Development and integration of EST–SSR markers into an established linkage map in switchgrass
- 371 Downloads
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a model cellulosic biofuel crop in the United States. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers are valuable resources for genetic mapping and molecular breeding. A large number of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of switchgrass are recently available in our sequencing project. The objectives of this study were to develop new SSR markers from the switchgrass EST sequences and to integrate them into an existing linkage map. More than 750 unique primer pairs (PPs) were designed from 243,600 EST contigs and tested for PCR amplifications, resulting in 538 PPs effectively producing amplicons of expected sizes. Of the effective PPs, 481 amplifying informative bands in NL94 were screened for polymorphisms in a panel consisting of NL94 and its seven first-generation selfed (S1) progeny. This led to the selection of 117 polymorphic EST–SSRs to genotype a mapping population encompassing 139 S1 individuals of NL94. Of 83 markers demonstrating clearly scorable alleles in the mapping population, 79 were integrated into a published linkage map, with three linked to accessory loci and one unlinked. The newly identified EST–SSR loci were distributed in 17 of 18 linkage groups with 27 (32.5 %) exhibiting distorted segregations. The integration of EST–SSRs aided in reducing the average marker interval (cM) to 3.7 from 4.2, and reduced the number of gaps (each >15 cM) to 10 from 23. Developing new EST–SSRs and constructing a higher density linkage map will facilitate quantitative trait locus mapping and provide a firm footing for marker-assisted breeding in switchgrass.
KeywordsSimple sequence repeat (SSR) Expressed sequence tag (EST) Linkage map Switchgrass
The authors thank the following funding sources and individuals for sponsoring and helping in this research: National Science Foundation award EPS 0814361; Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station; Yiwen Xiang, Yunwen Wang and Pu Feng.
- Casler M (2012) Switchgrass breeding, genetics, and genomic. In: Monti A (ed) Switchgrass: a valuable biomass crop for energy. Springer, London, pp 29–53Google Scholar
- Doyle JJ, Doyle JK (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
- Harushima Y, Yano M, Shomura A, Sato M, Shimano T, Kuboki Y, Yamamoto T, Lin SY, Antonio BA, Parco A, Kajiya H, Huang N, Yamamoto K, Nagamura Y, Kurata N, Khush GS, Sasaki T (1998) A high-density rice genetic linkage map with 2275 markers using a single F2 population. Genetics 148:479–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu LL, Wu YQ (2013) Molecular genetics and molecular breeding for bioenergy traits. In: Luo H, Wu YQ (eds) Compendium of bioenergy plants: switchgrass. CRC Press, FL (in press)Google Scholar
- Liu L, Wu Y, Wang Y, Samuels T (2012) A high-density simple sequence repeat-based genetic linkage map of switchgrass. G3-Genes Genomes Genet 2:357–370Google Scholar
- Van Ooijen JW (2006) JoinMap 4, software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps in experimental populations. Kyazma BV, WageningenGoogle Scholar
- Zhang JY, Lee YC, Torres-Jerez I, Wang M, Yin Y, Chou WC, He J, Shen H, Srivastava AC, Pennacchio C, Lindquist E, Grimwood J, Schmutz J, Xu Y, Sharma M, Sharma R, Bartley LE, Ronald PC, Saha MC, Dixon RA, Tang Y, Udvardi MK (2013) Development of an integrated transcript sequence database and a gene expression atlas for gene discovery and analysis in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Plant J 74:160–173. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12104 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar