Molecular Breeding

, Volume 26, Issue 4, pp 583–593

Stability parameter and genotype mean estimates for drought stress effects on root and shoot growth of wild barley pre-introgression lines

  • Mohamed El Soda
  • Satya Swathi Nadakuduti
  • Klaus Pillen
  • Ralf Uptmoor
Article

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to select BC2-lines from a cross between Hordeum vulgare and H. vulgare ssp. spontaneum and to identify introgressed candidate regions responsible for a superior pre-flowering development across environments including drought stress conditions by using stability parameter and genotype mean estimates. Three experiments were carried out under controlled environmental conditions. Drought stress was induced by permanent suboptimal water supply, stress cycles in continuously drying soils, and increased transpiration demands by reducing relative humidity of the air. The environmental effects on shoot dry weight, leaf area, tiller number, and root lengths of 36 lines and the recurrent parent, the spring barley cultivar ‘Scarlett’ was tested in ten different conditions. Results showed that 11 genotypes responded significantly (P = 0.05) different from the recurrent parent in at least one of the measured traits. The introgressions of those lines were assigned to five genome regions, which have been suggested as QTL regions for related traits before. Regions on chromosome 4H influence tillering and one region each on 2H, 5H, and 7H probably has effects on shoot dry weight and leaf area. Introgressions on the mentioned regions increased trait values in every case. Leaf area was highly correlated to shoot dry weight and tiller number while the correlation between shoot dry weight and tiller number was not significant. A weak correlation was observed between tiller number and root lengths. Slopes of response curves of lines to increasing water shortage did not significantly differ from the population mean and from the recurrent parent. Results give hint that superior genotypes within the population develop well under both well-watered and drought stress conditions.

Keywords

Drought stress Wild barley Introgressed genome regions Leaf area Shoot dry weight Tillering Root lengths 

References

  1. Adda A, Sahnoune M, Kaid-Harch M, Merah O (2005) Impact of water deficit intensity on durum wheat seminal roots. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328:918–927CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson-Taylor G, Marshall C (1983) Root-tiller interrelationships in spring barley (Hordeum distichum (L.) Lam.). Ann Bot 51:47–58Google Scholar
  3. Arite T, Iwata H, Ohshima K, Maekawa M, Nakajima M, Kojima M, Sakakibara H, Kyozuka J (2007) DWARF10, an RMS1/MAX4/DAD1 ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice. Plant J 51:1019–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baum M, Grando S, Backes G, Jahoor A, Sabbagh A, Ceccarelli S (2003) QTLs for agronomic traits in the Mediterranean environment identified in recombinant inbred lines of the cross ‘Arta’ × H. spontaneum 41–1. Theor Appl Genet 107:1215–1225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Belford R, Klepper B, Rickman R (1987) Studies on intact root-shoot systems of field-grown winter wheat. II. Root and shoot development patterns as related to nitrogen fertilizer. Agron J 79:310–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben Haj Salah H, Tardieu F (1997) Control of leaf expansion rate of droughted maize plants under fluctuating evaporative demand. Plant Physiol 114:893–900Google Scholar
  7. Blaersild P, Granfeldt J (2003) Statistics with application in biology and geology. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  8. Borràs G, Romagosa I, van Eeuwijk F, Slafer GA (2009) Genetic variability in duration of pre-heading phases and relationships with leaf appearance and tillering dynamics in barley. Field Crops Res 113:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) Robust tests for the equality of variances. J Am Stat Soc 69:364–367Google Scholar
  10. Cairns JE, Audebert A, Mullins CE, Price AH (2009) Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root growth in upland rice (Oryza sativa L.) exposed to soil water-deficit in fields with contrasting soil properties. Field Crops Res 114:108–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chloupek O, Forster BP, Thomas WTB (2006) The effect of semi-dwarf genes on root system size in field grown barley. Theor Appl Genet 112:779–786CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dabbert T, Okagaki RJ, Cho S, Boddu J, Muehlbauer G (2009) The genetics of barley low-tillering mutants: absent lower laterals (als). Theor Appl Genet 118:1351–1360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Doebley J, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485–488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Eberhart SA, Russell WA (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6:36–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elberse I, Vanhala T, Turni J, Stam P, van Damme J, Tienderen P (2004) Quantitative trait loci affecting growth-related traits in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) grown under different levels of nutrient supply. Heredity 93:22–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis RP, Forster BP, Robinson D, Handley LL, Gordon DC, Russell J, Powell W (2000) Wild barley: a source of genes for crop improvement in the 21st century? J Exp Bot 51:9–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellis RP, Forster BP, Gordon DC, Handley LL, Keith RP, Lawrence P, Meyer R, Powell W, Robinson D, Scrimgeour CM, Young G, Thomas WTB (2002) Phenotype/genotype associations for yield and salt tolerance in a barley mapping population segregating for two dwarfing genes. J Exp Bot 53:1163–1176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Emebiri LC, Moody DB (2006) Heritable basis for some genotype environment stability statistics: inferences from QTL analysis of heading date in two-rowed barley. Field Crops Res 96:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feil B (1992) Breeding progress in small grain cereals—a comparison of old and modern cultivars. Plant Breed 108:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forster P, Ellis R, Moir J, Talame V, Sanguinet M, Tuberosa R, This D, Teulat-Merah B, Ahmed I, Mariy S, Bahri H, El Ouahabi M, Zoumarou-Wallis N, El-Fellah M, Ben Salem M (2004) Genotype and phenotype associations with drought tolerance in barley tested in North Africa. Ann Appl Biol 144:157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fukai S, Cooper M (1995) Development of drought-resistant cultivars using physio-morphological traits in rice. Field Crops Res 40:67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kebrom TH, Burson BL, Finlayson SA (2006) Phytochrome B represses Teosinte Branched1 expression and induces sorghum axillary bud outgrowth in response to light signals. Plant Physiol 140:1109–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraakman ATW, Niks RE, Van den Berg PMMM, Stam P, Van Eeuwijk FA (2004) Linkage disequilibrium mapping of yield and yield stability in modern spring barley cultivars. Genetics 168:435–446CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuraparthy V, Sood S, Chunneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Gill BS (2007) Identification and mapping of tiller inhibition gene (tin3) in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 114:285–294CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuraparthy V, Sood S, Gill BS (2008) Genomic targeting and mapping of tiller inhibition gene (tin3) of wheat using ESTs and synteny with rice. Funct Integr Genomics 8:33–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lacaze X, Hayes PM, Korol A (2009) Genetics of phenotypic plasticity: QTL analysis in barley, Hordeum vulgare. Heredity 102:163–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li XY, Qian Q, Fu Z, Wang Y, Xiong G, Zeng D, Wang X, Liu X, Teng S, Hiroshi F, Luo D, Han B, Li J (2003) Control of tillering in rice. Nature 422:618–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lin CS, Binns MR, Levkovitch LP (1986) Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci 26:894–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu G, Zeng R, Zhu H, Zhang Z, Ding X, Zhao F, Li W, Zhang G (2009) Dynamic expression of nine QTLs for tiller number detected with single segment substitution lines in rice. Theor Appl Genet 118:443–453CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Palta JA, Finery IRP, Rebetzke GJ (2008) Restricted-tillering wheat does not lead to greater investment in roots and early nitrogen uptake. Field Crops Res 104:52–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pipho HP (1999) Stability analysis using the SAS system. Agron J 91:154–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Quarry SA, Laurie DA, Zhu J, Lebreton C, Semikhodskii A, Steed A, Witsenboer H, Calestani C (1997) QTL analysis to study the association between leaf size and abscisic acid accumulation in droughted rice leaves and comparison across cereals. Plant Mol Biol 35:155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sahnoune M, Adda A, Soualem S, Kaid Harch M, Merah O (2004) Early water-deficit effects on seminal root morphology in barley. Comtes Rendus Biologies 327:389–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sambatti JBM, Caylor KK (2007) When is breeding for drought tolerance optimal if drought is random? New Phytol 175:70–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Takeda T, Suwa Y, Suzuki M, Kitano H, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M, Ueguchi C (2003) The OsTB1 gene negatively regulates lateral branching in rice. Plant J 33:513–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Teulat B, Monneveux P, Wery J, Borries C, Souyris I, Charrier A, This D (1997) Relationships between relative water content and growth parameters under water stress in barley: a QTL study. New Phytol 137:99–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Teulat M, Merah O, Souyris I, This D (2001) QTLs for agronomic traits from a Mediterranean barley progeny grown in several environments. Theor Appl Genet 103:774–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thiel T, Graner A, Waugh R, Grosse I, Close TJ, Stein N (2009) Evidence and evolutionary analysis of ancient whole genome duplication in barley predating the divergence from rice. BMC Evol Biol 9:209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Turner LB, Cairns AJ, Armstead IP, Thomas H, Humphreys MW, Humphries MO (2008) Does fructan have a functional role in physiological traits? Investigation by quantitative trait locus mapping. New Phytol 179:765–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Uptmoor R, Osei-Kwarteng M, Gürtler S, Stützel H (2009) Modelling the effects of drought stress on leaf development in a Brassica oleracea doubled haploid population using two-phase linear functions. J Am Soc Hort Sci 134:543–552Google Scholar
  41. von Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K (2004) Development of candidate introgression lines using an exotic barley accession. Theor Appl Genet 109:1736–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. von Korff M, Wang H, Léon J, Pillen K (2006) AB-QTL analysis in spring barley: II. Detection of favorable exotic alleles for agronomic traits introgressed from wild barley. Theor Appl Genet 112:1221–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Whabi A, Gregory P (1995) Growth and development of young roots of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. Ann Bot 75:533–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yadav R, Courtois B, Huang N, McLaren G (1997) Mapping genes controlling root morphology and root distribution in a doubled haploid population of rice. Theor Appl Genet 94:619–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zheng B, Yang L, Zhang W, Mao C, Wu Y, Yi K, Liu F, Wu P (2003) Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for rice root traits under different water supply conditions and comparative analysis across three populations. Theor Appl Genet 107:1505–1515CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Zheng BS, Le Gouis J, Daniel D, Brancourt-Hulmel M (2009) Optimal numbers of environments to assess slopes of joint regression for grain yield, grain protein yield and grain protein concentration under nitrogen constraint in winter wheat. Field Crops Res 113:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zou J, Zhang S, Zhang W, Chen Z, Zhai W, Zhao X, Pan X, Zhu L (2006) The rice HIGH-TILLERING DWARF1 encoding an ortholog of Arabidopsis MAX3 is required for negative regulation of the outgrowth of axillary buds. Plant J 48:687–698CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamed El Soda
    • 1
    • 2
  • Satya Swathi Nadakuduti
    • 1
    • 3
  • Klaus Pillen
    • 4
  • Ralf Uptmoor
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Biological Production SystemsLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.Laboratory of GeneticsWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Plant and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  4. 4.Institute of Agricultural and Nutritional SciencesMartin Luther University Halle-WittenbergHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations