Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 3389–3394 | Cite as

The association between common genetic variant of microRNA-499 and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Article

Abstract

Published data on the association between microRNA-499 (miR-499) rs3746444 T>C polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of this relationship, a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed on nine published studies, with a total sample of 4,794 cases and 5,971 controls. Overall, no significant association was found between miR-499 polymorphism and cancer risk after all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant association with an increased risk was found in Asian (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.439, 95 % CI = 1.118–1.852, P = 0.005, p-heterogeneity = 0.116). Moreover, in the the subgroup analysis by cancer type, this SNP was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in the recessive model (OR = 1.077, 95 % CI = 1.008–1.151, P = 0.028, p-heterogeneity = 0.125). Our findings support the view that miR-499 rs3746444 T>C polymorphism is associated with breast cancer and the C allele can increase cancer susceptibility in Asian.

Keywords

MiR-499 rs3746444 Cancer Single nucleotide polymorphism Meta-analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM et al (2011) Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 61:69–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK et al (2000) Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer––analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 343:78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartels CL, Tsongalis GJ (2009) MicroRNAs: novel biomarkers for human cancer. Clin Chem 55:623–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bartel DP (2004) MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell 116:281–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartel DP (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136:215–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar MS, Lu J, Mercer KL et al (2007) Impaired microRNA processing enhances cellular transformation and tumorigenesis. Nat Genet 39:673–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saunders MA, Liang H, Li WH (2007) Human polymorphism at microRNAs and microRNA target sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:3300–3305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lafferty-Whyte K, Cairney CJ, Jamieson NB et al (2009) Pathway analysis of senescence-associated miRNA targets reveals common processes to different senescence induction mechanisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1792:341–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang JX, Jiao JQ, Li Q et al (2011) miR-499 regulates mitochondrial dynamics by targeting calcineurin and dynamin-related protein-1. Nat Med 17:71–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hu Z, Chen J, Tian T et al (2008) Genetic variants of miRNA sequences and non-small cell lung cancer survival. J Clin Invest 118:2600–2608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu Z, Liang J, Wang Z et al (2009) Common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs were associated with increased risk of breast cancer in Chinese women. Hum Mutat 30:79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Catucci I, Yang R, Verderio P et al (2010) Evaluation of SNPs in miR-146a, miR196a2 and miR-499 as low-penetrance alleles in German and Italian familial breast cancer cases. Hum Mutat 31:E1052–E1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu Z, Li G, Wei S et al (2010) Genetic variants in selected pre-microRNA genes and the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 116:4753–4760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okubo M, Tahara T, Shibata T et al (2010) Association between common genetic variants in pre-microRNAs and gastric cancer risk in Japanese population. Helicobacter 15:524–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Akkiz H, Bayram S, Bekar A et al (2011) Genetic variation in the microRNA-499 gene and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in a Turkish population: lack of any association in a case-control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 12:3107–3112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mittal RD, Gangwar R, George GP et al (2011) Investigative role of pre-microRNAs in bladder cancer patients: a case-control study in North India. DNA Cell Biol 30:401–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vinci S, Gelmini S, Pratesi N et al (2011) Genetic variants in miR-146a, miR-149, miR-196a2, miR-499 and their influence on relative expression in lung cancers. Clin Chem Lab Med 49:2073–2080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou B, Wang K, Wang Y et al (2011) Common genetic polymorphisms in pre-microRNAs and risk of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Carcinog 50:499–505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alshatwi AA, Shafi G, Hasan TN et al (2012) Differential expression profile and genetic variants of microRNAs sequences in breast cancer patients. PLoS ONE 7:e30049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xiang Y, Fan S, Cao J et al (2012) Association of the microRNA-499 variants with susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma in a Chinese population. Mol Biol Rep 39:7019–7023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou J, Lv R, Song X et al (2012) Association between two genetic variants in miRNA and primary liver cancer risk in the Chinese population. DNA Cell Biol 31:524–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim WH, Min KT, Jeon YJ et al (2012) Association study of microRNA polymorphisms with hepatocellular carcinoma in Korean population. Gene 504:92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wu R, Li B (1999) A multiplicative-epistatic model for analyzing interspecific differences in outcrossing species. Biometrics 55:355–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 22:719–748PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Munafo M (2004) Replication validity of genetic association studies of smoking behavior: what can meta-analytic techniques offer? Nicotine Tob Res 6:381–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations