Advertisement

Molecular Breeding

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 127–132 | Cite as

Development of breeder-friendly markers for selection of MIPS1 mutations in soybean

  • M. Luciana Rosso
  • Sarah A. Burleson
  • Laura M. Maupin
  • Katy Martin RaineyEmail author
Short communication

Abstract

Mutations in the d-myo-inositol 3-phosphate synthase 1 gene (MIPS1) in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cause modifications to seed phosphorus and carbohydrate content that improve the nutritional value of food and feed. Molecular markers are an efficient tool for breeding MIPS1 mutant germplasm due to reduced seed germination and field emergence potential. An F2 population segregating for the MIPS1 mutation found in experimental soybean line V99-5089 was used to develop breeder-friendly markers. Markers were validated in 88 advanced lines from 9 diverse pedigrees. Ten potential simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers, located on Gm11, from the new BARCSOYSSR_1.0 database were tested and four were polymorphic. BARCSOY_11_1495 was 93–97% effective for selecting the mutation. A KBiosciences Competitive Allele Specific PCR (KASPar) assay was developed to select directly for the V99-5089-derived MIPS1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mutation. The KASPar assay is simple and cost-effective compared to other SNP genotyping assays. The MIPS1 mutation in V99-5089 is likely to have occurred spontaneously. We describe a method of DNA extraction in soybean using a Geno/Grinder for fast and easy tissue maceration.

Keywords

BARCSOYSSR_1.0 Simple sequence repeat (SSR) KBiosciences Competitive Allele Specific PCR (KASPar) Low phytate (LP) d-myo-inositol 3-phosphate synthase 1 gene (MIPS1Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) Soybean (Glycine max

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the United Soybean Board for funding projects 8234, “Development of low phytate soybeans using genomic tools” and 8227, “The use of genomics to improve soybean meal digestibility and food quality”, that supported this research.

References

  1. Anderson BP, Fehr WR (2008) Seed source affects field emergence of low-phytate soybean lines. Crop Sci 48:929–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilyeu K, Zeng P, Zhang ZT, Coello P, Krishnan HB, Bailey A, Beuselinck PR, Polacco JC (2008) Quantitative conversion of phytate to inorganic phosphorus in soybeanexpressing a bacterial phytase. Plant Physiol 146:468–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burleson SA, Shang C, Rosso ML, Paupin LM, Rainey KM (2011) A high-throughput colorimetric method for selection of soybean phytate concentration. Crop Sci (submitted)Google Scholar
  4. Chen PS, Toribara TY, Warner H (1956) Microdetermination of phosphorus. Anal Chem 28:1756–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen W, Mingus J, Mammadov J, Backlund JE, Greene T, Thompson S, Kumpatla S (2010) KASPar: a simple and cost-effective system for SNP genotyping. In: Proceedings of plant and animal genomes XVII conference, San Diego, US, p 194Google Scholar
  6. Cregan PB, Jarvik T, Bush AL, Shoemaker RC, Lark KG, Kahler AL, Kaya N, VanToai TT, Lohnes DG, Chung J, Specht JE (1999) An integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Crop Sci 39:1464–1490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hitz WD, Carlson TJ, Kerr PS, Sebastian SA (2002) Biochemical and molecular characterization of a mutation that confers a decreased raffinosaccharide and phytic acid phenotype on soybean seeds. Plant Physiol 128:650–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huhn MR (2003) Inheritance of soluble oligosacharide content of soybean seeds. M.S. Virginia Polytechnic Institute State University, Blacksburg, VAGoogle Scholar
  9. Hymowitz T, Walker WM, Collins FI, Panczner J (1972) Stability of sugar content in soybean strains. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 3:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Israel DW, Taliercio E, Kwanyuen P, Burton JW, Dean L (2011) Inositol metabolism in developing seed of low and normal phytic acid soybean lines. Crop Sci 51:282–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly JM, Lincoln SE, Newberg L (1987) Mapmaker: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maupin LM, Rainey KM (2011) Improving emergence in modified phosphorus composition soybeans: genotypes, germplasm, environements, and selection. Crop Sci. (in press)Google Scholar
  13. Maupin LM, Rosso ML, Rainey KM (2011a) Environmental effects on soybean with modified phosphorus and sugar composition. Crop Sci 51:642–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maupin LM, Rosso ML, Shang C, Burleson S, Rainey KM (2011b) Evaluation of emergence and phosphorus content of an early generation soybean population with modified phosphorus and sugar composition. Crop Sci SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  15. Meis SJ, Fehr WR, Schnebly SR (2003) Seed source effect on field emergence of soybean lines with reduced phytate and raffinose saccharides. Crop Sci 43:1336–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raboy V, Dickinson D (1987) The timing and rate of phytic acid accumulation in developing soybean seeds. Plant Physiol 85:841–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Raboy V, Gerbasi PF, Young KA, Stoneberg SD, Pickett SG, Bauman AT, Murthy PPN, Sheridan WF, Ertl DS (2000) Origin and seed phenotype of maize low phytic acid 1–1 and low phytic acid 2–1. Plant Physiol 124:355–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saghai Maroof MA, Buss GR (2008) Low phytic acid, low stachyose, high sucrose soybean lines. US Patent 0199591 A1Google Scholar
  19. Saghai Maroof MA, Glover NM, Biyashev RM, Buss GR, Grabau EA (2009) Genetic basis of the low-phytate trait in the soybean line CX1834. Crop Sci 49:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scaboo AM, Pantalone VR, Walker DR, Boerma HR, West DR, Walker FR, Sams CE (2009) Confirmation of molecular markers and agronomic traits associated with seeds phytate content in two soybean RIL populations. Crop Sci 49:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sebastian S, Kerr PS, Pearlstein RW, Hitz WD (2000) Soybean germplasm with novel genes for improved digestibility. In: Drackley JK (ed) Soy in animal nutrition. Federation of Animal Sci Soc, Savoy, pp 56–74Google Scholar
  22. Shoemaker RC, Grant D, Olson T, Warren WC, Wing R, Yu Y, Kim H, Cregan P, Joseph B, Futrell-Griggs F, Nelson W, Davito J, Walker J, Wallis J, Kremitski C, Scheer D, Clifton SW, Graves T, Nguyen H, Wu X, Luo M, Dvorak J, Nelson R, Cannon S, Tomkins J, Shmutz J, Stacey G, Jackson S (2008) Microsatellite discovery from BAC end sequences and genetic mapping to anchor the soybean physical and genetic maps. Genome 51:294–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith TJ, Camper HM (1973) Registration of Essex soybean (Reg. No. 97). Crop Sci 13:495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Song QJ, Marek LF, Shoemaker RC, Lark KG, Concibido VC, Delannay X, Specht JE, Cregan PB (2004) A new integrated genetic linkage map of the soybean. Theor Appl Genet 109:122–128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Song QJ, Jia GF, Zhu YL, Grant D, Nelson RT, Hwang EY, Hyten DL, Cregan PB (2010) Abundance of SSR motifs and development of candidate polymorphic SSR markers (BARCSOYSSR_1.0) in soybean. Crop Sci 50:1950–1960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yuan FJ, Zhao HJ, Ren XL, Zhu ZL, Fu XJ, Shu QY (2007) Generation and characterization of two novel low phytate mutations in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor Appl Genet 115:945–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Luciana Rosso
    • 1
  • Sarah A. Burleson
    • 1
  • Laura M. Maupin
    • 2
  • Katy Martin Rainey
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Soil Environmental SciencesVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.Monsanto Co.PayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations