Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 19, Issue 6, pp 772–789 | Cite as

BSense: A Flexible and Open-Source Broadband Mapping Framework

  • Giacomo Bernardi
  • Damon Fenacci
  • Mahesh K. Marina
Article

Abstract

We present, BSense, a flexible broadband mapping system for broadband coverage and quality assessment of broadband connections in a given geographic region. For coverage related analysis, it relies on data that is either obtained from ISPs or generated based on technology models and information about infrastructure sites. Broadband quality assessment in BSense is via host-based measurements using our multi-platform and technology-adaptive software client which periodically runs as a background process on users’ computers. The host-based software measurement approach employed in BSense is not only cost-effective but is also flexible and reduces measurement bias. BSense also incorporates a flexible broadband quality index for summarizing the collective effect of various underlying attributes such as download/upload speeds and latency. BSense system has been implemented based on open-source software components. We conduct extensive evaluations of the measurement component of BSense aimed at quantifying system effects and to compare against other measurement techniques and approaches, the latter showing that BSense is fairly close to sophisticated and expensive alternatives. The usefulness of the BSense system is demonstrated using two real world case studies, one on identifying notspots in Scotland and the other on broadband quality assessment in a rural part of Scotland through pilot deployment.

Keywords

Broadband mapping Broadband coverage assessment Mobile coverage analysis Crowdsourced performance measurement of fixed wired Wireless and dongle-based mobile broadband connections Broadband quality index Design Implementation and testbed/experimental evaluations Service and application management platforms Autonomic network monitoring and management 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Dimitrios Pezaros for his participation and inputs to this project. We also thank Mike Fourman whose suggestion gave birth to this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Ofcom UK mobile services map (2013) http://maps.ofcom.org.uk/mobile-services/
  2. 2.
    Ofcom UK fixed broadband map (2013) http://maps.ofcom.org.uk/broadband/
  3. 3.
    US national broadband map. http://broadbandmap.gov/
  4. 4.
    Broadband map for Germany. http://www.breitbandatlas.de
  5. 5.
    Ookla speedtest. http://www.speedtest.net/
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Grubesic TH (2008) Spatial data constraints: implications for measuring broadband. Telecommun Policy 32(7)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ofcom (2008) Assessment of the theoretical limits of copper in the last mile. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/market-data-research/other/technology-research/research/emerging-tech/copper/
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Sundaresan S, et al (2012) Measuring home broadband performance. Commun ACM 55(11)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Network diagnostic tool (NDT). http://www.measurementlab.net/tools/ndt
  12. 12.
    Dischinger M, Haeberlen A, Gummadi K, Saroiu S (2007) Characterizing residential broadband networks. In: Proc. Internet measurement conference (IMC)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Russell S, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence: a modern approach, chapter 16. PearsonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanuparthy P, Dovrolis C (2011) ShaperProbe: end-to-end detection of ISP traffic shaping using active methods. In: Proc. Internet measurement conference (IMC)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Bernardi G, Marina MK (2010) Short paper: BSense – a system for enabling automated broadband census. In: Proc.4th ACM workshop on networked systems for developing regions (NSDR’10)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Donato W, Botta A, Pescape A (2014) HoBBIT: a platform for monitoring broadband performance from the user network. In: Proc. 6th international workshop on traffic monitoring and analysis (TMA’14)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagnulo M, et al (2014) Building a standard measurement platform. IEEE Commun 52(5)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    DiCioccio L, Teixeira R, Rosenberg C (2013) Measuring home networks with HomeNet profiler. In: Proc. Passive and active measurement (PAM) conferenceGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grover S, et al (2013) Peeking behind the NAT: an empirical study of home networks. In: Proc. Internet measurement conference (IMC)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Canadi I, Barford P, Sommers J (2012) Revisiting broadband performance. In: Proc. Internet measurement conference (IMC)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sundaresan S, Feamster N, Teixeira R, Magharei N (2013) Measuring and mitigating web performance bottlenecks in broadband access networks. In: Proc. Internet measurement conference (IMC)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chetty M, et al (2013) Measuring broadband performance in South Africa. In: Proc. 4th annual ACM symposium on computing for development (DEV)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koradia Z, et al (2013) First impressions on the state of cellular data connectivity in India. In: Proc. 4th annual ACM symposium on computing for development (DEV)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vicente M, Gil de Bernab F (2010) Assessing the broadband gap: From the penetration divide to the quality divide. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 77(5)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Joumblatt D, Teixeira R, Chandrashekar J, Taft N (2010) Hostview: annotating end-host performance measurements with user feedback. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform Eval Rev 38 (3)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sundaresan S, et al (2011) Helping users shop for ISPs with internet nutrition labels. Proc. ACM HomeNetsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Joumblatt D, Goga O, Teixeira R, Chandrashekar J, Taft N (2012) Characterizing end-host application performance across multiple networking environments. In: Proc. IEEE INFOCOMGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Botta A, Dainotti A, Pescape A (2012) A tool for the generation of realistic network workload for emerging networking scenarios. Comput Netw 56(15)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carbone M, Rizzo L (2010) Dummynet revisited. Comput Commun Rev 40(2)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bernardi G, Buneman P, Marina M K (2008) Tegola tiered mesh network testbed in rural Scotland. In: Proc. ACM mobicom workshop on wireless networks and systems for developing regions (WiNS-DR’08)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bauer S, Clark D, Lehr W (2009) Understanding broadband speed measurements. MITAS Project White PaperGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giacomo Bernardi
    • 1
  • Damon Fenacci
    • 1
  • Mahesh K. Marina
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations