Advertisement

Molecular characterization of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from commercial insectaries in Mexico

  • Martín Palomares-Pérez
  • Cecilia Moreno-Rodriguez
  • Yadira Contreras-Bermúdez
  • Hugo C. Arredondo-Bernal
  • Adrien GallouEmail author
Short Communication
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

The larvae of the Chrysoperla carnea-group (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) are recognized among the most effective larval predators of various phytophagous arthropods. Therefore, green lacewings are commonly grown by commercial insectaries and released as biological control agents. Previous work has shown that commercial laboratories frequently supply indeterminate species of the large C. carnea cryptic species complex. In Mexico, at least 20 biological control companies have commercialized the species C. carnea, but none of the products reared by those companies have been analyzed scientifically. Thus, the goal of this work was to molecularly characterize nine C. carnea populations from Mexican insectaries using the most efficient molecular markers available: the mitochondrial genes COI, COII, ND2, and ND5. Phylogenetic analysis demonstrated a unique mitochondrial haplotype in seven commercial insectaries showing 100% similarity to the reference specimen C. plorabunda E100. In contrast, we observed two and four different mitochondrial haplotypes of the carnea-group in two commercial insectaries. More precisely, three specimens possessed the mitochondrial haplotype of the species C. zastrowi, suggesting possible natural occurrence of this haplotype in Mexico. Consequently, this study demonstrated the need for an extensive survey of the different laboratories and insectaries producing C. carnea in Mexico, including unambiguous species identification by song recordings to confirm the species identity of the observed mitochondrial haplotypes.

Keywords

Chrysoperla plorabunda Chrysoperla zastrowi Chrysoperla zastrowi sillemi Green lacewings Mitochondrial haplotype Carnea-group 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the technician C. Manuel Bravo-Núñez for his valuable support in C. carnea (sensu lato) production. We acknowledge Charles S. Henry (University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA) for helpful discussions, comments, and English editing that greatly improved the manuscript.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11033_2019_5034_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Fitch A (1856) First and second reports on the noxious, beneficial and other insects of the state of New York. New York Dept of Agriculture, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duelli P, Obrist MK, Fluckiger PF (2002) Forest edges are biodiversity hotspots–also for Neuroptera. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 48:75–87Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steinmann H (1964) The chrysopa species (Neuroptera) of Hungary. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici (Zoologica) 56:257–266Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Duelli P, Johnson JB, Wells MM, Mochizuki A (2013) Obligatory duetting behaviour in the Chrysoperla carnea-group of cryptic species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): its role in shaping evolutionary history. Biol Rev 88:787–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tjeder B (1960) Neuroptera from Newfoundland, Miquelon, and Labrador. Opusc Ent 25:146–149Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Johnson JB, Mochizuki A, Mirmoayedi A, Duelli P (2018) Distinctive but functionally convergent song phenotypes characterize two new allopatric species of the Chrysoperla carnea-group in Asia, Chrysoperla shahrudensis sp. nov. and Chrysoperla bolti sp. nov. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Nat Hist 52:1603–1635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Henry CS, Wells MLM (2007) Can what we don’t know about lacewing systematics hurt us? A cautionary tale about mass rearing and release of “Chrysoperla carnea” (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Am Entomol 53:42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Duelli P, Johnson JB, Wells MLM, Mochizuki A (2012) Parallel evolution in courtship songs of North American and European green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Biol J Linn Soc 105:776–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Price BW, Henry CS, Hall A, Mochizuki A, Duelli P, Brooks SJ (2015) Singing from the grave: DNA from a 180 year old type specimen confirms the identity of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens). PLoS ONE 10:e0121127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Johnson JB, Mochizuki A, Duelli PA (2014) New cryptic species of the Chrysoperla carnea-group (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from western Asia: parallel speciation without ecological adaptation. Syst Entomol 39:380–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Winterton S, de Freitas S (2006) Molecular phylogeny of the green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Aust J Entomol 45:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haruyama N, Mochizuki A, Duelli P, Naka H, Nomura M (2008) Green lacewing phylogeny, based on three nuclear genes (Chrysopidae, Neuroptera). Syst Entomol 33:275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mochizuki A, Henry CS, Duelli P (2017) Apertochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): A heterogeneric phantom? Zootaxa 4238:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McEwen PK, New TRR, Whittington A (2001) Lacewings in the crop management. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michaud JP (2001) Evaluation of green lacewings, Chrysoperla plorabunda (Fitch) (Neuroptera) augmentative release against Toxoptera citricida (Homoptera: Aphididae) in citrus. J Appl Ent 122:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Lenteren JC, Roskam MM, Timmer R (1997) Commercial mass production and pricing of organisms for biological control of pests in Europe. Biol Control 10:143–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    O’Neil RJ, Giles KL, Obrycki JJ, Mahr DL, Legaspi JC, Katovich K (1998) Evaluation of the quality of four commercially available natural enemies. Biol Control 11:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burmeister HCC (1839) Handbuch der Entomologie. Theod Chr Friedr, Enslin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brooks SJ (1994) A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Bull Br Mus Nat Hist Entomol 63:137–210Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fitch A (1855) Report upon the noxious and other insects of the State of New York. Tran NY State Agric Soc 14:705–880Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lacroix JL (1912) Deux variétés nouvelles de Chrysopides [Nevr.]. Bull Soc Entomol 1912:351–353Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tauber MJ, Tauber CA, Daane KM, Hagen KS (2000) Commercialization of predators: recent lessons from green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Am Entomol 46:26–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duelli P (2001) Lacewings in field crops. In: McEwen PK, New TR, Whittington AE (eds) Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 158–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Palomares-Pérez M, Barajas-Romero MI, Arredondo-Bernal HC (2017) Mass production of Ceraeochrysa valida (Banks) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) at 30°C. Chilean J Agric Anim Sci, ex Agro-Ciencia 33:187–191Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985) Dating the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Duelli P, Johnson JB (2006) Courtship song of the South African lacewing Chrysoperla zastrowi (Esben-Petersen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): evidence for a trans-equatorial geographic range? J Nat Hist 40:2173–2195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Henry CS, Brooks SJ, Johnson JB, Venkatesan T, Duelli P (2010) The most important lacewing species in Indian agricultural crops, Chrysoperla sillemi (Esben-Petersen), is a subspecies of Chrysoperla zastrowi (Esben-Petersen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J Nat Hist 44:2543–2555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mochizuki A, Mitsunaga T (2004) Non-target impact assessment of the introduced green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on the indigenous sibling species, C. nipponensis (Okamoto) through interspecific predation. Appl Entomol Zool 39:217–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Naka H, Haruyama N, Ito K, Mitsunaga T, Nomura M, Mochizuki A (2006) Interspecific hybridization between introduced and indigenous green lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla) at different adult densities. J Appl Ent 130:426–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McKay BD, Zink RM (2010) The causes of mitochondrial DNA gene tree paraphyly in birds. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:647–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro Nacional de Referencia de Control BiológicoTecománMexico

Personalised recommendations