Earth, Moon, and Planets

, Volume 94, Issue 1–2, pp 73–81 | Cite as

Future Benefits of Time-Varying Gravity Missions to Ocean Circulation Studies

Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

A summary is offered of the potential benefits of future measurements of temporal variations in gravity for the understanding of ocean dynamics. Two types of process, and corresponding amplitudes are discussed: ocean basin scale pressure changes, with a corresponding amplitude of order 1 cm of water, or 1 mm of geoid height, and changes in along-slope pressure gradient, at cross-slope length scales corresponding to topographic slopes, with a corresponding amplitude of order 1 mm of water, or a maximum of about 0.01 mm of geoid. The former is feasible with current technology and would provide unprecedented information about abyssal ocean dynamics associated with heat transport and climate. The latter would be a considerable challenge to any foreseeable technology, but would provide an exceptionally clear, quantitative window on the dynamics of abyssal ocean currents, and strong constraints on ocean models. Both options would be limited by the aliassing effect of rapid mass movements in the earth system, and it is recommended that any future mission take this error source explicitly into account at the design stage. For basin-scale oceanography this might involve a higher orbit than GRACE or GOCE, and the advantages of exact-repeat orbits and multiple missions should be considered.

Keywords

Abyssal ocean circulation changes ocean bottom pressure satellite gravity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clark, P. U., Pisias, N. G., Stocker, T. F., Weaver, A. J. 2002Nature415863869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cox, C. M., Chao, B. F. 2002Science297831883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickey, J. O., Marcus, S. L., Viron, O.O, Fukumori, I. 2002Science29819751977CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukumori, I, Raghunath, R., Fu, L.-L. 1998J. Geophys. Res.10354935512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gill, A. E., Niiler, P. P. 1973Deep-Sea Res.20141177Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, C. W., Cuevas, B. A. 2001J. Phys. Oceanogr.3128712885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hughes, C. W., Stepanov, V. 2003Space Science Reviews108217224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knudsen, P. 2003Space Science Reviews108261270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ray, R. D., Rowlands, D. D., Egbert, G. D. 2003Space Science Reviews108271282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wahr, J., Molenaar, M., Bryan, F. 1998J. Geophys. Res.1033020530229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Proudman Oceanographic LaboratoryLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Physical Oceanography LaboratoryPlouzaneFrance

Personalised recommendations