Molecular Breeding

, 37:68 | Cite as

Targeted and efficient transfer of value-added genes into a wheat variety

  • N. Kumar
  • Harpinder S. Randhawa
  • Ryan W. Higginbotham
  • Xianming Chen
  • Timothy D. Murray
  • Kulvinder S. Gill
Article
  • 241 Downloads

Abstract

With an objective to optimize an approach to transfer value-added genes to a wheat variety while maintaining and improving agronomic performance, two alleles (Als1 and Als2) with mutations in the acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene located on the long arm of wheat chromosomes 6B and 6D providing tolerance to imazamox herbicide were transferred to Eltan, a popular soft white common winter wheat cultivar in the Pacific Northwest (PNW), USA. Four-step marker-assisted background selection and marker assisted forward breeding approaches were used to develop a wheat variety carrying two genes (Als1 and Als2) for imazamox tolerance along with improvements in many other agronomic traits. Screening of 1600 BC1 plants for imazamox tolerance identified 378 plants that were further screened with markers to identify seven plants that were used to make a population of 1400 BC2 plants, and the selection cycle was repeated. Progeny of 17 selected BC2F1 plants was evaluated for various agronomic and quality parameters to select 12 plants that were increased for field testing. Field evaluation of these lines conducted over 58 location-years along with evaluation in the greenhouse/growth chamber led to the selection of a line “WA8143” carrying the two genes for imazamox tolerance that yielded >3% higher than Eltan did. With 96.8% similarity to the recurrent parent, WA8143 also showed a better disease resistance package and grain quality needed in a successful Pacific Northwest wheat variety and was subsequently released for cultivation under the name of “Curiosity CL+.”

Keywords

Triticum aestivum L. Marker-assisted background selection Two-gene imazamox tolerance Fast breeding Forward breeding 

Abbreviations

MABS

Marker-assisted background selection

SRC

Solvent retention capacity

SSR

Simple sequence repeat

SWW

Soft white winter

WECVTP

WSU extension cereal variety testing program

WSU

Washington State University

WWQL

Western Wheat Quality Laboratory

SKCS

Single kernel characterization system

RPG

Recurrent parent genome

Supplementary material

11032_2017_649_MOESM1_ESM.eps (196 kb)
Fig. S1Schematic representation of process for transferring two-gene (Als1 and Als2) for herbicide tolerance into ‘Eltan’ using marker-assisted forward breeding approach (EPS 196 kb)
11032_2017_649_Fig4_ESM.gif (10 kb)

High resolution image (GIF 9 kb)

11032_2017_649_MOESM2_ESM.eps (1.2 mb)
Fig. S2Phenotypic screening for herbicide tolerance under field conditions (a) Line carry two-gene mutant for ALS-tolerance and showing no damage, (b) Line carry single-gene mutant (Als1) and showing some damage, and (c) Wild type line or ‘susceptible’ that did not survive (EPS 1213 kb)
11032_2017_649_Fig5_ESM.gif (40 kb)

High resolution image (GIF 40 kb)

11032_2017_649_MOESM3_ESM.eps (137 kb)
Fig. S3Binary plot distribution of two quality parameters (% sucrose-SRC and wheat predicted flour yield) of micro-solvent retention capacity (micro-SRC) test estimated from backcross population for herbicide tolerance along with the recipient parent ‘Eltan’ (EPS 136 kb)
11032_2017_649_Fig6_ESM.gif (9 kb)

High resolution image (GIF 8 kb)

11032_2017_649_MOESM4_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 20 kb)
11032_2017_649_MOESM5_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 2(DOCX 22 kb)
11032_2017_649_MOESM6_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 3(DOCX 22 kb)
11032_2017_649_MOESM7_ESM.docx (24 kb)
ESM 4(DOCX 24 kb)
11032_2017_649_MOESM8_ESM.docx (21 kb)
ESM 5(DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Basavaraj SH, Singh VK, Singh A, Singh A, Singh A, Yadav S, Ellur RK, Singh D, Gopala Krishnan S, Nagarajan M, Mohapatra MT, Prabhu KV, Singh AK (2010) Marker-assisted improvement of bacterial blight resistance in parental lines of Pusa RH10, a superfine grain aromatic rice hybrid. Mol Breed 2:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BASF (2004) Beyond product label. BASF Corp, Research Triangle Park, NCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bettge AD, Morris CF, De Macon VL, Kidwell KK (2002) Adaptation of AACC method 56-11, solvent retention capacity, for use as an early generation selection tool for cultivar development. Cereal Chem 79:670–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter AH, Hansen J, Koehler T, Thill DC, Zemetra RS (2007) The effect of imazamox application timing and rate on imazamox resistant wheat cultivars in the Pacific northwest. Weed Tech 21:895–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen XM (2005) Epidemiology and control of stripe rust (Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici) on wheat. Can J Plant Pathol 17:314–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen XM, Line RF (1992) Inheritance of stripe rust resistance in wheat cultivars used to differentiate races of Puccinia striiformis in North America. Phytopathology 82:633–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen XM, Line RF (1995) Gene action in wheat cultivars for durable high-temperature adult-plant resistance and interactions with race-specific, seedling resistance to stripe rust caused by Puccinia striiformis. Phytopathology 85:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Erayman M, Sandhu D, Sidhu D, Dilbirligi M, Baenziger PS et al (2004) Demarcating the gene-rich regions of the wheat genome. Nucl Acids Res 32:3546–3565CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Harlan HV, Pope MN (1922) The use and value of back-crosses in small-grain breeding. J Hered 13:319–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu W, Xiao H, Hu K, Jiang Y, Zhang Y (2016) Application of marker-assisted backcross to introgress Bph3, Bph14 and Bph15 into an elite indica rice variety for improving its resistance to brown planthopper. Plant Breed. doi:10.1111/pbr.12364 Google Scholar
  11. Iftekharuddaula KM, Ahmad HU, Ghosal S, Moni ZR, Amin A, Ali MS (2015) Development of new submergence tolerant rice variety for Bangladesh using marker-assisted backcrossing. Rice Sci 22:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jeong H-S, Jang S, Han K, Kwon J-K, Kang B-C (2015) Marker-assisted backcross breeding for development of pepper varieties (Capsicum annuum) containing capsinoids. Mol Breed 35:226–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim C, Guo H, Kong W, Chandnani R, Shuang LS, Paterson AH (2015) Application of genotyping by sequencing technology to a variety of crop breeding programs. Plant Sci. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.04.016 Google Scholar
  14. Kronstad WE, Rohde CR, Kolding MF, Metzger RJ (1978) Registration of ‘Stephens’ wheat. Crop Sci 18:1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumar J, Mir RR, Kumar N, Kumar A, Mohan A, Prabhu KV, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2010) Marker-assisted selection for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance and leaf rust resistance in bread wheat. Plant Breed 129:617–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar J, Jaiswal V, Kumar A, Kumar N, Mir RR, Kumar S, Dhariwal R, Tyagi S, Khandelwal M, Prabhu KV, Prasad R, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2011) Introgression of a major gene for high grain protein content in some Indian bread wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res 123:226–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neeraja CN, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Pamplona A, Heuer S, Collard BCY, Septiningsih EM, Vergara G, Sanchez D, Xu K, Ismail AM, Mackill DJ (2007) A marker-assisted backcross approach for developing submergence-tolerant rice cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 115:767–776CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Perez-Jones A, Mallory-Smith AC, Hansen JL, Zemetra RS (2006) Introgression of an imidazolinone-resistance gene from winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) into jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica host). Theor Appl Genet 114:117–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peterson CJ, Allan RE, Rubenthaler GL, Line RF (1991) Registration of ‘Eltan’ wheat. Crop Sci 31:1704Google Scholar
  20. Randhawa HS, Mutti JS, Kidwell K, Morris CF, Chen X, Gill KS (2009) Rapid and targeted introgression of genes into popular wheat cultivars using marker-assisted background selection. PLoS One 4:E5752CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Röder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier MH, Leroy P, Ganal MW (1998) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149:2007–2023PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotech 18:233–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaner DL, Bascomb NF, Smith W (1996) Imidazolinone-resistant crops: selection, characterization, and management. In: Duke SO (ed) Herbicide resistant crops: agricultural, environmental, economic, regulatory, and technical aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 143–157Google Scholar
  24. Sundaram RM, Vishnupriya RM, Biradar SK, Laha GS, Ashok Reddy G, Shobha Rani N, Sarma NP, Sonti RV (2008) Marker assisted introgression of bacterial blight resistance in Samba Mahsuri, an elite indica rice variety. Euphytica 160:411–422Google Scholar
  25. Wetzel HC, Murray TD (2013) Reaction of winter wheat cultivars and breeding lines to Cephalosporium stripe, 2012. Plant Disease Manage Rep 7:CF021Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Kumar
    • 1
  • Harpinder S. Randhawa
    • 2
  • Ryan W. Higginbotham
    • 3
  • Xianming Chen
    • 4
  • Timothy D. Murray
    • 4
  • Kulvinder S. Gill
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  2. 2.Agriculture & Agri-Food CanadaLethbridge Research CentreLethbridgeCanada
  3. 3.WSU Extension, ANR Program UnitWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  4. 4.USDA-ARS, Wheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit and Department Plant PathologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations