Molecular classification and phylogenetic relationships of selected edible Basidiomycetes species
Morphological identification of edible mushrooms can sometimes prove troublesome, because phenotypic variation in fungi can be affected by substrate and environmental factors. One of the most important problems for mushroom breeders is the lack of a systematic consensus tool to distinguish different species, which are sometimes morphologically identical. Basidiomycetes as one of the largest groups of edible mushrooms have become more important in recent times for their medicinal and nutritional properties. Partial rDNA sequences, including the Internal Transcribed Spacer I-5.8SrDNA-Internal Transcribed Spacer II, were used in this study for molecular identification and assessment of phylogenetic relationships between selected edible species of the Basidiomycetes. Phylogenetic trees showed five distinct clades; each clade belonging to a separate family group. The first clade included all the species belonging to the Pleurotaceae (Pleurotus spp.) family; similarly, the second, third, fourth, and fifth clades consist of species from the Agaricaceae (Agaricus sp.), Lyophllaceae (Hypsigygus sp.), Marasmiaceae (Lentinula edodes sp.) and Physalacriaceae (Flammulina velutipes sp.) families, respectively. Moreover, different species of each family were clearly placed in a distinct sub-cluster and a total of 13 species were taken for analysis. Species differentiation was re-confirmed by AMOVA analysis (among the populations: 99.67%; within: 0.33%), nucleotide divergence, haplotyping and P value. Polymorphism occurred throughout the ITS regions due to insertion–deletion and point mutations, and can be clearly differentiated within the families as well as genera. Moreover, this study proves that the sequence of the ITS region is a superior molecular DNA barcode for taxonomic identification of Basidiomycetes.
KeywordsBasidiomycetes ITS region rDNA AMOVA Haplotype group DNA barcode
This study was supported by a research Grant (PS291-2009C) and 66-02-03-0074 from the Institute of Research Management and Monitoring (IPPP), University of Malaya. We are grateful to Dr. Anke from the Unit for the Enhancement of Academic Performance (ULPA), University of Malaya and Dr. Jesu Arockiaraj for editing. We would also like to thank the mushroom farmers for their cooperation and help.
- 1.Vikineswary S, Abdullah N, Ibrahim N, How TY, Daud F, Jones EBG (2007) Edible and medical mushroom. In: Jones EBG, Hyde KD, Vikineswary S (eds) Malaysia fungal diversity. University of Malaya and Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Malaysia, pp 287–301Google Scholar
- 6.White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR protocols a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322Google Scholar
- 8.Stajic M, Sikorski J, Wasser SP, Nevo E (2005) Genetic similarity and taxonomic relationships within the genus Pleurotus (higher Basidiomycetes) determined by RAPD analysis. Mycotaxon 93:247–256Google Scholar
- 13.Chang YS, Lee SS (2004) Utilization of Macrofungi species in Malaysia. Fungal Divers 15:15–22Google Scholar
- 14.Weiland JJ (1997) Rapid procedure for the extraction of DNA from fungal spores and mycelia. Fungal Genet Newslett 44:60–63Google Scholar
- 20.Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol bioinform online 1:47–50Google Scholar
- 24.Fries E (1989) 1836–1838. Epicrisis systematis mycologici, synopsis hymenomycetum. Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
- 26.Pegler D, Yi-Jian YA (1995) The distinction between Lentinus sajor-caju and Pleurotus ostreatus and their taxonomy. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 17(3):305–311Google Scholar
- 27.Li X, Yao Y (2005) Revision of the taxonomic position of the Phoenix Mushroom. Mycotaxon 91:61–74Google Scholar
- 29.Guzmán G, Montoya L, Mata G, Salmones D (1994) Studies in the genus Pleurotus. III: The varieties of P. ostreatus-complex based in interbreeding strains and in the study of basidiomata obtained in culture. Mycotaxon 50:365–378Google Scholar