Earth, Moon, and Planets

, Volume 102, Issue 1–4, pp 53–58 | Cite as

Searching for the Parent of the Tunguska Cosmic Body

  • Tadeusz Jan Jopek
  • Christiane Froeschlé
  • Robert Gonczi
  • Piotr A. Dybczyński
Article

Abstract

We present the results of an extensive study of the Tunguska Cosmic Body (TCB) origin on dynamical grounds. To identify the TCB parent, or a plausible candidate, we applied the well-known concept of dynamical similarity whereby we have compared the geocentric and heliocentric dynamical parameters of a selected set of the Near Earth Objects (NEOs) and TCB particles. First, we made use the idea of Kresak by comparing geocentric coordinates of the TCB radiant with those of the NEOs. Second, we studied the long-term dynamical evolution of all NEOs and TCB particles searching for similarities between their heliocentric orbits. As a general result, we observed many more similar cases and a different pattern of the high orbital similarity among the TCB particles and the asteroid orbits than we did for comets.

Keywords

Meteoroids Minor planets Comets Methods Numerical 

Notes

Acknowledgements

TJJ was partly supported by the KBN Project 2 PO3D 007 22, and his visit in Nice was funded by the Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur. The authors wish to thank Professor Frans J.M. Rietmeijer for his suggestions for the improvement of this paper. Also we acknowledge referees David Asher and the anonymous one for their comments and for meticulously checking the details of the manuscript.

References

  1. G.V. Andreev, Was the Tunguska 1908 event caused by an Apollo asteriods? in Asteriods, Comets, Meteors III, ed. by C.I. Lagerkvist, H. Rickman, B.A. Lindblad. in Proceedings of a meeting held at the Uppsala University, 12–16 June 1989 (1990), pp. 489–492Google Scholar
  2. D.J. Asher, D.I. Steel, On the possible relation between the Tinguska bolide and comet Encke. Planet. Space Sci. 46, 205–211 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. V.A. Bronshten, Trajectory and orbit of the Tunguska meteorite revisited. Meteorit. & Planet. Sci. 34, A137–A143 (1999a)Google Scholar
  4. V.A. Bronshten, The nature of the Tunguska meteorite. Meteorit. & Planet. Sci. 34, 723–728 (1999b)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. V.A. Bronshten, Nature and destruction of the Tunguska cosmical body. Planet. Space Sci 48, 855–870 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Ch.F. Chyba, P.T. Thomas, K.J. Zahnle, The 1908 Tunguska explosion: atmospheric disruption of a stony asteroid. Nature 361, 40–44 (1993)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. P. Farinella, L. Foschini, Ch. Froeschlé, R. Gonczi, T.J. Jopek, G. Longo, P. Michel, Probable asteroidal origin of the Tunguska Cosmic Body. Astron. & Astrophys. 377, 1081–1097 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Foschini, A solution for the Tunguska event. Astron. & Astrophys. 342, L1–L4 (1999)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. L. Kresak, The Tunguska object: a fragment of comet Encke? Bull. Astron. Inst. Czechoslov. 29, 129–134 (1978)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. L. Kulik, On the History of the Bolide of 1908 June 30. J. Russian Acad. Sci. 1927A, 393–398 (1927a)Google Scholar
  11. L. Kulik, On the fall of the podkamennaya tunguska meteorite in 1908. J. Russ. Acad. Sci. 1927A, 399–402 (1927b)Google Scholar
  12. L. Kulik, Preliminary results of the meteorite expeditions made in the decade 1921–1931. Works Lomonossoff Inst. Russ. Acad. Sci. 2, 73–80 (1933)Google Scholar
  13. L. Kulik, The meteorite of June 30, 1908 in Central Siberia. Astron. Soc. Pac. Leaf. 109, 78–84 (1938)Google Scholar
  14. B.Y. Levin, V.A. Bronshten, The Tunguska event and the meteors with terminal flares. Meteoritics 21, 199–215 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. B.G. Marsden, G.V. Williams, Catalogue of Cometary Orbits 2003, 15th edn. (Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA, 2003)Google Scholar
  16. E.J. Öpik, Interplanetary Encounters (Elsevier, New York, 1976), pp. 155Google Scholar
  17. Z. Sekanina, The Tunguska event: no cometary signature in evidence. Astron. J. 88, 1382–1414 (1983)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Z. Sekanina, Evidence for asteroidal origin of the Tunguska object. Planet. Space Sci. 46, 191–204 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. R.B. Southworth, G.S. Hawkins, Statistics of meteor streams, Smithson. Contr. Astrophys. 7, 261–285 (1963)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Ch. Trayner, The Tunguska event. J. Br. Astron. Assoc. 107, 117–130 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. G.B. Valsecchi, T.J. Jopek, Cl. Froeschlé, Meteoroid stream identification: a new approach-I. Theory. Mont. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 304, 743–750 (1999)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. N.V. Vasilyev, The Tunguska problem today. Planet. Space Sci. 46, 129–150 (1998)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. I.T. Zotkin, Trajektorja i orbita Tungusskogo meteorita. Meteoritika 27, 109–118 (1966) (in Russian)Google Scholar
  24. I.T. Zotkin, Anomalnyje sumierki cvjazannyje s Tungusskim meteoritom. Meteoritika 29, 170–176 (1969) (in Russian)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tadeusz Jan Jopek
    • 1
  • Christiane Froeschlé
    • 2
  • Robert Gonczi
    • 2
  • Piotr A. Dybczyński
    • 1
  1. 1.Obserwatorium Astronomiczne UAMPoznanPoland
  2. 2.Observatoire de la Côte d’AzurNiceFrance

Personalised recommendations