Advertisement

Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1533–1538 | Cite as

Development and characterization of 22 polymorphic microsatellites of the Andean frog Telmatobius chusmisensis (Anura, Telmatobius) and cross amplification in seven Chilean species of the genus

  • Alejandra Fabres
  • Pablo Fibla
  • Carolina Araya
  • Michel Sallaberry
  • Marco A. Méndez
Short Communication
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

The genus Telmatobius Wiegmann, 1834 is composed of a wide variety of species and is one of the most diverse native components of the high-altitude Andean environments. The species of the genus present in Chile are considered as endangered, critically endangered or data deficient. We isolated and evaluated 44 microsatellites in 80 individuals of 8 species of Telmatobius present in Chile, obtaining 22 polymorphic microsatellite loci for Telmatobius chusmisensis. The cross-amplification test was successful in all other species tested. For the first time, microsatellite markers are described for Telmatobius. The description of these primers will be useful for further genetic studies for T. chusmisensis and other species of the same genus; allowing further analyses of population structuring, dispersal patterns, recent demographic history and population effective size. This information is also significant to undertake conservation actions for the species of the genus Telmatobius, since most species have conservation issues.

Keywords

Telmatobius Microsatellites Conservation genetics IUCN 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Cruz, M. Valladares, P. Sáez and K. Otalora for their help in fieldwork and L. Eaton for his comments on the manuscript. P. Fibla thanks CONICYT PCHA/Doctorado Nacional/2014-21140355. This study was funded by Proyecto CONICYT-FONDECYT 1140540 (MM), and authorized by the Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero Resolución Exenta # 3037 and #5679. All the procedures carried out in this study were approved by the Bioethics Committee of the University of Chile (CICUA) resolution 131004FCS-UCH/s.

Funding

This study was funded by Proyecto CONICYT-FONDECYT (1140540).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involved human participants and/or animals

This study was authorized by the Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero Resolución Exenta # 3037 and #5679 (CL) and by the Bioethics Committee of the University of Chile (CICUA) resolution 131004FCS-UCH/s.

References

  1. 1.
    Frost DR (2017) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 (Date of access). American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. Electronic database accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html. Accessed 12 Feb 2018
  2. 2.
    De la Riva IJ, Harvey MB (2003) A new species of Telmatobius from Bolivia and a redescription of T. simonsi Parker, 1940 (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Herpetologica 59(1):127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seimon TA, Seimon A, Daszak P, Halloy SRP, Schloegel LM, Aguilar CA, Sowell P, Hyatt AD, Konecky B, Simmons JE (2007) Upward range extension of Andean anurans and chytridiomycosis to extreme elevations in response to tropical deglaciation. Glob Change Biol 13(1):288–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fibla P, Sáez PA, Salinas H, Araya C, Sallaberry M, Méndez MA (2017) The taxonomic status of two Telmatobius frog species (Anura: Telmatobiidae) from the western Andean slopes of northernmost Chile. Zootaxa 4250(4):301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sáez PA, Fibla P, Correa C, Sallaberry M, Salinas H, Veloso A, Mella J, Iturra P, Méndez MA (2014) A new endemic lineage of the Andean frog genus Telmatobius (Anura, Telmatobiidae) from the western slopes of the central Andes. Zool J Lin Soc 171(4):769–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Correa C, Donoso JP, Ortiz JC (2016) Estado de conocimiento y conservación de los anfibios de Chile: una síntesis de los últimos 10 años de investigación. Gayana (Concepción) 80:103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Formas JR, Cuevas CC, Nuñez JJ (2006) A new species of Telmatobius (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from northern Chile. Herpetologica 62(2):173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veloso A, Trueb L (1976) Description of a new species of telmatobiine frog, Telmatobius (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae), from the Andes of northern Chile. Occas Pap Mus Nat Hist, Univ Kansas 62:1–10Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soto-Azat C, Valenzuela-Sánchez A, Ortíz JC, Díaz-Páez H, Castro C, Charrier A, Correa C, Cuevas C, Lobos G, Méndez MA, Penna M, Peñafiel-Ricaurte A, Rabanal F, Vélez-R CM, Vidal MA, Angulo A (2015) ASG Chile leads update of the extinction risk of Chilean amphibians for the IUCN Red List of threatened species. FrogLog 23(4):116Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barrionuevo JS (2017) Frogs at the summits: phylogeny of the Andean frogs of the genus Telmatobius (Anura, Telmatobiidae) based on phenotypic characters. Cladistics 33:41–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benavides E, Ortiz JC, Sites JW (2002) Species boundaries among the Telmatobius (Anura: Leptodactylidae) of the lake Titicaca basin: allozyme and morphological evidence. Herpetologica 58(1):31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    De la Riva I, García-París M, Parra-Olea G (2010) Systematics of Bolivian frogs of the genus Telmatobius (Anura, Ceratophryidae) based on mtDNA sequences. Syst Biodivers 8(1):49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wiens JJ (1993) Systematics of the leptodactylid frog genus Telmatobius in the Andes of northern Peru. Occas Pap Mus Nat Hist Univ Kans 162:1–76Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Benavides E (2005) The Telmatobius species complex in Lake Titicaca: applying phylogeographic and coalescent approaches to evolutionary studies of highly polymorphic Andean frogs. In: Lavilla EO, De la Riva I (eds) Estudio sobre las rana andinas de los géneros Telmatobius y Batrachophrynus (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Monografías de Herpetología, 7. Asociación Herpetológica Española, Valencia, pp 167–185Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Victoriano PF, Muñoz-Mendoza C, Sáez PA, Salinas HF, Muñoz-Ramírez C, Sallaberry M, Fibla P, Méndez MA (2015) Evolution and conservation on top of the world: phylogeography of the marbled water frog (Species Complex; Anura, Telmatobiidae) in Protected Areas of Chile. J Hered 106(S1):546–559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitchell MA (2009) Anesthetic considerations for amphibians. J Exot Pet Med 18(1):40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18(2):233–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996–2004) GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows™ pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratorio de Genética y Evolución, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación AgropecuariasSantiagoChile
  3. 3.Laboratorio de Zoología de Vertebrados, Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de CienciasUniversidad de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations