Molecular Biology Reports

, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp 721–729 | Cite as

Comparative temporal analyses of the Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica litv. apical bud proteome from dormancy to growth



Bud dormancy in perennial plants adapts to environmental and seasonal changes. Bud dormancy is of ecological interest because it affects forest population growth characteristics and is of economical interest because it impacts wood production levels. To understand Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica litv. bud-dormancy and bud-burst mechanisms, we characterized the proteomes of their apical buds at the four critical stages that occur during the dormancy-to-growth transition. Ninety-six proteins with altered expression patterns were identified using NanoLC–ESI-MS/MS. The majority of these proteins (57%) are involved in metabolic and other cellular processes. For 28% of the proteins, a function could not be assigned. However, because their expression levels changed, they may be potential candidate bud development- or dormancy-related proteins. Of the 75 non-redundant bud proteins identified, ascorbate peroxidase, pathogenesis-related protein PR-10, and heat shock proteins dramatically increased during August and November, suggesting that they may involved in the initiation of bud dormancy. Conversely, S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, abscisic acid/stress-induced proteins, superoxide dismutase (SOD), caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase, actin, and type IIIa membrane protein cp-wap13 had greater expression levels during April, suggesting that they may be involved in the initiation of bud dormancy-release. Cell division cycle protein 48 and eukaryotic initiation factors 4A-15 and 4A had greater expression levels during May, suggesting that they may regulate cell proliferate and differentiation in the shoot apical meristem. These observations provide insights into the molecular mechanisms that induce or break bud dormancy.


Pinus sylvestris L. Proteomics Bud dormancy 



We are grateful for financial support from the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (Grant 30972330); Key project of Science and technology of Ministry of Education of the people’s republic of China (Grant 108048) and Natural sciences Foundation of Heilongjiang province (Grant C200930).

Supplementary material

11033_2010_159_MOESM1_ESM.doc (268 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 268 kb)


  1. 1.
    Romberger JA (1963) Meristems, growth and development in woody plants: an analytical review of anatomical, physiological, and morphogenic aspects. US Dept Agric For Serv, Tech Bull 1239:1–214Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Viémont J, Crabbé J (2000) Growth cycle and dormancy in plants. CABI, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arora R, Rowland LJ, Tanino K (2003) Induction and release of bud dormancy in woody perennials: a science comes of age. HortScience 38:911–921Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Frewen BE, Chen THH, Howe GT, Davis J, Rohde A, Boerjan W, Bradshaw HD (2000) Quantitative trait loci and candidate gene mapping of bud set and bud flush in Populus. Genetics 154:837–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eriksson G, Ekberg I, Dormling I, Matérn B, Wettstein D (1978) Inheritance of bud-set and bud-flushing in Picea abies (L.) Karst. Theor Appl Genet 52:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen THH, Howe GT, Bradshaw HD Jr (2002) Molecular genetic analysis of dormancy-related traits in poplars. Weed Sci 50:232–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Howe GT, Saruul P, Davis J, Chen THH (2000) Quantitative genetics of bud phenology, frost damage, and winter survival in an F 2 family of hybrid poplars. Theor Appl Genet 101:632–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradshaw HD Jr, Stettler RF (1995) Molecular genetics of growth and development in Populus. IV. Mapping QTLs with large effects on growth, form, and phenology traits in a forest tree. Genetics 139:963–973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sylven N (1940) Longday and shortday types of Swedish forest trees. Medd Fören Växtförädling Skogsträd (English summary) Sv Papp Tidn 43:351–354Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nitsch JP (1957) Photoperiodism in woody plants. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 70:526–544Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiser CJ (1970) Cold resistance and injury in woody plants: knowledge of hardy plant adaptations to freezing stress may help us to reduce winter damage. Science 169:1269–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kermode AR (2005) Role of abscisic acid in seed dormancy. J Plant Growth Regul 24:319–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rakwal R, Komatsu S (2005) Abscisic acid promoted changes in the protein profiles of rice seedling by proteome analysis. Mol Biol Rep 31:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karami O, Saidi A (2009) The molecular basis for stress-induced acquisition of somatic embryogenesis. Molecular Biology Reports doi: 10.1007/s11033-11009-19764-11033
  15. 15.
    Senthil K, Wasnik NG, Kim YJ, Yang DC (2010) Generation and analysis of expressed sequence tags from leaf and root of Withania somnifera (Ashwgandha). Mol Biol Rep 37:893–902CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bohlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, Strauss SH,Nilsson O (2006) CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312:1040–1043Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rohde A, Prinsen E, De Rycke R, Engler G, Van Montagu M, Boerjan W (2002) PtABI3 impinges on the growth and differentiation of embryonic leaves during bud set in poplar. Plant Cell 14:1885–1901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ruonala R, Rinne PLH, Baghour M, Moritz T, Tuominen H, Kangasjarvi J (2006) Transitions in the functioning of the shoot apical meristem in birch (Betula pendula) involve ethylene. Plant J 46:628–640CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Razem FA, El-Kereamy A, Abrams SR, Hill RD (2006) The RNA-binding protein FCA is an abscisic acid receptor. Nature 439:290–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simpson GG (2004) The autonomous pathway: epigenetic and post-transcriptional gene regulation in the control of Arabidopsis flowering time. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:570–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Horvath DP, Anderson JV, Chao WS, Foley ME (2003) Knowing when to grow: signals regulating bud dormancy. Trends Plant Sci 8:534–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eshed Y, Baum SF, Bowman JL (1999) Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell 99:199–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Katz A, Oliva M, Mosquna A, Hakim O, Ohad N (2004) FIE and CURLY LEAF polycomb proteins interact in the regulation of homeobox gene expression during sporophyte development. Plant J 37:707–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torres Acosta JA, de Almeida Engler J, Raes J, Magyar Z, De Groodt R, Inze D, De Veylder L (2004) Molecular characterization of Arabidopsis PHO80-like proteins, a novel class of CDKA; 1-interacting cyclins. Cell Mol Life Sci 61:1485–1497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu Z, Yang X, Fu Y, Zhang Y, Yan J, Song T, Rocheford T, Li J (2009) Proteomic analysis of early germs with high-oil and normal inbred lines in maize. Mol Biol Rep 36:813–821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhu H, Bi YD, Yu LJ, Guo DD, Wang BC (2009) Comparative proteomic analysis of apomictic monosomic addition line of Beta corolliflora and Beta vulgaris L. in sugar beet. Mol Biol Rep 36:2093–2098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Feng JR, Chen XS, Yuan ZH, Zhang LJ, Ci ZJ, Liu XL, Zhang CY (2009) Primary molecular features of self-incompatible and self-compatible F1 seedling from apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Katy× Xinshiji. Mol Biol Rep 36:263–272CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D (2002) Proteomics of Arabidopsis seed germination. A comparative study of wild-type and gibberellin-deficient seeds. Plant Physiol 129:823–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chibani K, Ali-Rachedi S, Job C, Job D, Jullien M, Grappin P (2006) Proteomic analysis of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 142:1493–1510CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Finch-Savage WE, Leubner-Metzger G (2006) Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol 171:501–523CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lee CS, Chien CT, Lin CH, Chiu YY, Yang YS (2006) Protein changes between dormant and dormancy-broken seeds of Prunus campanulata Maxim. Proteomics 6:4147–4154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jun Z, Zhang KH, Hui TAN, Ling XUM, Jun W (2005) Natural regeneration characteristics of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica forests on sandy land in Honghuaerji, China. J For Res 16:253–259Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang BC, Pan YH, Meng DZ, Zhu YX (2006) Identification and quantitative analysis of significantly accumulated proteins during the Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation process. J Integr Plant Biol 48:104–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M (1996) Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 68:850–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Samish RM (1954) Dormancy in woody plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 5:183–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kainer KA, Duryea ML, White TL, Johnson JD (1991) Slash pine bud dormancy as affected by lifting date and root wrenching in the nursery. Tree Physiol 9:479–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rison SCG, Hodgman TC, Thornton JM (2000) Comparison of functional annotation schemes for genomes. Funct Integr Genomics 1:56–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lange BM, Ghassemian M (2005) Comprehensive post-genomic data analysis approaches integrating biochemical pathway maps. Phytochemistry 66:413–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ruttink T, Arend M, Morreel K, Storme V, Rombauts S, Fromm J, Bhalerao RP, Boerjan W, Rohde A (2007) A molecular timetable for apical bud formation and dormancy induction in poplar. Plant Cell 19:2370–2390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Peyret P, Perez P, Alric M (1995) Structure, genomic organization, and expression of the Arabidopsis thaliana aconitase gene. J Biol Chem 270:8131–8137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Comai L, Dietrich RA, Maslyar DJ, Baden CS, Harada JJ (1989) Coordinate expression of transcriptionally regulated isocitrate lyase and malate synthase genes in Brassica napus L. Plant Cell Online 1:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Turley RB, Trelease RN (1990) Development and regulation of three glyoxysomal enzymes during cotton seed maturation and growth. Plant Mol Biol 14:137–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D (2001) Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination and priming. Plant Physiol 126:835–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cheng L, Fuchigami LH (2002) Growth of young apple trees in relation to reserve nitrogen and carbohydrates. Tree Physiol 22:1297–1303PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bryan JK, Miflin BJ, Lea PJ (1991) The biochemistry of plants. A comprehensive treatise. Amino acids and derivatives. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hesse H, Kreft O, Maimann S, Zeh M, Hoefgen R (2004) Current understanding of the regulation of methionine biosynthesis in plants. J Exp Bot 55:1799–1808CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Szegő D, Kósa E, Horváth E (2007) Role of S-methylmethionine in the plant metabolism. Acta Agron Hung 55:491–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mijnsbrugge KV, Meyermans H, Van Montagu M, Bauw G, Boerjan W (2000) Wood formation in poplar: identification, characterization, and seasonal variation of xylem proteins. Planta 210:589–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vincent D, Lapierre C, Pollet B, Cornic G, Negroni L, Zivy M (2005) Water deficits affect caffeate O-methyltransferase, lignification, and related enzymes in maize leaves. A proteomic investigation 1 [w]. Plant Physiol 137:949–960CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Suarez MF, Avila C, Gallardo F, Canton FR, Garcia-Gutierrez A, Claros MG,Canovas FM (2002) Molecular and enzymatic analysis of ammonium assimilation in woody plants. Soc Experiment Biol 53:891–904Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cánovas FM, Avila C, Cantón FR, Cañas RA, Fdl Torre (2007) Ammonium assimilation and amino acid metabolism in conifers. J Exp Bot 58:2307–2318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Canton FR, Suarez MF, Canovas FM (2005) Molecular aspects of nitrogen mobilization and recycling in trees. Photosynth Res 83:265–278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wareing PF, Saunders PF (1971) Hormones and dormancy. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 22:261–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    De Smet I, Zhang H, Inz D, Beeckman T (2006) A novel role for abscisic acid emerges from underground. Trends Plant Sci 11:434–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tanino KK (2004) Hormones and endodormancy induction in woody plants. J Crop Improv 10:157–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rohde A, Bhalerao RP (2007) Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends Plant Sci 12:217–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pukacka S, Ratajczak E (2005) Production and scavenging of reactive oxygen species in Fagus sylvatica seeds during storage at varied temperature and humidity. J Plant Physiol 162:873–885CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Oracz K, Bouteau HEM, Farrant JM, Cooper K, Belghazi M, Job C, Job D, Corbineau F, Bailly C (2007) ROS production and protein oxidation as a novel mechanism for seed dormancy alleviation. Plant J 50:452–465CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pastori GM, Foyer CH (2002) Common components, networks, and pathways of cross-tolerance to stress. The central role of “redox” and abscisic acid-mediated controls. Am Soc Plant Biol 129:460–468Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Foyer CH, Noctor G (2003) Redox sensing and signalling associated with reactive oxygen in chloroplasts, peroxisomes and mitochondria. Physiol Plant 119:355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kocsy G, Galiba G, Brunold C (2001) Role of glutathione in adaptation and signalling during chilling and cold acclimation in plants. Physiol Plant 113:158–164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wang SY, Jiao HJ, Faust M (1991) Changes in ascorbate, glutathione, and related enzyme activities during thidiazuron-induced bud break of apple. Physiol Plant 82:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang SY, Faust M (1994) Changes in the antioxidant system associated with budbreak in ‘Anna’ apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) buds. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:735–741Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Pérez FJ, Lira W (2005) Possible role of catalase in post-dormancy bud break in grapevines. J Plant Physiol 162:301–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wang W, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2004) Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends Plant Sci 9:244–252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hon WC, Griffith M, Mlynarz A, Kwok YC, Yang DSC (1995) Antifreeze proteins in winter rye are similar to pathogenesis-related proteins. Am Soc Plant Biol 109:879–889Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Gaudet DA, Laroche A, Frick M, Davoren J, Puchalski B, Ergon (2000) Expression of plant defence-related (PR-protein) transcripts during hardening and dehardening of winter wheat. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 57:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Yu X, Ekramoddoullah AKM, Misra S (2000) Characterization of Pin m III cDNA in western white pine. Tree Physiol 20:663–671PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Liu JJ, Ekramoddoullah AKM, Yu X (2003) Differential expression of multiple PR10 proteins in western white pine following wounding, fungal infection and cold-hardening. Physiol Plant 119:544–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Feiler HS, Desprez T, Santoni V, Kronenberger J, Caboche M, Traas J (1995) The higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a functional CDC48 homologue which is highly expressed in dividing and expanding cells. EMBO J 14:5626PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rancour DM, Dickey CE, Park S, Bednarek SY (2002) Characterization of AtCDC48. Evidence for multiple membrane fusion mechanisms at the plane of cell division in plants. Plant Physiol 130:1241–1253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Shoresh M, Harman GE (2008) The molecular basis of shoot responses of maize seedlings to Trichoderma harzianum T22 inoculation of the root: a proteomic approach. Plant Physiol 147:2147–2163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chen T, Wu X, Chen Y, Li X, Huang M, Zheng M, Baluska F, Samaj J, Lin J (2009) Combined proteomic and cytological analysis of Ca2+-calmodulin regulation in Picea meyeri pollen tube growth. Plant Physiol 149:1111–1126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ying-Dong Bi
    • 1
  • Zhi-Gang Wei
    • 1
  • Zhuo Shen
    • 1
  • Tian-Cong Lu
    • 1
  • Yu-Xiang Cheng
    • 1
  • Bai-Chen Wang
    • 1
  • Chuan-Ping Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Forest Tree Genetic Improvement and Biotechnology, Ministry of EducationNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations