Molecular Breeding

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 457–469 | Cite as

Increased bioethanol production from commercial tobacco cultivars overexpressing thioredoxin f grown under field conditions

  • Inmaculada Farran
  • Alicia Fernandez-San Millan
  • Maria Ancin
  • Luis Larraya
  • Jon Veramendi
Article

Abstract

Bioethanol is mainly produced from food crops such as sugar cane and maize, and this has been held partly responsible for the rise of food commodity prices. Tobacco, integrated in biorefinery facilities for the extraction of different compounds, could become an alternative feedstock for biofuel production. When grown for energy production, using high plant densities and several mowings during the growing season, tobacco can produce large amounts of inexpensive green biomass. We have bred two commercial tobacco cultivars (Virginia Gold and Havana 503B) to increase the carbohydrate content by the overexpression of thioredoxin f in the chloroplast. Marker-free transplastomic plants were recovered and their agronomic performance under field conditions was evaluated. These plants were phenotypically equivalent to their wild types yet showed increased starch (up to 280 %) and soluble sugar (up to 74 %) contents in leaves relative to their control plants. Fermentable sugars released from the stalk were also higher (up to 24 %) for transplastomic plants. After heat pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis and yeast fermentation of leaf and stalk hydrolysates, an average of 20–40 % more ethanol was obtained from transplastomic plants than their wild-type controls. We propose an integral exploitation of the entire tobacco plant managed as a forage crop (harvesting sugar and starch-rich leaves and lignocellulosic stalks) that could considerably cheapen the entire production process.

Keywords

Tobacco Chloroplast transformation Thioredoxin Bioethanol Field trial Carbohydrate 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Irantzu Alegría and co-workers of the Biomass Energy Department (Renewable Energy National Centre, Spain) for technical assistance with regard to biomass processing and for the critical reading of the manuscript; Lorea Villanueva for the collaboration undertaken with plant transformations; and Jaime Zabaleta (INTIA, Spain), Esther Molinero and Amaia Altuna for field experiment collaborations. This work was supported by Grant AGL2010-15107 from the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain).

Supplementary material

11032_2014_47_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (124 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 125 kb)
11032_2014_47_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (45 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 45 kb)
11032_2014_47_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (7 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (PDF 8 kb)
11032_2014_47_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (83 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (PDF 84 kb)
11032_2014_47_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (49 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (PDF 50 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal P, Verma D, Daniell H (2011) Expression of Trichoderma reesei β-mannanase in tobacco chloroplasts and its utilization in lignocellulosic woody biomass hydrolysis. PLoS ONE 6:e29302PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akpinar O, Erdogan K, Bakir U, Yilmaz L (2010) Comparison of acid and enzymatic hydrolysis of tobacco stalk xylan for preparation of xylooligosaccharides. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101:4851–4861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrianov V, Borisjuk N, Pogrebnyak N et al (2010) Tobacco as a production platform for biofuel: overexpression of Arabidopsis DGAT and LEC2 genes increases accumulation and shifts the composition of lipids in green biomass. Plant Biotechnol J 8:277–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brunecky R, Selig MJ, Vinzant TB et al (2011) In planta expression of A. cellulolyticus Cel5A endocellulase reduces cell wall recalcitrance in tobacco and maize. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:1PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Corneille S, Lutz K, Svab Z, Maliga P (2001) Efficient elimination of selectable marker genes from the plastid genome by the CRE-lox site-specific recombination system. Plant J 27:171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniell H (1997) Transformation and foreign gene expression in plants by microprojectile bombardment. Methods Mol Biol 62:463–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Du X, McPhail LL (2012) Inside the black box: the price linkage and transmission between energy and agricultural markets. Energy J 33:171–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erdei B, Barta Z, Sipos B et al (2010) Ethanol production from mixtures of wheat straw and wheat meal. Biotechnol Biofuels 3:16PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farran I, Río-Manterola F, Iñiguez M et al (2008) High-density seedling expression system for the production of bioactive human cardiotrophin-1, a potential therapeutic cytokine, in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Biotechnol J 6:516–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Food and Agricultural Organization (2003) Projections of tobacco production, consumption and trade to the year 2010. In: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/006/y4956e/y4956e00.pdf. Accessed 14 March 2013
  12. Food and Agricultural Organization (2011) Price volatility in food and agricultural markets: policy responsesGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaring MA, Skryhan K, Kötting O et al (2012) Comprehensive survey of redox sensitive starch metabolising enzymes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem 58:89–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray BN, Ahner BA, Hanson MR (2009) High-level bacterial cellulase accumulation in chloroplast-transformed tobacco mediated by downstream box fusions. Biotechnol Bioeng 102:1045–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gray BN, Yang H, Ahner BA, Hanson MR (2011) An efficient downstream box fusion allows high-level accumulation of active bacterial beta-glucosidase in tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Mol Biol 76:345–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund MF et al (2006) Bio-ethanol—the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today. Trends Biotechnol 24:549–556PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harris D, DeBolt S (2010) Synthesis, regulation and utilization of lignocellulosic biomass. Plant Biotechnol J 8:244–262PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hu G, Heitmann JA, Rojas OJ (2008) Feedstock pretreatment strategies for producing ethanol from wood, bark, and forest residues. BioResources 3:270–294Google Scholar
  19. Kolbe A, Oliver SN, Fernie AR et al (2006) Combined transcript and metabolite profiling of Arabidopsis leaves reveals fundamental effects of the thiol-disulfide status on plant metabolism. Plant Physiol 141:412–422PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kolotilin I, Kaldis A, Pereira EO et al (2013) Optimization of transplastomic production of hemicellulases in tobacco: effects of expression cassette configuration and tobacco cultivar used as production platform on recombinant protein yields. Biotechnol Biofuels 6:65PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kötting O, Kossmann J, Zeeman SC, Lloyd JR (2010) Regulation of starch metabolism: the age of enlightenment? Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:321–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kretschmer B, Bowyer C, Buckwell A (2012) EU Biofuel use and agricultural commodity prices: a review of the evidence base. Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Kurek I, Kawagoe Y, Jacob-Wilk D et al (2002) Dimerization of cotton fiber cellulose synthase catalytic subunits occurs via oxidation of the zinc-binding domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11109–11114PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B et al (1999) The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microbial Technol 24:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Long RC (1984) Edible tobacco protein. Crops Soil Mag 36:13–15Google Scholar
  26. Martin C, Fernandez T, Garcia R et al (2002) Preparation of hydrolysates from tobacco stalks and ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 18:857–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martin C, Fernandez T, Garcia A et al (2008) Wet oxidation pretreatment of tobacco stalks and orange waste for bioethanol production. Preliminary results. Cellul Chem Technol 42:429–434Google Scholar
  28. Molina A, Hervás-Stubbs S, Daniell H et al (2004) High-yield expression of a viral peptide animal vaccine in transgenic tobacco chloroplasts. Plant Biotechnol J 2:141–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (2008) Biofuel support policies: an economic assessment. 14:409–412Google Scholar
  30. Palmqvist E, Grage H, Meinander NQ, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1999) Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 63:46–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Petersen K, Bock R (2011) High-level expression of a suite of thermostable cell wall-degrading enzymes from the chloroplast genome. Plant Mol Biol 76:311–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pienkos PT, Zhang M (2009) Role of pretreatment and conditioning processes on toxicity of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. Cellulose 16:743–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rutz D, Janssen R (2007) Biofuel technolgy handbook. WIP Renewable EnergiesGoogle Scholar
  34. Saha BC, Cotta MA (2006) Ethanol production from alkaline peroxide pretreated enzymatically saccharified wheat straw. Biotechnol Progr 22:449–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Saha BC, Cotta MA (2010) Comparison of pretreatment strategies for enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of barley straw to ethanol. New Biotechnol 27:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sánchez OJ, Cardona CA (2008) Trends in biotechnological production of fuel ethanol from different feedstocks. Bioresour Technol 99:5270–5295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sanz-Barrio R, Fernández-San Millán A, Carballeda J et al (2012) Chaperone-like properties of tobacco plastid thioredoxins f and m. J Exp Bot 63:365–379PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sanz-Barrio R, Corral-Martínez P, Ancin M et al (2013) Overexpression of plastidial thioredoxin f leads to enhanced starch accumulation in tobacco leaves. Plant Biotechnol J 11:618–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sarkar N, Ghosh SK, Bannerjee S, Aikat K (2012) Bioethanol production from agricultural wastes: an overview. Renew Energy 37:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uncu ON, Cekmecelioglu D (2011) Cost-effective approach to ethanol production and optimization by response surface methodology. Waste Manage 31:636–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Beilen J, Möller R, Toonen M et al (2007) Industrial crop platforms for the production of chemicals and biopolymers. CPL Press, BerksGoogle Scholar
  42. Vanholme R, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W (2008) Lignin engineering. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:278–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Verma D, Kanagaraj A, Jin S et al (2010) Chloroplast-derived enzyme cocktails hydrolyse lignocellulosic biomass and release fermentable sugars. Plant Biotechnol J 8:332–350PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wildman SG (1979) Tobacco, a potential food crop. Crops Soil Mag 31:7–9Google Scholar
  45. Yang F, Mitra P, Zhang L et al (2013) Engineering secondary cell wall deposition in plants. Plant Biotechnol J 11:325–335PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhu JY, Pan XJ (2010) Woody biomass pretreatment for cellulosic ethanol production: technology and energy consumption evaluation. Bioresour Technol 101:4992–5002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ziegelhoffer T, Raasch JA, Austin-Phillips S (2009) Expression of Acidothermus cellulolyticus E1 endo-beta-1,4-glucanase catalytic domain in transplastomic tobacco. Plant Biotechnol J 7:527–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inmaculada Farran
    • 1
  • Alicia Fernandez-San Millan
    • 1
  • Maria Ancin
    • 1
  • Luis Larraya
    • 1
  • Jon Veramendi
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Producción Agraria, Instituto de AgrobiotecnologíaUniversidad Pública de Navarra-CSIC-Gobierno de NavarraPamplonaSpain

Personalised recommendations