Association of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 gene haplotype with the susceptibility to gastric cancer
- 208 Downloads
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) was widely accepted as a pivotal molecule in downregulating T-cell mediated immune responses. In this study we investigated the polymorphisms which would impact the CTLA-4 gene expression and function to assess the association with the risk of gastric cancer. 205 gastric cancer patients and 262 healthy controls were included in the case-control study. PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods were performed to identify the +49A/G and promoter −1661A/G polymorphisms. The promoter −1772T/C polymorphism was detected by PCR amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS) technique. A significant difference was observed between case and control groups. The frequency of +49A/G polymorphism AG and −1661A/G polymorphism GG genotype were significantly higher in patients than in controls (OR = 2.15, OR = 1.88, respectively). No significant difference was found in the allelic frequency of −1772T/C polymorphism between cases and controls (P = 0.478). By the haplotype analysis, logistic regression showed the frequency of haplotype A (GAT) and D (AGT) in the case group revealed significant difference compared with in control group(OR = 2.00, P < 0.001; OR = 1.62, P = 0.043, respectively). Our findings implied the genetic variations within CTLA-4 gene would be a critical risk factor to the susceptibility of gastric cancer.
KeywordsCTLA-4 Gastric cancer Haplotype Susceptibility
Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4
Amplification refractory mutation system
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
- 20.Sutmuller RP, van Duivenvoorde LM, van Elsas A, Schumacher TN, Wildenberg ME, Allison JP, Toes RE, Offringa R, Melief CJ (2001) Synergism of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 blockade and depletion of CD25(+) regulatory T cells in antitumor therapy reveals alternative pathways for suppression of autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses. J Exp Med 194:823–832. doi: 10.1540-9538/2001.194-823 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar