Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 12, Issue 2–3, pp 155–171 | Cite as

Activity Recognition for Context-aware Hospital Applications: Issues and Opportunities for the Deployment of Pervasive Networks

  • Jesus Favela
  • Monica Tentori
  • Luis A. Castro
  • Victor M. Gonzalez
  • Elisa B. Moran
  • Ana I. Martínez-García
Article

Abstract

Hospitals are convenient settings for the deployment of context-aware applications. The information needs of hospital workers are highly dependent on contextual variables, such as location, role and activity. While some of these parameters can be easily determined, others, such as activity are much more complex to estimate. This paper describes an approach to estimate the activity being performed by hospital workers. The approach is based on information gathered from a workplace study conducted in a hospital, in which 196 h of detailed observation of hospital workers was recorded. Contextual information, such as the location of hospital workers, artifacts being used, the people with whom they collaborate and the time of the day, is used to train a back propagation neural network to estimate hospital workers activities. The activities estimated include clinical case assessment, patient care, preparation, information management, coordination and classes and certification. The results indicate that the user activity can be correctly estimated 75% of the time (on average) which is good enough for several applications. We discuss how these results can be used in the design of activity-aware applications, arguing that recent advances in pervasive and networking technologies hold great promises for the deployment of such applications.

Keywords

activity estimation context-aware computing hospital activities neural networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abowd GD, Mynatt ED (2000) Charting past, present, and future research in ubiquitous computing. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact (TOCHI) 7(1):29–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abowd G, Mynatt E (2002) The human experience. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1(1):48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardram JE (2004) Applications of context-aware computing in hospital work: examples and design principles. In: ACM symposium on applied computing. ACM Press, Nicosia, Cyprus, pp 1574–1579Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bardram JE, Bossen C (2005) Mobility work: the spatial dimension of collaboration at a hospital. In: ECSCW. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Paris, France, pp 176–185Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bian X, Abowd, GD, Rehg JM (2004) Using sound source localization to monitor and infer activities in the Home. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, Technical Report; GIT-GVU-04-20Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bossen C (2002) The parameters of common information spaces: the heterogeneity of cooperative work at a hospital ward. In: CSCW. Kluwer, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 176–185Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camacho J, Favela J, Gonzalez VM (2006) Supporting the management of multiple activities in mobile collaborative working environments. In: CRIWG. Springer, Valladolid, Spain, pp 381–388Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chen M, Haehnel D, Hightower J, Sohn T, LaMarca A, Smith I, Chmelev D, Hughes J, Potter F (2006) Practical metropolitan-scale positioning for GSM Phones. In: 8th international conference on ubiquitous computing. Springer, Orange County, CA, USA, pp 225–242Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chin T (2005) Untapped power: a physician’s handheld. AMNews, Danville, KYGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen HB (2002) Using logic programming to detect activities in pervasive healthcare. In: International conference on logic programming. Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 21–436Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork DG (2000) Pattern classification. Wiley, NYGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Favela J, Tentori M, Markarian A, Castro LA, Amaya I (2006) Integrating heterogeneous devices in support of local mobility. In: 12th Americas Conference on Information Systems. Association for Information Systems, Acapulco, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fishkin KP, Jiang B, Philipose M, Roy S (2004) I sense a disturbance in the force: unobtrusive detection of interactions with RFID-tagged objects. Ubicomp, Innsbruck, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fogarty J, Hudson SE, Atkeson CG, Avrahami D, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S, Lee JC, Yang J (2005) Predicting human interruptibility with sensors interruptibility with sensors. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 12(1):119–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    González V, Mark G (2004) Constant, constant, multi-tasking craziness: managing multiple working spheres. In: CHI. ACM Press, Vienna, Austria, pp 113–120Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Greenberg S (2001) Context as a dynamic construct. Hum-Comput Interact 16(2–4):257–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hightower J, Borriello G (2001) Location systems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Comput:57–66Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Intille S, Larson K, Kukla C (2000) House_n: The MIT home of the future project. Department of Architecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krumm J, Hinckley K (2004) The NearMe wireless proximity server. Ubicomp, Innsbruck, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Krumm J, Horvitz E (2004) LOCADIO: inferring motion and location from Wi-Fi signal strengths. In: First annual international conference on mobile and ubiquitous systems: networking and services. IEEE Press, Boston, MA, USA, pp 4–13Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lapinsky J, Weshler S, Mehta M, Varkul D, Hallett T, Stewart T (2001) Handheld computers in critical care. Crit Care 5(4):227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee SW, Mase K (2002) Activity and location recognition using wearable sensors. IEEE Pervasive Computing 1(3):24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moran EB, Tentori M, González VM, Martinez-Garcia AI, Favela J (2006) Mobility in hospital work: towards a pervasive computing hospital environment. Int J Electron Healthcare 3(1):72–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Munguia ET, Intille SS, Larson K (2004) Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In: Pervasive. LNCS Springer, Heidelberg, pp 158–175Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Munoz M, Rodriguez MD, Favela J, Martinez-Garcia AI, Gonzalez VM (2003) Context-aware mobile communication in hospitals. IEEE Comput 36(9):38–46Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naya F, Noma H, Ohmura R, Kogure K (2005) Bluetooth-based indoor proximity sensing for nursing context awareness. In: IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Connor MC (2006) Testing ultrasound to track, monitor patients. RFID J 1(31):2Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Patwari N, Ash JN, Kyperountas S, Hero Lii AO, Moses RL, Correal NS (2005) Locating the nodes: cooperative localization in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Signal Process Mag 22:54–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pentland A (2004) Healthwear: medical technology becomes wearable. IEE Comput 37(5):42–49Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Philipose M, Fishkin KP, Perkowi M (2004) Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(4):50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reddy M, Dourish P (2002) A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work. In: Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 344–353Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stanford V (2003) Beam me up, Doctor McCoy. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2(3):13–18CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Weiser M (1998) The future of ubiquitous computing on campus. Commun ACM 41(1):41–42CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesus Favela
    • 1
  • Monica Tentori
    • 1
  • Luis A. Castro
    • 1
  • Victor M. Gonzalez
    • 2
  • Elisa B. Moran
    • 1
  • Ana I. Martínez-García
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentCICESEEnsenadaMexico
  2. 2.School of InformaticsUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations