Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 333–339 | Cite as

Polymorphism and methylation of the MC4R gene in obese and non-obese dogs

  • Monika Mankowska
  • Joanna Nowacka-Woszuk
  • Aneta Graczyk
  • Paulina Ciazynska
  • Monika Stachowiak
  • Marek Switonski
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

The dog is considered to be a useful biomedical model for human diseases and disorders, including obesity. One of the numerous genes associated with human polygenic obesity is MC4R, encoding the melanocortin 4 receptor. The aim of our study was to analyze polymorphisms and methylation of the canine MC4R in relation to adiposity. Altogether 270 dogs representing four breeds predisposed to obesity: Labrador Retriever (n = 187), Golden Retriever (n = 38), Beagle (n = 28) and Cocker Spaniel (n = 17), were studied. The dogs were classified into three groups: lean, overweight and obese, according to the 5-point Body Condition Score (BCS) scale. In the cohort of Labradors a complete phenotypic data (age, sex, neutering status, body weight and BCS) were collected for 127 dogs. The entire coding sequence as well as 5′ and 3′-flanking regions of the studied gene were sequenced and six polymorphic sites were reported. Genotype frequencies differed considerably between breeds and Labrador Retrievers appeared to be the less polymorphic. Moreover, distribution of some polymorphic variants differed significantly (P < 0.05) between small cohorts with diverse BCS in Golden Retrievers (c.777T>C, c.868C>T and c.*33C>G) and Beagles (c.-435T>C and c.637G>T). On the contrary, in Labradors no association between the studied polymorphisms and BCS or body weight was observed. Methylation analysis, using bisulfite DNA conversion followed by Sanger sequencing, was carried out for 12 dogs with BCS = 3 and 12 dogs with BCS = 5. Two intragenic CpG islands, containing 19 cytosines, were analyzed and the methylation profile did not differ significantly between lean and obese animals. We conclude that an association of the MC4R gene polymorphism with dog obesity or body weight is unlikely, in spite of the fact that some associations were found in small cohorts of Beagles and Golden Retrievers. Also methylation level of this gene is not related with dog adiposity.

Keywords

MC4R Obesity Body weight Methylation Labrador Retriever Golden Retriever Beagle 

Introduction

Since dogs share the same environment and lifestyle with humans they are also susceptible to the same civilization-related diseases and among them obesity has become an emerging health problem in both species. An overall obesity rate in dogs ranges from 25.0% in Australia to 59.3% in UK [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. It may be underestimated, because in certain breeds (e.g. Labrador Retriever) individuals considered as being in a good body condition are in fact overweight [6]. Except for obvious positive outcomes for dogs’ welfare itself, the reason to study obesity in this species is due to its model role for human diseases and their therapies [7].

The melanocortin receptor gene family consists of five members and one of them, MC4R, has attracted special attention due to its crucial role in energy homeostasis [8]. Numerous reports show that some mutations in this gene cause monogenic obesity in humans [9]. Moreover, a meta-analysis revealed an association of several DNA variants located within the MC4R gene or in its vicinity with the accumulation of adipose tissue [10]. Some variants, p.Val103Ile and p.Ile251Leu, play a protective role [9], while rs17782313 (SNP C/T), located almost 188 kb upstream from this gene, predisposes to polygenic obesity [11] and is associated both with eating behavior [12] and physical activity [13].

Until now 19 polymorphic sites were reported in the canine MC4R gene or in its vicinity (NCBI SNP database http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/). Some of them were analyzed for an association with obesity, body weight or measures, but the obtained results were ambiguous, possibly due to small cohorts analyzed [14, 15, 16].

Epigenetic mechanisms, e.g. DNA methylation, may also play an important role in pathogenesis of some diseases, including obesity and type 2 diabetes [17, 18]. It was shown that high-fat diet alters methylation pattern of the mice Mc4r gene [19]. Until now no reports are available on the methylation profile of the canine MC4R gene. Taking the above into consideration we aimed to search for polymorphisms in coding and flanking sequences of the MC4R gene, as well as analyze its methylation level in obese and non-obese dogs.

Materials and methods

Blood samples from 270 dogs (130 males and 140 females, among them 181 intact and 89 neutered) were collected. Dogs had no record of any medical problems and were sampled during standard veterinarian visit with the consent of their owners. The studied cohort was composed of dogs with well-known obesity susceptibility: Labrador Retrievers (n = 187), Golden Retrievers (n = 38), Beagles (n = 28) and Cocker Spaniels (n = 17). All individuals were annotated to an appropriate Body Condition Score (BCS) group, based on visual and palpable assessment. For the purpose of our study we have chosen a 5-point BCS scale: 3—normal (n = 108), 4—overweight (n = 97) and 5—obese (n = 65). However, complete phenotypic data including: sex, age, neutered status, body weight and BCS could be collected for: 127 Labrador Retrievers (Supplementary Table S1), 24 Golden Retrievers, 7 Beagles and 6 Cocker Spaniels. Thus, detailed analysis of association between MC4R polymorphism and BCS, as well as body weight was performed for Labradors, only.

DNA sequencing

DNA from blood was extracted using the BloodMini Isolation Kit (A&A Biotechnology) protocol. For further analysis a coding sequence of the MC4R gene (999 bp, GenBank NC_006583.3) with adjacent 5′ and 3′ regions was amplified in four PCRs, covering over 2000 bp. Amplification was performed with primers designed by Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/; Supplementary Table S2) applying to the following conditions—initial denaturation (94 °C; 5 min), 35 cycles of denaturation (94 °C; 40 s), annealing (respective temperatures in Supplementary Table S2; 30 s) and elongation (72 °C; 40 s); the final elongation (72 °C; 10 min). Prior to sequencing PCR products were purified with Alkaline phosphatase and Exonuclease I (Thermo Fisher Scientific), amplified with the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and filtrated on Sephadex G50 (Sigma). Sequencing was performed on a Genetic Analyzer 3130 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

Methylation analysis

Based on the reference genomic sequence (NC_006583.3) the in silico studies of the MC4R gene and an upstream region of 1000 bp was inspected in terms of the CpG islands (CGI) existence using the CpGPlot software (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/seqstats/emboss_cpgplot/). Two short CGIs (159 and 146 bp in length) were found in the coding sequence of the gene and the PCR primers were designed using the MethPrimer software (http://www.urogene.org/cgi-bin/methprimer/methprimer.cgi): 5′F: TGAGTTTTTTGGTAAAGGTTATTT; 5′R: CTACAATTAAAAACAAACTACAAATC. The amplicon length was 350 bp and overlapped with 19 CG dinucleotides (Supplementary Fig. S1). The analysis was performed for 24 animals classified as BCS = 3 (n = 12) and BCS = 5 (n = 12), representing three breeds: Labrador Retriever (n = 12), Golden Retriever (n = 6) and Beagle (n = 6).

After extraction from blood (Epicentre), 1 µg of DNA was bisulfite converted according to the EZ DNA Methylation kit (ZymoResearch) protocol and amplified with touch-down PCR (for the initial 8 cycles the annealing temperature was decreased by 0.5 °C per cycle in a range from 60 to 56 °C, while for the next 32 cycles primers were annealed at 56 °C). The PCR products were cloned into the pGEM T-Easy Vector (Promega) following transformation of DH5α competent cells (Invitrogen) by heat shock and cultured overnight at 37 °C on agar plates with an addition of IPTG, X-gal and ampicillin. For each individual, at least 12 positive (white) colonies were picked and amplified with the Illustra ThempliPhi Amplification Kit (GE Healthcare). In order to quantify the methylation level the clones were sequenced using the Big Dye v1.1 Termination Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on a Genetic Analyzer 3130.

Statistical analysis

Results of DNA sequencing were analyzed with the use of the Lasergene SeqMan software (DNASTAR). Allele and genotype frequencies along with odds ratio values (https://www.medcalc.org/calc/odds_ratio.php) were calculated. The HaploView software [20] was used for haplotype analysis. Additionally, for the largest group of Labrador Retrievers (n = 127) with the complete phenotypic data set a further statistical association analysis was carried out. The genotype, age, sex and neutered status were used as independent variables affecting dependent variable—body weight or BCS. Generalized linear model (GLM) procedure from SAS Enterprise 6.1 package [21] was applied in order to evaluate effects on body weight. For BCS a logistic regression (LOGIT) model was used. The methylation results were analyzed using the QUMA software (http://quma.cdb.riken.jp). The statistical analysis of the methylation level between BCS = 3 and BCS = 5 dogs was performed with the use of the SigmaStat 3.5 software (Systat Software).

Results

Sequence analysis

DNA sequencing of the entire coding sequence of MC4R (999 bp), as well as the 5′-flanking region (541 bp) and the 3′-flanking region (518 bp), revealed six known polymorphic sites. Three of them were found in the coding sequence at positions: c.637G>T (rs852614811), c.777T>C (rs851987283) and c.868C>T (rs851062983). Among them only c.637G>T was a nonsynonymous substitution (p.Val213Phe). Two polymorphisms were identified in the 3′-flanking region: c.*33C>G (rs851539399) and c.*227C>T [14] and one in the 5′-flanking region, at position c.-435T>C (rs852471376).

The alignment of canine 5′ and 3′-flanking sequences to other species (the human, mouse, pig and cattle) led us to the assumption that both polymorphic sites downstream of the coding sequence reside in the 3′UTR. Searching for target sequences for miRNA in this region (miRSearch V3.0; http://www.targetscan.org/) gave a negative result. According to the MatInspector software the appearance of c.-435T>C polymorphism introduces a consensus sequence for the cell cycle-dependent element (CDE) for the CDF-1 factor, which plays a role in cell cycle regulation [22].

Frequency of the detected variants showed considerable differences between breeds. Detailed information on variant frequencies is given in Supplementary Table S3. The lowest level of polymorphism was observed in Labrador Retrievers, where 4 out of 6 detected SNPs had a minor allele frequency (MAF) below 0.05 (Table 1).

Table 1

Frequency of reference variants (according to NC_006583.3) at 6 SNP sites

SNP

Reference variant

Beagle (n = 28)

Cocker Spaniel (n = 17)

Golden Retriever (n = 38)

Labrador Retriever (n = 187)

c.-435T>C

T

0.67

0.91

0.89

0.22

c.637G>T

G

0.59

0.76

0.72

0.96

c.777T>C

T

0.20

0.56

0.13

0.00

c.868C>T

C

1.00

1.00

0.61

1.00

c.*33C>G

C

0.20

0.56

0.13

0.00

c.*227C>T

C

1.00

0.91

0.96

0.24

Haplotype analysis across breeds revealed the presence of 14 haplotypes and their frequency also varied between breeds (Table 2). In Labrador Retrievers the CGCCGT haplotype was predominant: 0.78 (BCS = 3) and 0.73 (BCS = 4 or 5). Interestingly, this haplotype was rarely observed (0.03) in Golden Retrievers with BCS = 3 and was not found in dogs with BCS = 4 or 5. This variant was present neither in Cocker Spaniels nor Beagles.

Table 2

Haplotype frequencies in the studied breeds

Haplotype

Beagle

Cocker Spaniel

Golden Retriever

Labrador Retriever

BCS = 3

BCS = 4 or 5

BCS = 3

BCS = 4 or 5

BCS = 3

BCS = 4 or 5

BCS = 3

BCS = 4 or 5

CGCCGC

0.26

0.31

0.04

0.02

0.03

CGCCGT

0.03

0.78

0.73

TGCCGC

0.11

0.11

0.11

0.12

0.20

0.15

0.18

TGCCGT

0.08

0.02

0.02

CGCTGC

0.07

TGCTGC

0.27

0.41

0.15

CGTCCC

0.12

0.10

CGTCCT

0.13

TGTCCC

0.10

0.31

0.50

0.50

0.10

0.07

TGTCCT

0.03

CTCCGC

0.04

0.03

CTCCGT

0.04

TTCCGC

0.42

0.27

0.27

0.13

0.24

0.28

0.05

0.04

TTCCGT

0.03

The order of SNPs is as follows: c.-435 T>C; c.637G>T; c.777T>C; c.868C>T; c.*33C>G and c.*227C>T

The odds ratio (OR) test, applied for comparison of polymorphic variants distribution in dogs with different BCS revealed significant relationships for 3 SNPs in Golden Retrievers and 2 SNPs in Beagles (Table 3). The most pronounced results were observed in Beagles for c.-435T>C and c.637G>T (p.Val213Phe) polymorphisms when lean (BCS = 3) and obese dogs (BCS = 5), as well as lean and overweight/obese dogs (BCS = 4 or 5) were compared. On the contrary, in the biggest cohort of Labrador Retrievers (n = 187) no association was found.

Table 3

Significant (P < 0.05) associations between SNPs and BCS, revealed by the odds ratio (OR) test

SNP and compared groups in terms of BCS

Breed

Golden Retriever (n = 38)

Beagle (n = 28)

OR

P

OR

P

c.-435T>C

 

ns

  

3 versus 5

 

5.000

0.0275

3 versus 4 and 5

 

3.750

0.0109

c.637G>T (p.Val213Phe)

 

ns

  

3 versus 4

 

6.8571

0.0230

3 versus 4 and 5

 

3.1020

0.0486

c.777T>C

   

ns

3 versus 4 and 5

0.2292

0.0456

 

c.868C>T

   

ns

3 versus 5

0.2909

0.0496

 

c.*33C>G

   

ns

3 versus 4 and 5

0.2292

0.0456

 

ns non-significant

The GLM procedure applied for Labradors revealed significant effects of age and sex on body weight (P < 0.0001). Females were lighter than males with the estimated effect of 3.9 kg and each month estimated effect was +0.07 kg. Neither neutering nor genotypes in MC4R gene influenced body weight. In the LOGIT model statistically significant effects on BCS in Labradors were registered for age (P < 0.0001) and neutering (P = 0.036), while effects of sex and genotype were not significant.

Methylation analysis

The analyzed amplicon (350 bp) contained 19 CG dinucleotides (Supplementary Fig. S1) and a majority of them showed high (over 80%) cytosine methylation. The only exception (Fig. 1) was observed at position c.198 (numbered according to the MC4R gene coding sequence NCBI accession no. NC_006583.3), where the cytosine methylation rate was lower in all analyzed breeds. This cytosine is located between two CGIs. The detailed results are presented in Supplementary Table S4. The statistical analysis (average % of methylation for each cytosine) showed no significant differences either in terms of methylation status between BCS = 3 and BCS = 5 Labrador Retrievers or across all breeds.

Fig. 1

An example of methylation patterns in two Labrador Retrievers, a BCS = 3 and b BCS = 5. Black circle cytosine methylated, white circle cytosine non-methylated. Each line represents particular clone sequencing results. An arrow indicates the cytosine with the lowest methylation (% given above)

Discussion

Association of DNA polymorphisms with dogs’ predisposition to obesity is still poorly recognized. Until now such results have been described for the TNF [23], POMC [14, 24], MC4R [16] and GPR120 [25] genes. However, the observations for the MC4R gene are ambiguous.

In this study we sequenced the MC4R gene of 270 dogs and six previously reported SNPs were found, which segregated in 14 haplotypes. We found that the lowest level of polymorphism was observed in Labrador Retrievers. These results show that the extent of the MC4R polymorphism is much lower than in the human counterpart, for which around 300 variants were reported in the coding, 5′UTR and 3′UTR sequences (NCBI SNP database http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/).

The association analysis of the detected SNPs with the BCS provided no definite results. None of the SNPs showed an across-breed association. A significant association was observed for SNPs: c.777T>C; c.868C>T; c.*33C>G in Golden Retrievers and c.-435T>C, c.637G>T in Beagles, whereas no association was found in Labrador Retrievers and Cocker Spaniels. The most interesting SNP is a nonsynonymous substitution at position c.637G>T (rs852614811, p.Val213Phe). However, functionality of this substitution is rather doubtful, since it is localized within the transmembrane segment of the encoded protein [26] and does not alter ligand binding and signaling properties of the encoded receptor [27]. Thus, the above mentioned association results should be considered with caution, especially due to a small number of dogs analyzed. In Golden Retrievers a significant association was found for c.777T>C (rs851987283). Lack of the association of this SNP was earlier reported in female Beagle dogs by Zeng et al. [16], who described this substitution as 895C>T. Interestingly, another nonsynonymous substitution c.301A>C, reported by those authors as 420A>C (p.Asn101Thr) and not detected in our study, showed an association with body weight in this breed [16]. The effect of the MC4R polymorphism (c.637G>T, c.777T>C, 868C>T and c.*33C>G) on morphometric traits (weight, length and height) of Golden Retrievers (n = 187) was studied by van den Berg et al. [15], who reported no such effect. The above-mentioned reports indicate that the importance of the MC4R polymorphism in relation to dogs’ obesity is not clear. Finally, there are no studies showing an association of this gene with body weight or obesity in the Labrador Retriever breed. Interestingly, in this breed such associations were described for two genes: TNF [23] and POMC [14, 24].

Evaluation of the MC4R gene methylation in peripheral blood cells may be considered a controversial task, since its expression is relatively low when compared to the brain. However, the use of a tissue, which is not a major site of expression of a given gene (e.g. TNF, POMC and NPY) for diagnostic purposes may be efficient [28, 29]. It was also shown that methylation of the human MC4R, analyzed in cord blood cells, was associated with triglyceride level in preterm and term infants [30]. Thus, analysis of the MC4R methylation in blood cells is justified. Another issue concerns the importance of methylation within a gene body, which has received more attention since it was shown that the methylation level within the gene is much higher than in 5′- and 3′-flanking regions [31]. Moreover, such hypermethylation may positively correlate with transcription level, in contrast to repression of the expression due to promoter methylation. However, some studies have shown a negative correlation between intragenic methylation and transcriptional elongation [32] and splicing [33]. Moreover, there are also observations that DNA methylation interacts with histone modifications and intragenic methylation contributes to proper transcript elongation by removing repressive epigenetic marks (H3K27me3) and recruiting H3K36me3 marks, which are accumulated in actively transcribed units [32]. With regard to the MC4R gene it was shown that methylation of its coding region in mice is influenced by diet [19]. The authors analyzed brain tissue and showed that a high-fat diet caused a decrease in methylation of the CGIs near the transcription start site.

Our in silico analysis of the 1000 bp fragment upstream of the MC4R start codon showed no CGI, while in the coding sequence two CGIs were found. The level of individual cytosine methylation was high and did not differ between lean and obese dogs in the studied breeds. Thus, the methylation profile of the MC4R gene analyzed in blood cannot be considered as an epigenetic marker of adiposity.

We conclude that in contrast to the human it is rather unlikely that the MC4R gene is significantly associated with predisposition to obesity across all dog breeds. Also methylation of the MC4R gene body is not related with dog obesity.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The studies were financed by the National Science Centre in Poland, Project No. UMO-2013/09/B/NZ2/02208. We wish to thank Paulina Krzeminska for her technical support.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11033_2017_4114_MOESM1_ESM.doc (488 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 488 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Courcier EA, Thomson RM, Mellor DJ, Yam PS (2010) An epidemiological study of environmental factors associated with canine obesity. J Small Anim Pract 51:362–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lund EM, Armstrong PJ, Kirk CA, Klausner JS (2006) Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. Int J Appl Res Vet Med 4:177–186Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mao J, Xia Z, Chen J, Yu J (2013) Prevalence and risk factors for canine obesity surveyed in veterinary practices in Beijing, China. Prev Vet Med 112:438–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McGreevy PD, Thomson PC, Pride C, Fawcett A, Grassi T, Jones B (2005) Prevalence of obesity in dogs examined by Australian veterinary practices and the risk factors involved. Vet Rec 156:695–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Usui S, Yasuda H, Koketsu Y (2016) Characteristics of obese or overweight dogs visiting private Japanese veterinary clinics. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 6:338–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Such ZR, German AJ (2015) Best in show but not best shape: a photographic assessment of show dog body condition. Vet Rec 177:125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Switonski M (2014) Dog as a model in studies on human hereditary diseases and their gene therapy. Reprod Biol 14:44–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Switonski M, Mankowska M, Salamon S (2013) Family of melanocortin receptor (MCR) genes in mammals—mutations, polymorphisms and phenotypic effects. J Appl Genet 54:461–472CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loos RJ (2011) The genetic epidemiology of melanocortin 4 receptor variants. Eur J Pharmacol 660:156–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Locke AE, Kahali B, Berndt SI, Justice AE (2015) Genetic studies of body mass index yield new insights for obesity biology. Nature 518:197–206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xi B, Chandak GR, Shen Y, Wang Q, Zhou D (2012) Association between common polymorphism near the MC4R gene and obesity risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 7:e45731CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vega JA, Salazar G, Hodgson MI, Cataldo LR, Valladares M, Obregon AM, Santos JL (2016) Melanocortin-4 receptor Gene variation is associated with eating behavior in Chilean adults. Ann Nutr Metab 68:35–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee H, Ash GI, Angelopoulos TJ, Gordon PM, Moyna NM, Visich PS, Zoeller RF, Gordish-Dressman H, Deshpande V, Chen MH, Thompson PD, Hoffman EP, Devaney JM, Pescatello LS (2015) Obesity-related genetic variants and their associations with physical activity. Sports Med Open 1:34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raffan E, Dennis RJ, O’Donovan CJ, Becker JM, Scott RA, Smith SP, Withers DJ, Wood CJ, Conci E, Clements DN, Summers KM, German AJ, Mellersh CS, Arendt ML, Iyemere VP, Withers E, Söder J, Wernersson S, Andersson G, Lindblad-Toh K, Yeo GS, O’Rahilly S (2016) A deletion in the canine POMC gene is associated with weight and appetite in obesity-prone labrador retriever dogs. Cell Metab 23:893–900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van den Berg L, van den Berg SM, Martens EE, Hazewinkel HA, Dijkshoorn NA, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, Heutink P, Leegwater PA, Heuven HC (2010) Analysis of variation in the melanocortin-4 receptor gene (mc4r) in Golden Retriever dogs. Anim Genet 41:557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zeng R, Zhang Y, Du P (2014) The SNPs of melanocortin 4 receptor (mc4r) associated with body weight in beagle dogs. Exp Anim 63:73–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Desiderio A, Spinelli R, Ciccarelli M, Nigro C, Miele C, Beguinot F, Raciti GA (2016) Epigenetics: spotlight on type 2 diabetes and obesity. J Endocrinol Invest 39:1095–1103CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drummond EM, Gibney ER (2013) Epigenetic regulation in obesity. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 16:392–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Widiker S, Karst S, Wagener A, Brockmann GA (2010) High-fat diet leads to a decreased methylation of the Mc4r gene in the obese BFMI and the lean B6 mouse lines. J Appl Genet 51:193–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21:263–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    SAS Institute Inc (2012) SAS enterprise guide version 5.1. Cary. NC.USAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liu N, Lucibello FC, Körner K, Wolfraim LA, Zwicker J, Müller R (1997) CDF-1, a novel E2F-unrelated factor, interacts with cell cycle-regulated repressor elements in multiple promoters. Nucleic Acids Res 25:4915–4920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mankowska M, Stachowiak M, Graczyk A, Ciazynska P, Gogulski M, Nizanski W, Switonski M (2016) Sequence analysis of three canine adipokine genes revealed an association between TNF polymorphisms and obesity in Labrador dogs. Anim Genet 47:245–249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miyabe M, Gin A, Onozawa E, Daimon M, Yamada H, Oda H, Mori A, Momota Y, Azakami D, Yamamoto I, Mochizuki M, Sako T, Tamura K, Ishioka K (2015) Genetic variants of the unsaturated fatty acid receptor GPR120 relating to obesity in dogs. J Vet Med Sci 77:1201–1206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Srinivasan S, Lubrano-Berthelier C, Govaerts C, Picard F, Santiago P, Conklin BR, Vaisse C (2004) Constitutive activity of the melanocortin-4 receptor is maintained by its N-terminal domain and plays a role in energy homeostasis in humans. J Clin Invest 114:1158–1164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yan J, Tao YX (2011) Pharmacological characterization of canine melancortin-4 receptor and its natural variant V213F. Domest Anim Endocrinol 41:91–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mankowska M, Krzeminska P, Graczyk M, Switonski M (2017) Confirmation that a deletion in the POMC gene is associated with body weight of Labrador Retriever dogs. Res Vet Sci 112:116–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Campion J, Milagro FI, Goyenechea E, Martinez JA (2009) TNF-alpha promoter methylation as a predictive biomarker for weight-loss response. Obesity 17:1293–1297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Crujeiras AB, Campion J, Diaz-Lagares A, Milagro FI, Goyenechea E, Abete I, Casanueva FF, Martinez JA (2013) Association of weight regain with specific methylation levels in the NPY and POMC promoters in leukocytes of obese men: a translational study. Regul Pept 186:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kwon EJ, Lee HA, You YA, Park H, Cho SJ, Ha EH, Kim YJ (2016) DNA methylations of MC4R and HNF4α are associated with increased triglyceride levels in cord blood of preterm infants. Medicine 95:e4590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yang Y, Zhou R, Mu Y, Hou X, Tang Z, Li K (2016) Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in obese, lean, and miniature pig breeds. Sci Rep 6:30160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee SM, Choi WY, Lee J, Kim YJ (2015) The regulatory mechanisms of intragenic DNA methylation. Epigenomics 7:527–531CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jones PA (2012) Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 13:484–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Monika Mankowska
    • 1
  • Joanna Nowacka-Woszuk
    • 1
  • Aneta Graczyk
    • 1
  • Paulina Ciazynska
    • 1
  • Monika Stachowiak
    • 1
  • Marek Switonski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Genetics and Animal BreedingPoznan University of Life SciencesPoznanPoland

Personalised recommendations