The complete mitochondrial genome structure of snow leopard Panthera uncia
- 558 Downloads
The complete mitochondrial genome (mtDNA) of snow leopard Panthera uncia was obtained by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique based on the PCR fragments of 30 primers we designed. The entire mtDNA sequence was 16 773 base pairs (bp) in length, and the base composition was: A—5,357 bp (31.9%); C—4,444 bp (26.5%); G—2,428 bp (14.5%); T—4,544 bp (27.1%). The structural characteristics  of the P. uncia mitochondrial genome were highly similar to these of Felis catus, Acinonyx jubatus, Neofelis nebulosa and other mammals. However, we found several distinctive features of the mitochondrial genome of Panthera unica. First, the termination codon of COIII was TAA, which differed from those of F. catus, A. jubatus and N. nebulosa. Second, tRNASer (AGY), which lacked the ‘‘DHU’’ arm, could not be folded into the typical cloverleaf-shaped structure. Third, in the control region, a long repetitive sequence in RS-2 (32 bp) region was found with 2 repeats while one short repetitive segment (9 bp) was found with 15 repeats in the RS-3 region. We performed phylogenetic analysis based on a 3 816 bp concatenated sequence of 12S rRNA, 16S rRNA, ND2, ND4, ND5, Cyt b and ATP8 for P. uncia and other related species, the result indicated that P. uncia and P. leo were the sister species, which was different from the previous findings.
KeywordsPantherauncia Complete mitochondrial genome Phylogenetic analyses
This work was supported by grants from Knowledge Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. CXTDS2005–4), National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No.30470244), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (20070370002), the Fund for Leading Scientist of Science and Technology in Anhui and Key Laboratory of Biotic Environment and Ecological Safety in Anhui Province, China.
- 21.Rychlik W, Rychlik P (2000) Oligo Primer Analysis Software. Version6.01. Molecular Biology Insights, Inc., Cascade, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
- 24.Swofford DL (2003) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- 32.Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM (1993) Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst Biol 42:247–264Google Scholar
- 50.Casane D, Dennebouy N, de Rochambeau H, Mounolou JC, Monnerot M (1997) Nonneutral evolution of tandem repeats in the mitochondrial DNA control region of Lagomorphs. J Mol Biol Evol 14:779–789Google Scholar
- 52.Kurten B, Anderson E (1980) Pleistocene mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 108–118Google Scholar
- 53.Wayne RK, Benveniste RE, Janczewski DN, O'Brien SJ (1989) Molecular and biochemical evolution of the Carnivora. In: Gittleman JL (ed) Carnivore behaviour, ecology and evolution. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 465–494Google Scholar
- 56.Buckley-Beason VA, Johnson WE, Nash WG, Stanyon R, Menninger JC, Driscoll CA, Howard J, Bush M, Page JE, Roelke ME, Stone G, Martelli PP, Wen C, Ling L, Duraisingam RK, Lam PV, O’Brien SJ (2006) Molecular evidence for species-level distinctions in clouded leopards. Curr Biol 16(23):2371–2376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar