Mobile Networks and Applications

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 811–824 | Cite as

An Efficient and Robust Computational Framework for Studying Lifetime and Information Capacity in Sensor Networks

  • Enrique J. Duarte-Melo
  • Mingyan Liu
  • Archan Misra
Article

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the expected lifetime and information capacity, defined as the maximum amount of data (bits) transferred before the first sensor node death due to energy depletion, of a data-gathering wireless sensor network. We develop a fluid-flow based computational framework that extends the existing approach, which requires precise knowledge of the layout/deployment of the network, i.e., exact sensor positions. Our method, on the other hand, views a specific network deployment as a particular instance (sample path) from an underlying distribution of sensor node layouts and sensor data rates. To compute the expected information capacity under this distribution-based viewpoint, we model parameters such as the node density, the energy density and the sensed data rate as continuous spatial functions. This continuous-space flow model is then discretized into grids and solved using a linear programming approach. Numerical studies show that this model produces very accurate results, compared to averaging over results from random instances of deployment, with significantly less computation. Moreover, we develop a robust version of the linear program, which generates robust solutions that apply not just to a specific deployment, but also to topologies that are appropriately perturbed versions. This is especially important for a network designer studying the fundamental lifetime limit of a family of network layouts, since the lifetime of specific network deployment instances may differ appreciably. As an example of this model's use, we determine the optimal node distribution for a linear network and study the properties of optimal routing that maximizes the lifetime of the network.

Keywords

mathematical programming linear program optimization system design wireless sensor networks lifetime capacity sensor deployment node distribution optimal routing fluid flow model robustness stability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, Robust truss topology design via semidefinite programming, SIAM Journal on Optimization 7(4)(1997) 991–1016.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, Robust convex optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research 23(4) (1998) 769–805.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    A. Ben-Tal and A. Nemirovski, Robust solutions to uncertain linear programs. Operations Research Letters 25 (1999) 1–13.CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. Bhardwaj and A.P. Chandrakasan, Bounding the lifetime of sensor networks via optimal role assignments, in: Annual Joint Conferences of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies (INFOCOM) New York (2002) pp. 1587–1596.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Bhardwaj, T. Garnett and A.P. Chandrakasan, Upper bounds on the lifetime of sensor networks, in: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 3 (2001) 785–790.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J. Chang and L. Tassiulas, Energy conserving routing in wireless adhoc networks, in: Annual Joint Conferences of the IEEE Computer and Communication Societies (INFOCOM) (Tel Aviv, Israel), Vol. 1 (2000) pp. 22–31.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Coleri, M. Ergen and T. Koo, Lifetime analysis of a sensor network with hybrid automata modeling, in: 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA) (Atlanta, Georgia, 2002) pp. 98–104.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    E.J. Duarte-Melo, M. Liu and A. Misra, A computational approach to the joint design of distributed data compression and data dissemination in a field-gathering wireless sensor network, in: Forty-First Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (2003) pp. 70–79.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Gomez and A. Campbell, Power-aware routing optimization for wireless ad hoc networks, in: High Speed Networks Workshop (HSN) (Balatonfured, Hungary, 2001).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. Heinzelman, A. Chandrakasan and H. Balakrishnan, Energy efficient communications protocols for wireless microsensor networks, in: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS '00) Vol. 8 (2000) pp. 8020.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    S. Lindsey and C. Raghavendra, PEGASIS: Power efficient gathering in sensor information systems, IEEE Aerospace Conference 3 (2002) 1125–1130.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    K.G. Murty, Linear Programming (John Wiley and Sons, 1983).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    S.S. Pradhan and K. Ramchandran, Distributed source coding: Symmetric rates and applications to sensor networks, in: IEEE Data Compression Conference (DCC) (Snowbird, Utah, 2000) pp. 363– 372.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique J. Duarte-Melo
    • 1
  • Mingyan Liu
    • 1
  • Archan Misra
    • 2
  1. 1.Electrical Engineering and Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  2. 2.T. J. Watson Research Center at IBMNY

Personalised recommendations