, R.E. Spalding, Z. Ceplecha, F. Diaz-Fierros, V. Tamazian, Y. Onda, Investigation of a bright flying object over Northwest Spain, 1994 January 18. Meteorit Planet. Sci. 33, 57–64 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Garces, P. Caron, C. Hetzer, A. Le Pichon, H. Bass, D. Drob, J. Bhattacharyya, Deep infrasound radiated by the Sumatra earthquake and Tsunami. Eos 86, 317–320 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. A.R. Klekociuk, P.G. Brown, D.W. Pack, D.O. ReVelle, W.N. Edwards, R.E. Spalding, E. Tagliaferri, B.B. Yoo, J. Zagari, Meteoritic dust from the atmospheric disintegration of a large meteoroid. Nature 436, 1132–1135 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. A. Le Pichon, P. Mialle, J. Guilbert, J. Vergoz, Multistation infrasonic observations of the Chilean earthquake of 2005 June 13. Geophys. J. Int. 167, 838–844 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. D. ReVelle, On meteor-generated infrasound, J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1217–1237 (1796)Google Scholar
  10. H. Wexler, W.A. Hass, Global atmospheric pressure effects of the October 30, 1961. Explosion. J. Geophys. Res. 67, 3875–3887 (1962)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen J. Arrowsmith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Doug ReVelle
    • 1
  • Wayne Edwards
    • 2
  • Peter Brown
    • 2
  1. 1.Atmospheric, Climate and Environmental Dynamics GroupLos Alamos National LaboratoryLos AlamosUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations