Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 3225–3234 | Cite as

Phylogeography and molecular diversity analysis of Jatropha curcas L. and the dispersal route revealed by RAPD, AFLP and nrDNA-ITS analysis

Article

Abstract

Jatropha curcas L. (Euphorbiaceae) has acquired a great importance as a renewable source of energy with a number of environmental benefits. Very few attempts were made to understand the extent of genetic diversity and its distribution. This study was aimed to study the diversity and deduce the phylogeography of Jatropha curcas L. which is said to be the most primitive species of the genus Jatropha. Here we studied the intraspecific genetic diversity of the species distributed in different parts of the globe. The study also focused to understand the molecular diversity at reported probable center of origin (Mexico), and to reveal the dispersal route to other regions based on random amplified polymorphic DNA, amplified fragment length polymorphism and nrDNA-ITS sequences data. The overall genetic diversity of J. curcas found in the present study was narrow. The highest genetic diversity was observed in the germplasm collected from Mexico and supports the earlier hypothesis based on morphological data and natural distribution, it is the center for origin of the species. Least genetic diversity found in the Indian germplasm and clustering results revealed that the species was introduced simultaneously by two distinct germplasm and subsequently distributed in different parts of India. The present molecular data further revealed that J. curcas might have spread from the center of the origin to Cape Verde, than to Spain, Portuguese to other neighboring countries and simultaneously to Africa. The molecular evidence supports the Burkill et al. (A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula, Governments of Malaysia and Singapore by the Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1966) view of Portuguese might have introduced the species to India. The clustering pattern suggests that the distribution was interfered by human activity.

Keywords

Genetic diversity Phylogeography Jatropha curcas L. AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) RAPD (random amplified polymorphic DNA) and nrDNA-ITS region 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. P. K. Ghosh, Director of the CSMCRI (CSIR, Bhavnagar, Gujarat), for allowing the access to the facilities of the institute, also wish to thank Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India for financial support. And also we are thankful to the Prof. K. Becker, Department of Aquaculture Systems and Animal Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany for providing Mexican and other exotic samples.

Supplementary material

11033_2014_3185_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (67 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 66 kb).

References

  1. 1.
    Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2005) Long-distance plant dispersal and habitat fragmentation: identifying conservation targets for spatial landscape planning under climate change. Biol Conserv 123:389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ouborg NJ, Piquot Y, Van Groenendael JM (1999) Population genetics, molecular markers and the study of dispersal in plants. J Ecol 87:551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dehgan B (1984) Phylogenetic Significance of Interspecific Hybridization in Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). Syst Bot 9:467–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sudheer Pamidimarri DVN, Chattopadhyay B, Reddy MP (2008) Genetic divergence and phylogenetic analysis of genus Jatropha based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequence. Mol Biol Rep 36:1929–1935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Francis G, Edinger R, Becker K (2005) A concept for simultaneous wasteland reclamation, fuel production, and socio-economic development in degraded areas in India: need, potential and perspectives of Jatropha plantations. Nat Resources Forum 29:12–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gübitz GM, Mittelbach M, Trabi M (1999) Exploitation of the tropical oil seed plant Jatropha curcas L. Bioresour Technol 67:73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mandpe S, Kadlaskar S, Degen W, Keppeler S (2005) On road testing of advanced common rail diesel vehicles with biodiesel from the jatropha curcas plant. society of automotive engineers. SAE Technical Paper 26:356–364Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sudheer Pamidiamarri DVN, Pandya N, Reddy MP, Radhakrishnan T (2008) Comparative study of interspecific genetic divergence and phylogenic analysis of genus Jatropha by RAPD and AFLP. Mol Biol Rep 36:901–907CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heller J, I.P.G.R. Institute, G. Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung Gatersleben (1996) Physic Nut, Jatropha Curcas L. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, RomeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Basha SD, Sujatha M (2007) Inter and intra-population variability of Jatropha curcas L. characterized by RAPD and ISSR markers and development of population-specific SCAR markers. Euphytica 156:375–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sudheer PDVN, Rahman H, Mastan SG, Reddy MP (2010) Isolation of novel microsatellites using FIASCO by dual probe enrichment from Jatropha curcas L. and study on genetic equilibrium and diversity of Indian population revealed by isolated microsatellites. Mol Biol Rep 37:3785–3793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mastan SG, Sudheer PDVN, Rahman H, Ghosh A, Rathore MS, Ravi Prakash C, Chikara J (2011) Molecular characterization of intra-population variability of Jatropha curcas L. using DNA based molecular markers. Mol Biol Rep 39:4383–4390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sudheer Pamidimarri DVN, Singh S, Mastan SG, Patel J, Reddy MP (2008) Molecular characterization and identification of markers for toxic and non-toxic varieties of Jatropha curcas L. using RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers. Mol Biol Rep 36:1357–1364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Lee Tvd, Hornes M, Friters A, Pot J, Paleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Williams JGK, Kubelik AR, Livak KJ, Rafalski JA, Tingey SV (1990) DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res 18:6531–6535PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Adams RP, Demeke T (1993) Systematic relationships in juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42:553–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Campos LP, Raelson JV, Grant WF (1994) Genome relationships among Lotus species based on random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Theor Appl Genet 88:417–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    CatalÁN P, Shi Y, Armstrong L, Draper J, Stace CA (1995) Molecular phylogeny of the grass genus Brachypodium P. Beauv. based on RFLP and RAPD analysis. Bot J Linn Soc 117:263–280Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Esselman EJ, Crawford DJ, Brauner S, Stuessy TF, Anderson GJ, Silva OM (2000) RAPD marker diversity within and divergence among species of dendroseris (Asteraceae: lactuceae). Am J Bot 87:591–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ranade SA, Kumar A, Goswami M, Farooqui N, Sane PV (1997) Genome analysis of amaranths: determination of inter- and intra-species variations. J Biosci 22:457–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morgan JAT, Blair D (1998) Relative merits of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers and mitochondrial CO1 and ND1 genes for distinguishing among Echinostoma species (Trematoda). Parasitology 116:289–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Navajas M, Lagnel J, Gutierrez J, Boursot P (1998) Species-wide homogeneity of nuclear ribosomal ITS2 sequences in the spider mite Tetranychus urticae contrasts with extensive mitochondrial COI polymorphism. Heredity 80:742–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ (1995) The its region of nuclear ribosomal dna: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Ann Mo Bot Gard 82:247–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Davies N, Bermingham E (2002) The historical biogeography of two caribbean butterflies (Lepidoptera: heliconiidae) as inferred from genetic variation at multiple loci. Evolution 56:573–589CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sudheer Pamidimarri DVN, Meenakshi RS, Boricha G, Reddy MP (2009) A simplified method for extraction of high quality genomic DNA from Jatropha curcas for genetic diversity and molecular marker studies. Indian J Biotechnol 8:187–192Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S (2007) MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:1596–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pamidimarri DVNS, Sinha R, Kothari P, Reddy MP (2009) Isolation of novel microsatellites from Jatropha curcas L. and their cross-species amplification. Mol Ecol Resour 9:431–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ram Jeet, Kumar A, Bhatt J (2004) Plant diversity in six forest types of Uttaranchal, Central Himalaya, India. Current science 86:975–978Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Colombo C, Second G, Charrier A (2000) Diversity within American cassava germ plasm based on RAPD markers. Genet Mol Biol 23:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jain NS, Sundaresan AK, Rajkumar V, Darokar S, Bagchi MP, Gupta GD, Kumar AK, Sushil Khanuja SPS (2003) Molecular diversity in Phyllanthus amarus assessed through RAPD analysis. Curr Sci 85:1454–1458Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thompson JA, Nelson RL (1998) Core set of primers to evaluate genetic diversity in Soybean. Crop Sci 38:1356–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Torres E, Iriondo JM, Pérez C (2003) Genetic structure of an endangered plant, Antirrhinum microphyllum (Scrophulariaceae): allozyme and RAPD analysis. Am J Bot 90:85–92CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wilbur RL (1954) A synopsis of Jatropha, subsection Eucurcas, with the description of two new species from Mexico. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 70:92–101Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wen M, Wang H, Xia Z, Zou M, Lu C, Wang W (2010) Development of EST-SSR and genomic-SSR markers to assess genetic diversity in Jatropha curcas L. BMC Res Notes 3:42PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Basha SD, Francis G, Makkar HPS, Becker K, Sujatha M (2009) A comparative study of biochemical traits and molecular markers for assessment of genetic relationships between Jatropha curcas L. germplasm from different countries. Plant Sci 176:812–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pamidimarri DVNS, Mastan SG, Rahman H, Reddy MP (2009) Molecular characterization and genetic diversity analysis of Jatropha curcas L. in India using RAPD and AFLP analysis. Mol Biol Rep 37:2249–2257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Burkill IH, Birtwistle W, Foxworthy FW, Scrivenor JB, Watson JG (1966) A dictionary of the economic products of the Malay Peninsula, Governments of Malaysia and Singapore by the Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives. Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Discipline of Wasteland ResearchCentral Salt and Marine Chemicals Research Institute (CSIR)BhavnagarIndia
  2. 2.Plant Stress Genomics and Technology CenterKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations