Duopoly Provision of Services Based on Wireless Sensor-supplied Data: a Differential Game Model

  • Angel Sanchis-CanoEmail author
  • Luis Guijarro
  • Vicent Pla
  • Jose R. Vidal


The provision of services based on wireless sensor data is analyzed dynamically. In the proposed scenario, two competing service providers deploy their own wireless sensor networks in order to collect the data and provide services to final users. The service providers compete in prices dynamically in order to maximize their profits, while the behavior of the users is modeled using a discrete choice model. The model is analyzed using game theory. The changes in the population of users are analyzed through an evolutionary game and the Logit dynamic, while the dynamic competition in prices is studied using a differential game. We conclude that the dynamic pricing competition is economically feasible for the service providers and, in addition, the dynamic solution converges to the static solution of the scenario.


Wireless sensor networks Network economics Dynamic pricing Differential game Internet of things Game theory 


  1. 1.
    Tan L (2010) Future internet: the internet of things. 3rd Int Conf Adv Comput Theory Eng 5:V5. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ericsson (2015) Ericsson Mobility Report: 70 percent of world’s population using smartphones by 2020Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ericsson (2017) Ericsson Mobility Report. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biral A, Centenaro M, Zanella A, Vangelista L, Zorzi M (2015) The challenges of M2M massive access in wireless cellular networks. Digit Commun Networks 1(1):1. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Palattella MR, Dohler M, Grieco A, Rizzo G, Torsner J, Engel T, Ladid L (2016) Internet of things in the 5G era: enablers, architecture, and business models. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 34(3):510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mao Z, Nan G, Li M (2012) A dynamic pricing scheme for congestion game in wireless machine-to-machine networks. Int J Distrib Sens Networks 2012:e840391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsiropoulou EE, Vamvakas P, Papavassiliou S (2017) Joint customized price and power control for energy-efficient multi-service wireless networks via S-modular theory. IEEE Trans Green Commun Netw 1(1):17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koseoglu M (2015) In: IEEE 2nd World forum on internet of things (WF-IoT), pp 187–192.
  9. 9.
    Vidal JR, Pla V, Guijarro L, Martinez-Bauset J (2013) Dynamic spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks using truthful mechanisms and virtual currency. Ad Hoc Netw 11(6):1858. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips (2003) Teaching pricing and revenue optimization. INFORMS Trans Educ 4(1):1. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mandjes M (2003) Pricing strategies under heterogeneous service requirements. Comput Networks 42(2):231. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jara-díaz S (2007) Transport economic theory. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, BingleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Romero J, Guijarro L, Pla V, Vidal JR (2017) Price competition between a macrocell and a small-cell service provider with limited resources and optimal bandwidth user subscription: a game-theoretical model. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niyato D, Hossain E (2008) Competitive pricing for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: dynamic game, inefficiency of nash equilibrium, and collusion. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 26(1):192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niyato D, Hossain E (2008) Competitive pricing in heterogeneous wireless access networks: issues and approaches. IEEE Netw 22(6):4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Al Daoud A, Alanyali M, Starobinski D (2010) Pricing strategies for spectrum lease in secondary markets. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 18(2):462. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu K, Niyato D, Wang P, Han Z (2012) Dynamic spectrum leasing and service selection in spectrum secondary market of cognitive radio networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 11(3):1136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu K, Hossain E, Niyato D (2014) Pricing, spectrum sharing, and service selection in two-tier small cell networks: a hierarchical dynamic game approach. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 13(8):1843. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chintagunta PK, Rao VR (1996) Pricing strategies in a dynamic duopoly: a differential game approach. Manage Sci 42:1501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanchis-Cano A, Romero J, Sacoto-Cabrera E, Guijarro L (2017) Economic feasibility of wireless sensor network-based service provision in a duopoly setting with a monopolist operator. Sensors 17(12):2727. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Altman E, Boulogne T, El-Azouzi R, Jiménez T, Wynter L (2006) A survey on networking games in telecommunications. Comput Oper Res 33(2):286. MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Weber T (2011) Optimal control theory with applications in economics. The MIT Press, Cambridge. CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandholm WH (2010) Population games and evolutionary dynamics. The MIT Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wolfram Numerical solution of boundary value problemsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ITACAUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations