Identification and evaluation of reference genes for reliable normalization of real-time quantitative PCR data in acerola fruit, leaf, and flower
Understanding into acerola (Malpighia emarginata) molecular and biochemical bases is still obscure, despite it is one of the most important natural source of vitamin C for humans. Recently, our research group published the first data on acerola transcriptome generating valuable information to identify reference genes for RT-qPCR in this species. Hence, this study aimed to identify the most stably expressed genes based on acerola transcriptome data, and further to evaluate the suitability of F-box, U3, Merad50-ATPase, TGD4, NOB1, PA-RNA, RCC1, RBL and PGAL candidates for accurate gene expression normalization in leaf, flower and fruit at 12, 16 and 20 days after anthesis using RT-qPCR analysis. Three algorithms, geNorm, NormFinder, and BestKeeper confirmed the expression stability of all nine candidate reference genes, whereas RefFinder consensually summarized a comprehensive gene ranking. Based on geNorm, the combination of the most stable reference genes RBL and U3 for leaf/flower group, TGD4, F-box and PGAL (fruit developmental stages or fruit/leaf), RCC1, PGAL and RBL (fruit/flower) and RCC1, RBL, TGD4 and PGAL (total samples) were required for accurate normalization. Moreover, the use of these reference genes to assess the expression profile of GMP1 and NAT3 genes confirmed the reliability of ranking and defined the best combination of genes recommended by geNorm and RefFinder. This work will benefit further RT-qPCR studies in these acerola organs by offering a foundation for accurate normalization of gene expression profiling.
KeywordsAcerola Reference genes RT-qPCR Expression stability Validation
CPS, KDCS, and JHC conceived and designed research. CPS, KDCS and, TAG performed the experiments. CPS, KDCS, and MCB analyzed data. CPS wrote the manuscript. All authors read, commented on, and approved the manuscript.
This research was supported by CNPq, CAPES, and FUNCAP. CPS acknowledge doctoral grants from CNPq. JHC is grateful to CNPq for the Researcher fellowship (CNPq Grant 309795/2017-6).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- 1.Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Ørntoft TF (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res 64:5245–5250. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0496 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Badejo AA, Jeong ST, Goto-Yamamoto N, Esaka M (2007) Cloning and expression of GDP-d-mannose pyrophosphorylase gene and ascorbic acid content of acerola (Malpighia glabra L.) fruit at ripening stages. Plant Physiol Biochem 45:665–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.07.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Badejo AA, Tanaka N, Esaka M (2008) Analysis of GDP-d-mannose pyrophosphorylase gene promoter from acerola (Malpighia glabra) and increase in ascorbate content of transgenic tobacco expressing the acerola gene. Plant Cell Physiol 49:126–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm164 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Badejo AA, Wada K, Gao Y et al (2012) Translocation and the alternative d-galacturonate pathway contribute to increasing the ascorbate level in ripening tomato fruits together with the d-mannose/L-galactose pathway. J Exp Bot 63:229–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err275 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Costa JH, Saraiva KDC, Morais VD et al (2016) Reference gene identification for real-time PCR analyses in soybean leaves under fungus (Cercospora kikuchii) infection and treatments with salicylic and jasmonic acids. Australas Plant Pathol 45:191–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-016-0403-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Eltelib HA, Badejo AA, Fujikawa Y, Esaka M (2011) Gene expression of monodehydroascorbate reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase during fruit ripening and in response to environmental stresses in acerola (Malpighia glabra). J Plant Physiol 168:619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.09.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gachomo EW, Jimenez-Lopez JC, Baptiste LJ, Kotchoni SO (2014) GIGANTUS1 (GTS1), a member of Transducin/WD40 protein superfamily, controls seed germination, growth and biomass accumulation through ribosome-biogenesis protein interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 14:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Galli V, Borowski JM, Perin EC et al (2015) Validation of reference genes for accurate normalization of gene expression for real time-quantitative PCR in strawberry fruits using different cultivars and osmotic stresses. Gene 554:205–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2014.10.049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.González-Agüero M, García-Rojas M, Di Genova A et al (2013) Identification of two putative reference genes from grapevine suitable for gene expression analysis in berry and related tissues derived from RNA-Seq data. BMC Genomics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-878 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 27.Gutierrez L, Mauriat M, Guénin S et al (2008) The lack of a systematic validation of reference genes: a serious pitfall undervalued in reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 6:609–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00346.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Ibort P, Molina S, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Aroca R (2018) Involvement of a never ripe receptor in the interaction between two beneficial soil bacteria and tomato plants under well-watered and drought conditions. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 31:633–650. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI-12-17-0292-R CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Kudo T, Sasaki Y, Terashima S et al (2016) Integrated brond band communication systems in Belgium identification of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis using large-scale RNA-seq data of Arabidopsis thaliana and model crop plants. Genes Genet Syst 91:111–125. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.1986.1146346 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 44.Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP (2004) Determination of most stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: BestKeeper©—Excel spreadsheet tool using a repeated pair-wise correlation and regression analysis. Biotechnol Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00395.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Saraiva KDC, Fernandes de Melo D, Morais VD et al (2014) Selection of suitable soybean EF1α genes as internal controls for real-time PCR analyses of tissues during plant development and under stress conditions. Plant Cell Rep 33:1453–1465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1628-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Yeap WC, Loo JM, Wong YC, Kulaveerasingam H (2014) Evaluation of suitable reference genes for qRT-PCR gene expression normalization in reproductive, vegetative tissues and during fruit development in oil palm. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 116:55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0382-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar