Advertisement

Development and characterization of novel microsatellite loci for the Blue-fronted Amazon (Amazona aestiva, Psittaciformes, Aves) and cross-species amplification for other two threatened Amazona species

  • Gislaine Aparecida Fernandes
  • Sarah Dobkowski-Marinho
  • Victor Fernandes Santos
  • Cássia Alves Lima-Rezende
  • Helder Elias da Silva
  • Fernando Pacheco Rodrigues
  • Renato Caparroz
Short Communication

Abstract

Parrots are among the most threatened avian groups of the world, with illegal pet trade being a major threat to some Amazon (Amazona genus) and macaw (Ara and Anodorhynchus genera) species. Population genetic studies and effective control of commercial breeders are important actions for the conservation of these parrot species; however, few microsatellite loci are available for most Amazona species to date. In this study, 25 polymorphic microsatellite loci were identified in silico and characterized for the Blue-fronted Amazon [Amazona aestiva (Aa)]. Loci were tested in 24 Blue-fronted Amazons from wild population from central Brazil with cross-species amplified in two individuals of Amazona vinacea (Av) and Amazona pretrei (Ap) from northeastern Minas Gerais and Rio Grande do Sul, in southeastern and south of Brazil, respectively. The number of alleles per locus for Aa ranged from 5 to 24 with an average of 13.1. Twenty-four and 25 loci were successfully amplified for Av and Ap, respectively. The observed and expected heterozygosities for Aa ranged from 0.27 to 1.00 and from 0.35 to 0.94, with averages of 0.75 and 0.85, respectively. Nine loci significantly deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium after Bonferroni correction (likely due to null alleles) and no significant linkage disequilibrium between loci pairs was detected. The combined paternity exclusion probability was very high, and the probability of identity was extremely low. This new set of microsatellite loci will be useful for analyzing population genetic structure and making conservation and management decisions, as well as for parentage analysis and the control of commercial breeding of Aa and potentially other Amazona species.

Keywords

NGS Parrots Amazona vinacea Amazona pretrei Population structure Paternity exclusion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thanks to Jaime Martinez, Nêmora Pauletti Prestes, Tânia de Freitas Raso and Frederico Fontanelli for providing samples of wild individuals of the Vinaceous-breasted Amazon and Red-spectacled Amazon. We are also very grateful to the anonymous referees for the evaluation of our paper and for the constructive critics. This work was supported by CAPES Edital Programa Ciências Forenses no 25/2014 “Pró-forenses” (Grant Processo 23038.006832/2014-11).

Author Contributions

All authors planned and designed the research. G.A.F. and R.C. carried out the sampling, the laboratory work and performed the molecular analysis. G.A.F and R.C. wrote the manuscript with the help of the other authors. S.D.M and V.F.S were undergraduate student when this research was development, but now they are graduate students. G.A.F and H.E.S are Ph.D. students, C.A.L-R is a postgraduate student and F.P.R and R.C. are professor at the Universidade de Brasília.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the paper.

Research involving animal and human participants

The experiments complied with the current laws of Brazil. The samples collection was conducted under authorization of the responsible authority Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio) using the Licenses SISBIO 12.130 and 25694-4. The research project was approved by the UnB Ethics Committee UnBDoC No 55712/2016.

References

  1. 1.
    IUCN (2018) The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2018-1. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 20 Sep 2018
  2. 2.
    Snyder N, McGowan P, Gilardi J, Grajal A (2000) Parrots: status survey and conservation action plan 2000–2004. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berkunsky I, Quillfeldt P, Brightsmith DJ, Abbud MC, Aguilar JMRE et al (2017) Current threats faced by Neotropical parrot populations. Biol Conserv 214:278–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Collar N, Kirwan GM, Boesman P (2018) Turquoise-fronted Amazon (Amazona aestiva). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Editions, Barcelona. https://www.hbw.com/node/54749. Accessed 22 Sep 2018
  5. 5.
    Piacentini VQ, Aleixo A, Agne CE, Maurício GN, Pacheco JF et al (2015) Annotated checklist of the birds of Brazil by the Brazilian Ornithological Records Committee. Rev Bras Ornitol 23:291–298Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ICMBio (2011) Plano de ação nacional para a conservação dos papagaios da Mata Atlântica. Brasília. http://www.icmbio.gov.br/portal/faunabrasileira/plano-de-acao-nacional-lista/837-plano-de-acao-nacional-para-conservacao-dos-papagaios-da-mata-atlantica
  7. 7.
    Seixas GHF, Mourão GM (2002) Nesting success and hatching survival of the Blue-fronted Amazon (Amazona aestiva) in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. J Field Ornithol 73:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Waples RS, Gaggiotti O (2006) What is a population? An empirical evaluation of some genetic methods for identifying the number of gene pools and their degree of connectivity. Mol Ecol 15:1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schlötterer C (2000) Evolutionary dynamics of microsatellite DNA. Chromosoma 109:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Russello MA, Calcagnotto D, De Salle R, Amato G (2001) Characterization of microsatellite loci in the endangered St. Vicent Parrot, Amazona guildingii. Mol Ecol Notes 1:13–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russello M, Lin K, Amato G, Caccone A (2005) Additional microsatellite loci for the endangered St. Vincent Parrot, Amazona guildingii. Conserv Genet 6:643–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Taylor TD, Parkin DT (2007) Characterization of 13 microsatellite loci for the Moluccan Cockatoo, Cacatua moluccensis, and Cuban Amazon, Amazona leucocephala, and their conservation and utility in other parrot species (Psittaciformes). Conserv Genet 8:991–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jan C, Fumagalli L (2016) Polymorphic DNA microsatellite markers for forensic individual identification and parentage analyses of seven threatened species of parrots (family Psittacidae). PeerJ 4:e2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Caparroz R, Leite KCE, Chinalia LA, Myiaki CY, Collevatti RG (2007) Characterization of microsatellite loci in three species of Amazona (Psittaciformes) using heterologous primers. Ornitol Neotrop 18:439–444Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gebhardt KJ, Waits LP (2008) Cross-species amplification and optimization of microsatellite markers for use in six Neotropical parrots. Mol Ecol Resour 4:835–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Presti FT, Wasko AP (2014) A review of microsatellite markers and their application on genetic diversity studies in parrots. Open J Genet.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojgen.2014.42010 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brufford MW, Hanotte O, Brookfield JFY, Burke T (1992) Single and multilocus DNA fingerprinting. In: Hoelzel AR (ed) Molecular genetic analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford University Press, New York, pp 225–269Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faircloth BC (2008) MsatCommander: detection of microsatellite repeat arrays and automated, locus-specific primer design. Mol Ecol Resour 8:92–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rozen S, Skaletsky H (2000) Primer 3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Krawetz S, Misener S (eds) Bioinformatics methods and protocols: methods in molecular biology. The Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, pp 365–386Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Owczarzy R, Tataurov AV, Wu Y, Manthey JA, McQuisten KA et al (2008) IDT SciTools: a suite for analysis and design of nucleic acid oligomers. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W163–W169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M et al (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wagner HW, Sefc KM (1999) IDENTITY 1.0. (version 4.0). Centre for Applied Genetics, University of Agricultural Sciences, Vienna. http://www.uni-graz.at/~sefck
  25. 25.
    Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Mol Ecol 14:599–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gislaine Aparecida Fernandes
    • 1
  • Sarah Dobkowski-Marinho
    • 1
  • Victor Fernandes Santos
    • 1
  • Cássia Alves Lima-Rezende
    • 1
  • Helder Elias da Silva
    • 1
  • Fernando Pacheco Rodrigues
    • 1
  • Renato Caparroz
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratório de Genética e Biodiversidade, Departamento de Genética e Morfologia, Instituto de Ciências BiológicasUniversidade de BrasíliaBrasíliaBrazil

Personalised recommendations