Advertisement

Isolation and characterization of a novel seed-specific promoter from peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

  • Cuiling Yuan
  • Chunjuan Li
  • Caixia Yan
  • Xiaobo Zhao
  • Juan Wang
  • Quanxi SunEmail author
  • Shihua ShanEmail author
Original Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Peanut, whose seeds are ideal bioreactors for the production of recombinant proteins and/or nutrient metabolites, is one of the most important crop species worldwide. As important molecular tools, seed-specific promoters (SSPs) can direct the expression of foreign proteins specifically in seeds to avoid constitutive expression that can damage plants. However, few SSPs have been identified from this species. In this study, we isolated a novel SSP (we named it AHSSP2) from peanut. Several cis-acting elements commonly found in SSPs, including 3 copies of RYREPEAT elements, were dispersed throughout the 1970-bp sequence of AHSSP2. The sequence was then substituted in place of the 35S promoter sequence in a pBI121 plasmid, which was subsequently transformed into Arabidopsis. Beta-glucuronidase (GUS) staining showed that AHSSP2 can drive GUS gene expression in the mature seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis, excluding within the testa. The cotyledons and hypocotyls of the germinating seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings also exhibited GUS activity, even after the seedlings became adult plants. No GUS activity was detected in nontransformed Arabidopsis at any stage. These results strongly suggested that AHSSP2 could drive the expression of foreign genes in a seed-specific manner. This study enriched SSP resources, and the results showed that AHSSP2 could be potentially utilized in peanut and other crop species to improve seed quality, such as modifications to seed oil content.

Keywords

Peanut Seed-specific promoter GUS histochemical staining Transgenic Arabidopsis plants 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31601336), Taishan Scholar Funding (ts201712080), Shandong Elite Variety Project (2017LZN033, 2017LZGC003), Youth Science Foundation of the Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (2016YQN17), and Shandong Key Research and Development Project (2016GGH4518).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Xu N, Wang R, Zhao L, Zhang C, Li Z, Lei Z, Liu F, Guan P, Chu Z, Crawford NM, Wang Y (2016) The Arabidopsis NRG2 protein mediates nitrate signaling and interacts with and regulates key nitrate regulators. Plant Cell 28:485–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pessina S, Angeli D, Martens S, Visser RG, Bai Y, Salamini F, Velasco R, Schouten HJ, Malnoy M (2016) The knock-down of the expression of MdMLO19 reduces susceptibility to powdery mildew (Podosphaera leucotricha) in apple (Malus domestica). Plant Biotechnol J 14(2016):2033–2044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang JY, Qu SC, Qiao YS, Zhang Z, Guo ZR (2014) Overexpression of the Malus hupehensis MhNPR1 gene increased tolerance to salt and osmotic stress in transgenic tobacco. Mol Biol Rep 41:1553–1561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun Y, Xu W, Jia Y, Wang M, Xia G (2015) The wheat TaGBF1 gene is involved in the blue-light response and salt tolerance. Plant J 84:1219–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wei ZY, Zhang YY, Wang YP, Fan MX, Zhong XF, Xu N, Lin F, Xing SC (2016) Production of bioactive recombinant bovine chymosin in tobacco plants. Int J Mol Sci 17:624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aluru M, Xu Y, Guo R, Wang Z, Li S, White W, Wang K, Rodermel S (2008) Generation of transgenic maize with enhanced provitamin A content. J Exp Bot 59:3551–3562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baisakh N, Rehana S, Rai M, Oliva N, Tan J, Mackill DJ, Khush GS, Datta K, Datta SK (2006) Marker-free transgenic (MFT) near-isogenic introgression lines (NIILs) of ‘golden’ indica rice (cv. IR64) with accumulation of provitamin A in the endosperm tissue. Plant Biotechnol J 4:467–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu X, Yang W, Mu B, Li S, Li Y, Zhou X, Zhang C, Fan Y, Chen R (2018) Engineering of ‘Purple Embryo Maize’ with a multigene expression system derived from a bidirectional promoter and self-cleaving 2A peptides. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1107–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH (1985) Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature 313:810–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen AH, Sharrock RA, Quail PH (1992) Maize polyubiquitin genes: structure, thermal perturbation of expression and transcript splicing, and promoter activity following transfer to protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Mol Biol 18:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hsieh TH, Lee JT, Charng YY, Chan MT (2002) Tomato plants ectopically expressing Arabidopsis CBF1 show enhanced resistance to water deficit stress. Plant Physiol 130:618–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kasuga M, Liu Q, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K (1999) Improving plant drought, salt, and freezing tolerance by gene transfer of a single stress-inducible transcription factor. Nat Biotechnol 17:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kasuga M, Miura S, Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K (2004) A combination of the Arabidopsis DREB1A gene and stress-inducible rd29A promoter improved drought-and low-temperature stress tolerance in tobacco by gene transfer. Plant Cell Physiol 45:346–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sun Q, Liu J, Li Y, Zhang Q, Shan S, Li X, Qi B (2013) Creation and validation of a widely applicable multiple gene transfer vector system for stable transformation in plant. Plant Mol Biol 83:391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tang G, Xu P, Liu W, Liu Z, Shan L (2015) Cloning and characterization of 5’ flanking regulatory sequences of AhLEC1B gene from Arachis Hypogaea L. PLoS ONE 10:e0139213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sunkara S, Bhatnagar-Mathur P, Sharma KK (2014) Isolation and functional characterization of a novel seed-specific promoter region from peanut. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De WC, Van HH, De BS, Angenon G, De JG, Depicker A (2000) Plants as bioreactors for protein production: avoiding the problem of transgene silencing. Plant Mol Biol 43:347–359Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abbadi A, Domergue F, Bauer J, Napier JA, Welti R, Zahringer U, Cirpus P, Heinz E (2004) Biosynthesis of very-long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in transgenic oilseeds: constraints on their accumulation. Plant Cell 16:2734–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Naqvi S, Farré G, Sanahuja G, Capell T, Zhu C, Christou P (2010) When more is better: multigene engineering in plants. Trends Plant Sci 15:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paik-Ro OG, Seib JC, Smith RL (2002) Seed-specific, developmentally regulated genes of peanut. Theor Appl Genet 104(236–240):23Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chi X, Hu R, Yang Q, Zhang X, Pan L, Chen N, Chen M, Yang Z, Wang T, He Y (2012) Validation of reference genes for gene expression studies in peanut by quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Mol Genet Genomics 287:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Higo K, Ugawa Y, Iwamoto M, Higo H (1998) PLACE: a database of plant cis-acting regulatory DNA elements. Nucleic Acids Res 26:358–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rombauts S, Van MM, Rouze P, Dehais P (1999) PlantCARE, a plant cis-acting regulatory element database. Nucleic Acids Res 27:295–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Clough SJ, Bent AF (1998) Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 16:735–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jefferson RA, Kavanagh TA, Bevan MW (1987) GUS fusions: beta-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Grace ML, Chandrasekharan MB, Hall TC, Crowe AJ (2004) Sequence and spacing of TATA box elements are critical for accurate initiation from the β-phaseolin promoter. J Biol Chem 279:8102–8110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shirsat A, Wilford N, Croy R, Boulter D (1989) Sequences responsible for the tissue specific promoter activity of a pea legumin gene in tobacco. Mol Genet Genomics 215:326–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ezcurra I, Ellerström M, Wycliffe P, Stålberg K, Rask L (1999) Interaction between composite elements in the napA promoter: both the B-box ABA-responsive complex and the RY/G complex are necessary for seed-specific expression. Plant Mol Biol 40:699–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liu X, Tian J, Zhou X, Chen R, Wang L, Zhang C, Zhao J, Fan Y (2014) Identification and characterization of promoters specifically and strongly expressed in maize embryos. Plant Biotechnol J 12:1286–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stålberg K, Ellerström M, Josefsson LG, Rask L (1993) Deletion analysis of a 2S seed storage protein promoter of Brassica napus in transgenic tobacco. Plant Mol Biol 23:671–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stålberg K, Ellerstöm M, Ezcurra I, Ablov S, Rask L (1996) Disruption of an overlapping E-box/ABRE motif abolished high transcription of the napA storage-protein promoter in transgenic Brassica napus seeds. Planta 199:515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thomas MS, Flavell RB (1990) Identification of an enhancer element for the endosperm-specific expression of high molecular weight glutenin. Plant Cell 2:1171–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Paine JA, Shipton CA, Chaggar S, Howells RM, Kennedy MJ, Vernon G, Wright SY, Hinchliffe E, Adams JL, Silverstone AL, Drake R (2005) Improving the nutritional value of golden rice through increased pro-vitamin A content. Nat Biotechnol 23:482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhu Q, Yu S, Zeng D, Liu H, Wang H, Yang Z, Xie X, Shen R, Tan J, Li H (2017) Development of “purple endosperm rice” by engineering anthocyanin biosynthesis in the endosperm with a high-efficiency transgene stacking system. Mol Plant 10:918–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wu G, Truksa M, Datla N, Vrinten P, Bauer J, Zank T, Cirpus P, Heinz E, Qiu X (2005) Stepwise engineering to produce high yields of very long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in plants. Nat Biotechnol 23:1013–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee PF, Hsing YIC, Tehyuan C (2000) Promoter activity of a soybean gene encoding a seed maturation protein, GmPM9. Bot Bull Acad Sinica 41:175–182Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chung KJ, Hwang SK, Hahn BS, Kim KH, Kim JB, Kim YH, Yang JS, Ha SH (2008) Authentic seed-specific activity of the Perilla oleosin 19 gene promoter in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep 27:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xue M, Long Y, Zhao Z, Huang G, Huang K, Zhang T, Jiang Y, Yuan Q, Pei X (2018) Isolation and characterization of a green-tissue promoter from common wild rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.). Int J Mol Sci 19:2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Artico S, Lambret-Frotté J, Nardeli SM, Oliveira-Neto OB, Grossi-De-Sa MF, Alves-Ferreira M (2013) Isolation and characterization of three new promoters from Gossypium hirsutum that show high activity in reproductive tissues. Plant Mol Biol Rep 32:630–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tian Y, Lv X, Xie G, Zhang J, Xu Y, Chen F (2018) Seed-specific overexpression of AtFAX1 increases seed oil content in Arabidopsis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 500:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Aoyagi T, Kobayashi M, Kozaki A (2018) Design of a seed-specific chimeric promoter with a modified expression profile to improve seed oil content. Int J Mol Sci 19:1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tang G, Xu P, Ma W, Wang F, Liu Z, Wan S, Shan L (2018) Seed-Specific Expression of AtLEC1 increased oil content and altered fatty acid composition in seeds of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Front Plant Sci 9:260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu F, Xia Y, Wu L, Fu D, Hayward A, Luo J, Yan X, Xiong X, Fu P, Wu G, Lu C (2015) Enhanced seed oil content by overexpressing genes related to triacylglyceride synthesis. Gene 557:163–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kim HJ, Kim HY, Suh MC (2012) Efficiency for increasing seed oil content using WRINKLED1 and DGAT1 under the control of two seed-specific promoters, FAE1 and Napin. J Plant Biotechnol 39:242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wood CC, Okada S, Taylor MC, Menon A, Mathew A, Culerne D, Stephen SJ, Allen RS (2018) Seed-specific RNAi in safflower generates a superhigh oleic oil with extended oxidative stability. Plant Biotechnol J 16:1788–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Wang C, Yang X, Ma H, Liu J, Chen J, Zhang J, Dong S, Qi B, Li X (2017) Production of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) in maize (Zea mays L.) through the alternative ∆8 desaturation pathway mediated by particle bombardment. Acta Physiol Plant 39:110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wang C, Qing X, Yu M, Sun Q, Liu F, Qi B, Li X (2019) Production of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5n-3) in transgenic peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) through the alternative Delta8-desaturase pathway. Mol Biol Rep 46(1):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shandong Peanut Research InstituteQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations