Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 5307–5313 | Cite as

Genetic diversity in some grape varieties revealed by SCoT analyses

  • Da-Long Guo
  • Jun-Yu Zhang
  • Chong-Huai Liu


Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphic markers were used to assess genetic relationships among 64 grape varieties. Seventeen informative primers were selected from 36 SCoT primers based on their ability to produce clear and repeatable polymorphic and unambiguous bands among the varieties. A total of 131 bands were produced; 93.1% of them were polymorphic; the average polymorphism information content was 0.82. Cluster analysis of SCoT markers through the unweighted pair-group method of arithmetic averages analysis and principal coordinate analysis were largely consistent. The partition of clusters in the dendrogram and PCoA plot was similar and some degree of grouping by types of grape and taxonomic status of the varieties was revealed. Four main groups were found after cluster analysis, i.e. table grape of Vitis vinifera; table grape of Euro-America hybrid; wine grape of V. vinifera and wild Vitis species. The results showed that the wild Vitis species originated from America and China could be clearly differentiated. The results also indicated that SCoT markers are informative and could be used to detect polymorphism for grape varieties.


Genetic diversity SCoT Grape Vitis 



This study was financially supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC: 30800742), Young Teacher Funding Program of Henan Higher School (2010GGJS-072) and National Technology System for Grape Industry of China (nycytx-30-zy-01).

Supplementary material

11033_2011_1329_MOESM1_ESM.doc (114 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 110 kb)


  1. 1.
    This P, Lacombe T, Thomas M (2006) Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends Genet 22(9):511–519PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wan YZ, Schwaninger H, Li D, Simon CJ, Wang YJ, He PC (2008) The eco-geographic distribution of wild grape germplasm in China. Vitis 47(2):77–80Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kong QS (ed) (2004) Flora of Chinese grapes. China agriculture and technology press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liu CH, Kong QS, Pan X (2002) Germplasm background of the grape varieties bred in China and its innovation. J Fruit Sci 19(4):256–261Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hu JB, Li JW, Li Q, Ma SW, Wang JM (2011) The use of chloroplast microsatellite markers for assessing cytoplasmic variation in a watermelon germplasm collection. Mol Biol Rep. doi: 10.1007/s11033-010-0643-8
  6. 6.
    Xue H, Xiao Y, Jin Y, Li X, Fang Y, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Guan J (2011) Genetic diversity and geographic differentiation analysis of duckweed using inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Mol Biol Rep. doi: 10.1007/s11033-011-0769-3
  7. 7.
    Teh SL, Chan WS, Abdullah JO, Namasivayam P (2010) Development of expressed sequence tag resources for Vanda Mimi Palmer and data mining for EST-SSR. Mol Biol Rep 38(6):3903–3909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sudheer Pamidimarri DVN, Singh S, Mastan SG, Patel J, Reddy MP (2009) Molecular characterization and identification of markers for toxic and non-toxic varieties of Jatropha curcas L using RAPD, AFLP and SSR markers. Mol Biol Rep 36(6):1357–1364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cunha J, Teixeira Santos M, Carneiro LC, Fevereiro P, Eiras-Dias JE (2009) Portuguese traditional grapevine cultivars and wild vines (Vitis vinifera L.) share morphological and genetic traits. Genet Resour Crop Evol 56(7):975–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shiraishi M, Fujishima H, Chijiwa H (2010) Evaluation of table grape genetic resources for sugar, organic acid, and amino acid composition of berries. Euphytica 174(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sabir A, Tangolar S, Buyukalaca S, Kafkas S (2009) Ampelographic and molecular diversity among grapevine (Vitis spp.) cultivars. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 45(4):160–168Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trondle D, Schroder S, Kassemeyer HH, Kiefer C, Koch MA, Nick P (2010) Molecular phylogeny of the genus Vitis (Vitaceae) based on plastid markers. Am J Bot 97(7):1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karataş H, Ağaoğlu YS (2008) Genetic diversity among Turkish local grape accessions (Vitis vinifera L.) using RAPD markers. Hereditas 145(2):58–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Argade N, Tamhankar S, Karibasappa G, Patil S, Rao V (2009) DNA profiling and assessment of genetic relationships among important seedless grape (Vitis vinifera) varieties in India using ISSR markers. J Plant Biochem Biotechnol 18(1):45–51Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laucou V, Lacombe T, Dechesne F, Siret R, Bruno JP, Dessup M, Dessup T, Ortigosa P, Parra P, Roux C, Santoni S, Varès D, Péros JP, Boursiquot JM, This P (2011) High throughput analysis of grape genetic diversity as a tool for germplasm collection management. Theor Appl Genet 122(6):1233–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Myles S, Boyko AR, Owens CL, Brown PJ, Grassi F, Aradhya MK, Prins B, Reynolds A, Chia JM, Ware D (2011) Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(9):3530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Myles S, Chia J, Hurwitz B, Simon C, Zhong G, Buckler E, Ware D (2010) Rapid genomic characterization of the genus vitis. PLoS ONE 5(1):e8219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    D’Onofrio C, Lorenzis G, Giordani T, Natali L, Cavallini A, Scalabrelli G (2010) Retrotransposon-based molecular markers for grapevine species and cultivars identification. Tree Genet Genom 6(3):451–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Semagn K, Bjornstad A, Ndjiondjop M (2006) An overview of molecular marker methods for plants. Afr J Biotechnol 5(25):2540–2568Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andersen JR, Lübberstedt T (2003) Functional markers in plants. Trends Plant Sci 8(11):554–560PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Collard BCY, Mackill DJ (2009) Start codon targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel DNA marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants. Plant Mol Biol Rep 27(1):86–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xiong F, Zhong R, Han Z, Jiang J, He L, Zhuang W, Tang R (2011) Start codon targeted polymorphism for evaluation of functional genetic variation and relationships in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties. Mol Biol Rep 38(5):3487–3494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gorji AM, Poczai P, Polgar Z, Taller J (2011) Efficiency of arbitrarily amplified dominant markers (SCoT, ISSR and RAPD) for diagnostic fingerprinting in tetraploid potato. Am J Potato Res 88:226–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Doyle JJ (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW (1980) Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32(3):314–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121
  27. 27.
    Rohlf F (2000) NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system version 2.2. Exeter Software Setauket, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramezani A, Haddad R, Dorostkar M, Mardi M, Naghavi M (2009) Evaluation of genetic diversity of Iranian grapevine accessions using microsatellite markers. Vitis 48(3):151–152Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH, Boursiquot J-M, Walker MA, Meredith CP, Simon CJ (2003) Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. Genet Res 81(3):179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heuertz M, Goryslavets S, Hausman JF, Risovanna V (2008) Characterization of grapevine accessions from Ukraine using microsatellite markers. Am J Enol Viticult 59(2):169Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Péros JP, Berger G, Portemont A, Boursiquot JM, Lacombe T (2011) Genetic variation and biogeography of the disjunct Vitis subg. Vitis (Vitaceae). J Biogeogr 38(3):471–486 32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arroyo-Garcia R, Lefort F, de Andres MT, Ibanez J, Borrego J, Jouve N, Cabello F, Martinez-Zapater JM (2002) Chloroplast microsatellite polymorphisms in Vitis species. Genome 45(6):1142–1149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of ForestryHenan University of Science and TechnologyLuoyangPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Zhengzhou Fruit Research InstituteChinese Academy of Agricultural SciencesZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations