Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 13, Issue 3–4, pp 274–284 | Cite as

Power Efficient Video Multipath Transmission over Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks

  • Ilias Politis
  • Michail Tsagkaropoulos
  • Tasos Dagiuklas
  • Stavros Kotsopoulos
Article

Abstract

This paper proposes a power efficient multipath video packet scheduling scheme for minimum video distortion transmission (optimised Video QoS) over wireless multimedia sensor networks. The transmission of video packets over multiple paths in a wireless sensor network improves the aggregate data rate of the network and minimizes the traffic load handled by each node. However, due to the lossy behavior of the wireless channel the aggregate transmission rate cannot always support the requested video source data rate. In such cases a packet scheduling algorithm is applied that can selectively drop combinations of video packets prior to transmission to adapt the source requirements to the channel capacity. The scheduling algorithm selects the less important video packets to drop using a recursive distortion prediction model. This model predicts accurately the resulting video distortion in case of isolated errors, burst of errors and errors separated by a lag. Two scheduling algorithms are proposed in this paper. The Baseline scheme is a simplified scheduler that can only decide upon which packet can be dropped prior to transmission based on the packet’s impact on the video distortion. This algorithm is compared against the Power aware packet scheduling that is an extension of the Baseline capable of estimating the power that will be consumed by each node in every available path depending on its traffic load, during the transmission. The proposed Power aware packet scheduling is able to identify the available paths connecting the video source to the receiver and schedule the packet transmission among the selected paths according to the perceived video QoS (Peak Signal to Noise Ratio—PSNR) and the energy efficiency of the participating wireless video sensor nodes, by dropping packets if necessary based on the distortion prediction model. The simulation results indicate that the proposed Power aware video packet scheduling can achieve energy efficiency in the wireless multimedia sensor network by minimizing the power dissipation across all nodes, while the perceived video quality is kept to very high levels even at extreme network conditions (many sensor nodes dropped due to power consumption and high background noise in the channel).

Keywords

multipath routing power aware packet scheduling video distortion prediction model WMSN 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the project PENEDNo.03636, which is funded in 75% by the European Social Fund and in 25% by the Greek State—General Secretariat for Research and Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Jiancong Chen, S-H Gary Chan, Victor O. K. Li (2004) Multipath routing for video delivery over bandwidth-limited networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 22(10), DecemberGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H (2002) An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 1(4):660–670 OctoberCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.264 reference software version. Fraunhofer Institute, Image Processing Department, available from http://ip.hhi.de
  4. 4.
    Golubchik L, Lui J, Tung T, Chow A, Lee W (2002) Multi-path continuous media streaming: what are the benefits? Journal of Performance Evaluation 49Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen J, Chan S-H (2001) Multipath routing for video unicast over bandwidth-limited networks. In Proceedings of IEEE GlobecomGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakareski J, Girod B (2003) Server diversity in rate-distortion optimized media Streaming. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee YC, Altunbasak Y, Mesereau RM (2003) Optimal packet scheduling for multiple description coded video transmissions over lossy networks. In Proceedings of IEEE GlobecomGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stuhlmuller K, Farber N, Link M, Girod B (2000) Analysis of video transmission over lossy channels. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 18(6):1012–1032 JuneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim I, Kim H (2002) A new resource allocation scheme based on a PSNR criterion for wireless video transmission to stationary receivers over Gaussian channels. IEEE Trans. on Wireless Communications 1(3):393–401 JulyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liang Y, Apostolopoulos J, Girod B (2003) Analysis of packet loss for compressed video: does burst-length matter. in Proc. Int’l Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Hong Kong, China, AprilGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Politis I, Tsagkaropoulos M, Pliakas T, Dagiuklas T, Kotsopoulos S (2007) Intelligence packet scheduling for optimized video transmission over wireless networks. in Proc. 3rd International Mobile Multimedia Communications Conference, Nafpaktos, Greece, AugustGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Apostolopoulos J, Tan W, Wornell G (2002) Modeling path diversity for multiple video communications. in ICASSP02 Conference Proceedings, May 2002Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iso/iec 14496-10 and itu-t rec., h.264 standard, advanced video coding, 2003Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schulzrinne H. Rtp: A transport protocol real-time applications. RFC 1889, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilias Politis
    • 1
  • Michail Tsagkaropoulos
    • 1
  • Tasos Dagiuklas
    • 2
  • Stavros Kotsopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of PatrasRioGreece
  2. 2.Technological Educational Institute of MessolonghiNafpaktosGreece

Personalised recommendations