Advertisement

Evaluation of reference genes for quantitative real-time PCR in Wharton’s Jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells after lentiviral transduction and differentiation

  • P. BorkowskaEmail author
  • A. Zielińska
  • M. Paul-Samojedny
  • R. Stojko
  • J. Kowalski
Original Article

Abstract

Quantitative real time reverse transcription PCR, qRT-PCR, is one of the most important techniques for assessing the level of gene expression. Selecting the correct reference gene to normalize the results is a key step in this method. Inaccurate data can be generated if the correct reference gene is not selected. The level of the expression of reference genes is tissue-variable, and in the case of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), it can be different depending on the source of their origin. The aim of this study was to select the reference gene for Wharton’s Jelly-derived MSC (WJ- MSC) that were undergoing transduction and differentiation. In this work, the expression of 32 genes was analyzed, of which two (RPS17 and 18S rRNA), which had the most stable expression level, were selected. A comparative analysis of the expression stability of the selected genes was then performed with the genes that are most commonly used in the literature, i.e. β-actin and GAPDH. Next, it was determined that a false picture of the expression level of the studied genes can be obtained when a reference gene with variable expression level is used for normalization. RPS17 and 18S rRNA proved to be the most stable reference genes for the WJ-MSC that had been subjected to the lentiviral transfection procedure followed by differentiation. The expression of β-actin and GAPDH was highly unstable and therefore these genes are not suitable for use as reference genes in studies involving WJ- MSC.

Keywords

Mesenchymal stem cells GAPDH Β-actin 18S rRNA RPS17 Reference gene 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant from Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland (KNW-1-064/N/9/B).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Amable PR, Teixeira MVT, Carias RBV, Granjeiro JMG, Borojevic R (2013) Identification of appropriate reference genes for human mesenchymal cells during expansion and differentiation. PLoS ONE 8(9):e73792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeon RH, Lee WJ, Son YB, Bharti D, Shivakumar SB, Lee SL, Rho GJ (2019) PPIA, HPRT1, and YWHAZ genes are suitable for normalization of mRNA expression in long-term expanded human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomed Res Int 21(2019):3093545Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nandy SB, Mohanty S, Singh M, Behari M, Airan B (2014) Fibroblast growth factor-2 alone as an efficient inducer for differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells into dopaminergic neurons. J Biomed Sci 21(1):83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee OK, Kuo TK, Chen WM, Lee KD, Hsieh SL, Chen TH (2004) Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Blood 103:1669–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scheper V, Schwieger J, Hamm A, Lenarz T, Hoffmann A (2019) BDNF-overexpressing human mesenchymal stem cells mediate increased neuronal protection in vitro. J Neuro Res 97(11):1414–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lejkowska R, Kawa MP, Pius-Sadowska E, Rogińska D, Łuczkowska K, Machaliński B, Machalińska A (2019) Preclinical evaluation of long-term neuroprotective effects of BDNF-engineered mesenchymal stromal cells as intravitreal therapy for chronić retinal degeneration in Rd6 mutant mice. Int J Mol Sci 20(3):777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ramakers C, Ruijter JM, Deprez RH, Moorman AF (2003) Assumption-free analysis of quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) data. Neurosci Lett 339:62–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pfaffl MW (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Kluter H, Biebak K (2006) Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 24:1294–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee R, Kim B, Choi I, Kim H, Choi H, Suh K, Bae YC, Jung JS (2004) Characterization and expression analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow and adipose tissue. Cell Physiol Biochem 14:311–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Burk J, Ribitsch I, Gittel C, Juelke H, Kasper C, Staszczyk C, Brehm W (2013) Growth and differentiation characteristics of equine mesenchymal stromal cells derived from different sources. Vet J 195:98–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ranera B, Lyahyai J, Romero A, Vazquez FJ, Remacha AR, Bernal ML, Zaragoza P, Rodellar C, Martin-Burriel I (2011) Immunophenotype and gene expression profiles of cell surface markers of mesenchymal stem cells derived from equine bone marrow and adipose tissue. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 144:147–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nazari F, Parham A, Maleki AF (2005) GAPDH, β-actin and β2-microglobulin, as three common reference genes, are not reliable for gene expression studies in equine adipose- and marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J Anim Sci 57:18Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Glare EM, Divjak M, Bailey MJ, Walters EH (2002) β-Actin and GAPDH housekeeping gene expression in asthmatic airways is variable and not suitable for normalising mRNA levels. Thorax 57:765–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin J, Redies C (2012) Histological evidence: housekeeping genes beta-actin and GAPDH are of limited value for normalization of gene expression. Dev Genes Evol 222:369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trzaska KA, Kuzhikandathil EV, Rameshwar P (2007) Specification of a dopaminergic phenotype from adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 25:2797–2808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh M, Kakkar A, Sharma R, Kharbanda OP, Monga N, Kumar M, Chowdhary S, Airan B, Mohanty S (2017) Synergistic effect of BDNF and FGF2 in efficient generation of functional dopaminergic neurons from human mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep 7:10378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang YW, Davis EG, Bai J (2009) Determination of internal control for gene expression studies in equine tissues and cell culture using quantitative RT-PCR. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 130:114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bustin S, Penning LC (2012) Improving the analysis of quantitative PCR data in veterinary research. Vet J 191:279–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chooi WH, Zhou R, Yeo SS, Zhang F, Wang DA (2013) Determination and validation of reference gene stability for qPCR analysis in polysaccharide hydrogel-based 3D chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cell cultural models. Mol Biotechnol 54:623–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical GeneticsMedical University of SilesiaSosnowiecPoland
  2. 2.School of Health Sciences in KatowiceMedical University of SilesiaKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations