Advertisement

Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 311–314 | Cite as

Advances In Wireless Test beds and Research Infrastructures

  • Miguel Ponce de Leon
  • Shiwen Mao
  • Frank Steuer
  • Jens Schumacher
  • Thomas Magedanz
  • Raheem A. Beyah
  • Scott Midkiff
Article

Communication infrastructures play a vital role in modern society. Advances in the range of service offerings, performance, quality of service, security, and ubiquity continue to flourish, despite global economic fluctuations. Clearly the world has gone wireless with a massive set of new smart phones, service platforms, middleware, and application stores.

With this growth, fresh research challenges in the wireless environment have arisen, from the need for efficient energy conservation, to the integration of wireless systems into heterogeneous large scale networks, to the fast re-authentication of clients as they move between communication systems.

Wireless test beds and experimental research infrastructures are playing a vital role in validating new innovations in this environment. Access to experimental wireless infrastructure for verifying real-life applications by specific user communities benefits all the stakeholders involved: the end users, because of the firsthand evaluation of the provided services, the researchers and infrastructure experimenters, because of the knowledge gained from hands-on study and analysis, and the service providers, because of the highlighted potential business exploitation of the network.

The purpose of this special issue is to present the landscape of recent progress in mobile and wireless test beds. In a collection of twelve articles, this issue shows advances from the computing, networking and services perspective, providing insight into the importance and challenges of mobile networking in future communication environments.

We start the issue with a review of the evolution of experimentation facilities related to the improvements in wireless mesh networking. It is clear that no single wireless network will exist on its own, but will be deployed in combination with others. In the first article by Blywis et al., it is shown how wireless mesh networking can act as an integrator for other wireless networks like sensor networks or personal area networks. However to extensively test this integration, the article advocates a move away from the simulation environment, and shows how more real world studies can be achieved in a dedicated test bed-based research environment.

The second article of this issue shows a complete test campaign to evaluate power consumption associated with mobile data communication. The paper by Díaz Zayas et al., provides an extensive analysis of the different factors influencing the power consumption of data connections on mobile devices taking into account the access technology in use, the applications and protocols involved, including physical link level management details and specific cellular technology aspects such as handovers. Interestingly, the paper highlights a software tool which turns commercial smart phones into powerful test systems, negating the need for custom made mobile handset prototypes in the testbed.

The third article by Botta et al., looks at how distributed test beds can play a fundamental role in the evaluation of disruptive innovation for the future Internet. The paper highlights how the authors managed to successfully provide 3G connectivity to stationary PlanetLab Europe nodes. A description of the usage model for granting access to the UMTS connection within a slice and the technical challenges faced while trying to integrate such support in a PlanetLab-based environment is detailed.

The fourth article by Blum et al., tackles the issues around enabling rapid communication service design. The paper describes work on a policy-based service broker which allows for the definition of request- and service-specific policies serving as service contracts that have been implemented as part of the Open SOA telco playground test bed.

As was highlighted in an earlier article, the fifth paper of this issue also makes it clear that current cellular telecommunication networks are made up of several radio networks integrated together to provide a complex system in terms of architecture and management. The large number of possible faults in software, hardware, the configuration and the environment, makes troubleshooting a complex task. The paper by Skehill et al., highlights how automation of troubleshooting will allow mobile operators to alleviate the burden of troubleshooting teams and to shorten the time necessary to identify faults and, thus, reduce the time in which the network suffers from poor performance. The paper goes on to describe a UMTS/WLAN test platform that is built according to 3GPP and IEEE standards. The platform is used to introduce common faults and produce key performance indicators (KPI) similar to real world networks.

The sixth article by De Moor et al., focuses on the perceived quality of experience (QoE) of mobile systems, highlighting the fragmented nature of the literature on QoE and its related concepts of quality of service and user experience in the mobile environment. This fragmentation has resulted in still largely unknown factors which affect mobile QoE and how users’ subjective experiences of such applications and services could be adequately identified and optimized. The paper goes on to present the relationship between technical parameters and the human experience and sets forth a conceptual framework for the multi-dimensional evaluation of quality of experience in a mobile, real-life environment.

The seventh article in this issue highlights the need to control access of mobile users to network access services such that only authenticated mobile users are allowed to access the service. However, in this environment handover key management and re-authentication causes a major problem when it comes to bandwidth demanding applications such as VoIP and video conferencing. To this end, the paper by Marin-Lopez et al., presents an architecture for fast re-authentication based on the well-known Kerberos protocol, where multi-realm handoff scenarios are used to find a tradeoff between the extensible authentication protocol (EAP) with recursive Kerberos cross-realm ticket operation and full EAP authentication. A description of the wireless test bed prototype used to prove the feasibility of the architecture and to obtain experimental results for the bootstrapping and handoff phases is also highlighted in the paper.

In the eighth article of this special issue, Schreiner et al. depicts the architecture, principles, and functionality of a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)-based research infrastructure as it is currently prototyped at Fraunhofer FOKUS to enable dynamic service composition for multiple network technologies. The principles developed in the context of this work are applied to composition mechanisms enabling custom tailored test beds in a distributed test bed federation and composition of adaptive networks based on temporary service requirements.

The ninth article by Alay et al., addresses the problem of video multicast over wireless local area networks (WLANs) with multi-rate capability. The authors present a scheme that dynamically adapts the transmission rate and forward error correction (FEC) rate for multicast video sessions. The paper also describes the open source device driver implementation of the proposed scheme, and presents test bed experimental results to demonstrate the achievable improvements on multicast video.

The tenth article by Walker et al., investigates scalability issues with the MeshTest wireless test bed. The test bed uses shielded enclosures and a matrix switch of programmable attenuators to produce multi-hop scenarios and simulate the effect of mobility and fading. The authors evaluate two potential designs for a scalable version of the MeshTest test bed. They show how to adopt a multi-switch system to make MeshTest scalable and how to improve test bed performance.

The eleventh paper by Zhao at al., describes an experimental study on utility function selection and its impact on streaming video performance with an IEEE 802.22 WRAN base station (BS) cognitive engine (CE) test bed developed at Virginia Tech. They show that significant improvements on received video quality can be achieved when the CE adopts a dynamic, content-aware, video-specific utility function rather than a static, predefined, general purpose utility function.

The last article in this special issue by Wellens and Mähönen presents an extensive spectrum occupancy measurement study, as well as lessons learned from the measurements. Such a measurement study provides motivation for dynamic spectrum access (DSA). The authors compare measurement results gathered at three locations and show differences in the background noise processes. A new model for the duty cycle distribution is also developed that has multiple applications in DSA research.

These twelve papers comprise the special issue on advances in wireless test beds and research infrastructures, an issue which covers a breath and depth of research in the field. We conclude with a special word of thanks to all of the authors who submitted their articles, to the many reviewers for giving their time to provide invaluable feedback, and to the Springer production staff of MONET for all of their help and patience. Finally a word of thanks goes to Professor Imrich Chlamtac whose guidance and support has been very much appreciated.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Ponce de Leon
    • 1
  • Shiwen Mao
    • 2
  • Frank Steuer
    • 3
  • Jens Schumacher
    • 4
  • Thomas Magedanz
    • 5
  • Raheem A. Beyah
    • 6
  • Scott Midkiff
    • 7
  1. 1.Telecommunications Software & Systems Group (TSSG), Waterford Institute of TechnologyWaterfordIreland
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringAuburn UniversityAuburnUSA
  3. 3.Technische Universität Berlin, DAI-LaborBerlinGermany
  4. 4.University of Applied Sciences VorarlbergDornbinAustria
  5. 5.Institute for Telecommunications SystemsTechnische Universität BerlinBerlinGermany
  6. 6.Communications Assurance and Performance Group, Department of Computer ScienceGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA
  7. 7.Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations