Molecular Breeding

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 149–157

Marker-assisted selection for white mold resistance in common bean

Article

Abstract

A marker-assisted selection (MAS) study was conducted on two recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to test the effectiveness of MAS for resistance to white mold (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum). Markers for quantitative trait loci (QTL) on linkage groups B2 and B7 that were previously associated with resistance and plant architectural avoidance traits in the resistant parent Bunsi were chosen. In the Bunsi/Midland population 10 RILs included in the MAS selected group developed significantly less disease than the control group based on two years of field evaluation under white mold pressure. Growth habit had no significant effect on disease severity or incidence. In the Bunsi/Raven RIL population, disease scores in the MAS selected group were significantly lower than scores in the control group over two years. Additional progress in enhancing resistance to white mold was detected when yield and plant architecture were included in the selection process. Lower disease scores among RILs were observed when comparisons were made to RILs selected using MAS alone. Yield is an important trait that should be considered when selecting for resistance to white mold. Finally the potential of Bunsi as a genetic donor of QTL for white mold resistance was confirmed in both populations studied. This study supported the effectiveness of MAS to enhance selection for a complexly inherited trait such as resistance to white mold in common bean.

Keywords

Colocalization Disease avoidance Phaseolus vulgaris Plant architecture QTL Sclerotinia sclerotiorum 

Abbreviations

AFLP

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

DI

Disease incidence

DSI

Disease severity index

MAS

Marker assisted selection

RAPD

Random amplified polymorphic DNA

RILs

Recombinant inbred lines

ROX

Resistance to oxalate

QTL

Quantitative trait loci

References

  1. Asins MJ (2002) Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 121:281–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blad BL, Steadman JR, Weiss A (1978) Canopy structure and irrigation influence white mold disease and microclimate of dry edible beans. Phytopathology 68:1431–1437Google Scholar
  3. Coyne DP, Steadman JR, Anderson FN (1974) Effect of modified plant architecture of Great Northern dry bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris) on white mold severity and components of yield. Plant Disease Rptr 58:379–382Google Scholar
  4. Edwards MD, Page NJ (1994) Evaluation of marker-assisted selection through computer simulation. Theor Appl Genet 88:376–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ender M, Kelly JD (2005) Identification of QTL associated with white mold resistance in common bean. Crop Sci 45:2482–2490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Freyre R, Skroch PW, Geffroy V, Adam-Blondon AF, Shirmohamadali A, Johnson WC, Llaca V, Nodari RO, Pereira PA, Tsai SM, Tohme J, Dron M, Nienhuis J, Vallejos CE, Gepts P (1998) Towards and integrated linkage map of common bean. 4. Development of a core linkage map and alignment of RFLP maps. Theor Appl Genet 97:847–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hall R, Phillips LG (1996) Evaluation of parameters to assess resistance of white bean to white mold. Annu Rep Bean Improv Coop 39:306–307Google Scholar
  8. Kelly JD, Vallejo VA (2005) QTL analysis of multigenic disease resistance in plant breeding. In: Tuzun S, Bent E (eds) Multigenic and induced systemic resistance in plants. Springer, New York, pp 21–48Google Scholar
  9. Kelly JD, Hosfield GL, Varner GV, Uebersax MA, Haley SD, Taylor J (1994) Registration of Raven black bean. Crop Sci 34:1406–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerr ED, Steadman JR, Nelson LA (1978) Estimation of white mold disease reduction of yield and yield components of dry edible beans. Crop Sci 18:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Knapp SJ (1998) Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci 38:1164–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kolkman JM, Kelly JD (2000) An indirect test using oxalate to determinate physiological resistance to white mold in common bean. Crop Sci 40:281–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolkman JM, Kelly JD (2002) Agronomic traits affecting resistance to white mold in common bean. Crop Sci 42:693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kolkman JM, Kelly JD (2003) QTL conferring resistance and avoidance to white mold in common bean. Crop Sci 43:539–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743–756PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Lee M (1995) DNA markers and plant breeding programs. Adv Agron 55:265–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindhout P (2002) The perspectives of polygenic resistance in breeding for durable resistance. Euphytica 124:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miklas PN, Grafton KF (1992) Inheritance of partial resistance to white mold in inbred populations of dry bean. Crop Sci 32:943–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miklas PN, Delorme R, Johnson WC, Gepts P (2001) QTL conditioning physiological resistance and avoidance to white mold in dry bean. Crop Sci 41:309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miklas PN, Larsen KM, Terpstra KA, Hauf DC, Grafton KF, Kelly JD (2007) QTL analysis of ICA Bunsi-derived resistance to white mold in a pinto x navy bean cross. Crop Sci 47:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Park SJ (1993) Response of bush and upright plant type selections to white mold and seed yield of common beans grown in various row widths in southern Ontario. Can J Plant Sci 73:265–272Google Scholar
  22. Park SO, Coyne DP, Steadman JR, Skroch PW (2001) Mapping of QTL for resistance to white mold disease in common bean. Crop Sci 41:1253–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ribaut J-M, Jiang C, Hoisington D (2002) Simulation experiments on efficiencies of gene introgression by backcrossing. Crop Sci 42:557–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SAS Institute. 1995. The SAS system for Windows. Release 6.12. SAS Inst., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwartz HF, Steadman JR, Coyne DP (1978) Influence of Phaseolus vulgaris blossoming characteristics and canopy structure upon reaction to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Phytopathology 68:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schwartz HF, Casciano DH, Asenga JA, Wood DR (1987) Field measurement of white mold effects upon dry beans with genetic resistance or upright plant architecture. Crop Sci 27:699–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Van Berloo R, Stam P (2001) Simultaneous marker-assisted selection for multiple traits in autogamous crops. Theor Appl Genet 102:1107–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yousef GG, Juvik A (2001) Comparison on phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn. Crop Sci 41:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcio Ender
    • 1
  • Karolyn Terpstra
    • 1
  • James D. Kelly
    • 1
  1. 1.Crop and Soil SciencesMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations