Advertisement

Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 3315–3324 | Cite as

In silico screening of sugar alcohol compounds to inhibit viral matrix protein VP40 of Ebola virus

  • Nagasundaram NagarajanEmail author
  • Edward K. Y. Yapp
  • Nguyen Quoc Khanh Le
  • Hui-Yuan YehEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Ebola virus is a virulent pathogen that causes highly lethal hemorrhagic fever in human and non-human species. The rapid growth of this virus infection has made the scenario increasingly complicated to control the disease. Receptor viral matrix protein (VP40) is highly responsible for the replication and budding of progeny virus. The binding of RNA to VP40 could be the crucial factor for the successful lifecycle of the Ebola virus. In this study, we aimed to identify the potential drug that could inhibit VP40. Sugar alcohols were enrich with antiviral properties used to inhibit VP40. Virtual screening analysis was perform for the 48 sugar alcohol compounds, of which the following three compounds show the best binding affinity: Sorbitol, Mannitol and Galactitol. To understand the perfect binding orientation and the strength of non-bonded interactions, individual molecular docking studies were perform for the best hits. Further molecular dynamics studies were conduct to analyze the efficacy between the protein–ligand complexes and it was identify that Sorbitol obtains the highest efficacy. The best-screened compounds obtained drug-like property and were less toxic, which could be use as a potential lead compound to develop anti-Ebola drugs.

Keywords

Ebola VP40 Sugar alcohols Molecular docking Molecular dynamics simulations 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors take this opportunity to thank the Nanyang Technological University for providing the facilities and for encouragement to carry out this work.

Author contributions

NN and HYY were involved in designing the experiments. The acquisition, analysis and the interpretation of the data were carry out by NN, HYY, EKYY, and NQKL. All the authors approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Sullivan N, Yang ZY, Nabel GJ (2003) Ebola virus pathogenesis: implications for vaccines and therapies. J Virol 77:9733–9737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dessen A, Volchkov V, Dolnik O, Klenk HD, Weissenhorn W (2000) Crystal structure of the matrix protein VP40 from Ebola virus. EMBO J 19:4228–4236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson RF, McCarthy SE, Godlewski PJ, Harty RN (2006) Ebola virus VP35-VP40 interaction is sufficient for packaging 3E-5E minigenome RNA into virus-like particles. J Virol 11:5135–5144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hoenen T, Biedenkopf N, Zielecki F, Jung S, Groseth A, Feldmann H, Becker S (2010) Oligomerization of Ebola virus VP40 is essential for particle morphogenesis and regulation of viral transcription. J Virol 84:7053–7063CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sullivan N, Yang ZY, Nabel GJ (2003) Ebola virus pathogenesis: implications for vaccines and therapies. J Virol 77:9733–9737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oany AR, Sharmin T, Chowdhury AS, Jyoti TP, Hasan MA (2015) Highly conserved regions in Ebola virus RNA dependent RNA polymerase may be act as a universal novel peptide vaccine target: a computational approach. Silico Pharmacol 3(1):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Timmins J, Schoehn G, Ricard-Blum S, Scianimanico S, Vernet T, Ruigrok RW, Weissenhorn W (2003) Ebola virus matrix protein VP40 interaction with human cellular factors Tsg101 and Nedd4. J Mol Biol 326:493–502CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gomis-Ruth FX, Dessen A, Timmins J, Bracher A, Kolesnikowa L, Becker S, Klenk HD, Weissenhorn W (2003) The matrix protein VP40 from Ebola virus octamerizes into pore-like structures with specific RNA binding properties. Structure 11(4):423–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hartlieb B, Weissenhorn W (2006) Filovirus assembly and budding. Virology 344(1):64–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee JE, Fusco ML, Hessell AJ, Oswald WB, Burton DR, Saphire EO (2008) Structure of the Ebola virus glycoprotein bound to an antibody from a human survivor. Nature 454(7201):177–182CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mathew S, Al Thani AA, Yassine HM (2018) Computational screening of known broad-spectrum antiviral small organic molecules for potential influenza HA stem inhibitors. PLoS ONE 5:4.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203148 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7:306–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hess B, Kutzner C, van der Spoel D, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J Chem Theory Comput 4(3):435–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Gunsteren FW, Billeter SR, Eising AA, Hunenberger PH, Kruger P, Mark AE, Scott WRP, Tironi IG (1996) Biomolecular simulation: the GROMOS96 manual and user guide. Zurich, BiomosGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455–461PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS, Olson AJ (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30:2785–2791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindahl Erik, Hess Berk, van der Spoel David (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7:306–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drwal MN, Banerjee P, Dunkel M, Wettig MR, Preissner R (2014) ProTox: a web server for the in silico prediction of rodent oral toxicity. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W53–W58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ertl P, Rohde B, Selzer P (2000) Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. J Med Chem 43:3714–3717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muegge I (2003) Selection criteria for drug like compounds. Med Res Rev 23:302–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lipinski CA, Lombardo F, Dominy BW, Feeney PJ (2001) Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 46:3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karthick V, Nagasundaram N, Doss CGP, Chakraborty C, Siva R, Lu A, Zhang G, Zhu H (2016) Virtual screening of the inhibitors targeting at the viral protein 40 of Ebola virus. Infect Dis Poverty 5:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rispin A, Farrar D, Margosches E, Gupta K, Stitzel K, Carr G, Greene M, Meyer W, McCall D (2002) Alternative methods for the median lethal dose (LD(50)) test: the up-and-down procedure for acute oral toxicity. ILAR J 43:233–243CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of HumanitiesNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Singapore Institute of Manufacturing TechnologySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations