Advertisement

Molecular Breeding

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 39–50 | Cite as

The identification and characterisation of alleles of sucrose phosphate synthase gene family III in sugarcane

  • C.L. McIntyre
  • M. Jackson
  • G.M. Cordeiro
  • O. Amouyal
  • S. Hermann
  • K.S. Aitken
  • F. Eliott
  • R.J. Henry
  • R.E. Casu
  • G.D. Bonnett
Original paper

Abstract

Little is known about the extent of allelic diversity of genes in the complex polyploid, sugarcane. Using sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS) Gene (SPS) Family III as an example, we have amplified and sequenced a 400 nt region from this gene from two sugarcane lines that are parents of a mapping population. Ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified within the 400 nt region of which seven were present in both lines. In the elite commercial cultivar Q165A, 10 sequence haplotypes were identified, with four haplotypes recovered at 9% or greater frequency. Based on SNP presence, two clusters of haplotypes were observed. In IJ76-514, a Saccharum officinarum accession, 8 haplotypes were identified with 4 haplotypes recovered at 13% or greater frequency. Again, two clusters of haplotypes were observed. The results suggest that there may be two SPS Gene Family III genes per genome in sugarcane, each with different numbers of different alleles. This suggestion is supported by sequencing results in an elite parental sorghum line, 403463-2-1, in which 4 haplotypes, corresponding to two broad types, were also identified. Primers were designed to the sugarcane SNPs and screened over bulked DNA from high and low Sucrose-containing progeny from a cross between Q165A and IJ76-514. The SNP frequency did not vary in the two bulked DNA samples, suggesting that these SNPs from this SPS gene family are not associated with variation in sucrose content. Using an ecotilling approach, two of the SPS Gene Family III haplotypes were mapped to two different linkage groups in homology group 1 in Q165A. Both haplotypes mapped near QTLs for increased sucrose content but were not themselves associated with any sugar-related trait.

Keywords

Sugarcane SNP Sucrose phosphate synthase Ecotilling Sugar Sorghum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken with partial funding from the Cooperative Research Centre for Sugar Industry Innovation Through Biotechnology. We also thank BSES Ltd and CSR Technical Field Department for sugarcane plant material and the Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries for sorghum plant material.

References

  1. Aitken K, Jackson PA, McIntyre CL (2005) Construction of a genetic linkage map of a sugarcane cultivar (Saccharum spp.) using AFLP and SSR markers. Theor Appl Genet 110:789–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aitken KS, Jackson PA, McIntyre CL (2006) QTL identified for sugar related traits in a sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivar × S. officinarum population. Theor Appl Genet 112:1306–1317Google Scholar
  3. Bertin P, Gallais A (2001) Genetic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in a set of recombinant inbred lines II␣– QTL detection and coincidences. Maydica 46:53–68Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Sugar Experiment Stations (1984) The standard laboratory manual for Australian sugar milling. Vol 1. Principles and practices. BSES, Brisbane AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  5. Bull TA, Glasziou KT (1963) The evolutionary significance of sugar accumulation in Saccharum. Aust J Biol Sci 16:737–742Google Scholar
  6. Castledon CK, Aoki N, Gillespie VJ, MacRae E, Quick WP, Buchner P, Foyer CH, Furbank RT, Lunn JE (2004) Evolution and function of the sucrose-phosphate synthase gene families in wheat and other grasses. Plant Physiol 135:1753–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Causse M, Rocher J-P, Pelleschi S, Barriere Y, de Vienne D, Prioul J-L (1995) Sucrose-phosphate synthase: an enzyme with heterotic activity correlated with maize growth. Crop Sci 35:995–1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Comai L, Young K, Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Greene EA, Codomo CA, Enns LC, Johnson JE, Burtner C, Odden AR, Henikoff S (2004) Efficient discovery of DNA polymorphisms in natural populations by Ecotilling. Plant J 37:778–786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cordeiro GM, Eliott F, McIntyre CL, Casu RE, Henry RJ (2006) Characterisation of single nucleotide polymorphisms in sugarcane ESTs. Theor App Genet (in press)Google Scholar
  10. Cronn R, Cedroni M, Hasselkorn T, Grover C, Wendel JF (2002) PCR-mediated recombination in amplification products derived from polyploid cotton. Theor App Genet 104:482–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dȁ9Hont A, Grivet L, Feldmann P, Rao S, Berding N, Glaszmann J-C (1996) Characterization of the double genome structure of modern sugarcane cultivars (Saccharum spp.) by molecular cytogenetics. Mol Gen Genet 250:45–413Google Scholar
  12. Dufour P, Deu M, Grivet L, Dȁ9Hont A, Paulet F, Bouet A, Lanaud C, Glaszmann J-C, Hamon P (1996) Construction of a composite sorghum genome map and comparison with sugarcane, a related complex polyploid. Theor Appl Genet 94:409–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grivet L, Dȁ9Hont A, Dufour P, Hamon P, Roques D, Glaszmann J-C (1994) Comparative genome mapping of sugar cane with other species within the Andropogoneae Tribe. Heredity 73:500–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grivet L, Dȁ9Hont A, Roques D, Feldmann P, Lanaud C, Glaszmann JC (1996) RFLP mapping in cultivated sugarcane (Saccharum spp.): genome organization in a highly polyploid and aneuploid interspecific hybrid. Genetics 142:987–1000PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grivet L, Glaszmann JC, Arruda P (2001) Sequence polymorphism from EST data in sugarcane: a fine analysis of 6-phophogluconate dehydrogenase genes. Genetics and Mol Biol 24:161–167Google Scholar
  16. Grivet L, Glaszmann JC, Vincentz M, da Silva F, Arruda P (2003) ESTs as a source for sequence polymorphism discovery in sugarcane: example of the Adh genes. Theor Appl Genet 106:190–197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoisington DA (1992) Laboratory protocols. CIMMYT Applied molecular genetics laboratory. Mexico, D.F. CIMMYTGoogle Scholar
  18. Ishimaru K, Ono K, Kashiwagi T (2004) Identification of a new gene controlling plant height in rice using the candiate-gene approach. Planta 218:399–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leloir LF, Cardini CE (1955) The biosynthesis of sucrose phosphate. J Biol Chem 214:157–165PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Ming R, Liu SC, Bowers JE, Moore PH, Irvine JE et al (2002) Construction of a Saccharum consensus genetic␣map from two interspecific crosses. Crop Sci 42:570–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oleykowski CA, Mullins CRB, Godwin AK, Yeung AT (1998) Mutation detection using a novel plant endonuclease. Nucleic Acids Res 26:4597–4602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Panje RR, Babu CN (1960) Studies in Saccharum spontaneum. Distribution and geographical association of chromosome numbers. Cytologia 25:152–172Google Scholar
  23. Rocher JP, Prioul JL, Lecharny A, Reyss A, Joussaume M (1989) Genetic variability in carbon fixation, sucrose-P-synthase and ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase in maize plants of differeing growth rate. Plant Physiol 89:416–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rossi M, Arujo P, Paulet F, Garsmeur O, Dias V, Hui C, Van Sluys MA, Dȁ9Hont A (2003) Genome distribution and characterization of EST derived sugarcane resistance gene analogs. Mol Gen Genom 269:406–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarquis JI, Gonzalez H, Sanchez de Jimenez E, Dunlap JR (1998) Physiological traits associated with mass selection for improved yield in a maize population. Field Crops Res 56:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seneweerra SP, Basra AS, Barlow EW, Conroy JP (1995) Diurnal regulation of leaf blade elongation in rice by CO2. Plant Physiol 108:1471–1477Google Scholar
  27. Shailaja K, Rathore M, Puri N, Yadav D, Singh NK (2002) PCR amplification of the hypervariable region of wheat triticin genes. J Cereal Sci 35:129–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sobral BWS, Braga DPV, LaHood ES, Keim P (1994) Phylogenetic analysis of chloroplast restriction enzyme site mutations in the Saccharinae Griseb. Subtribe of the Andropoganeae Dumort. Tribe Theor Appl Genet 87:843–853Google Scholar
  29. Till BJ, Reynolds SH, Weil C, Springer N, Burtner C, Young K, Bowers E, Codomo CA, Enns LC, Odden AR, Greene EA, Comai L, Henikoff S (2004) Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING. BMC Plant Biol 4(12):28 July 2004Google Scholar
  30. Walsh PS, Erlich HA, Higuchi R (1992) Preferential PCR amplification of alleles: mechanisms and solutions. PCR Methods Appl 1:241–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang DM, Shen B, Liu CJ (2006) False positives – a persistent problem in screening bacterial artificial chromosome library based on PCR amplification in hexaploid wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genome (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Worrall AC, Bruneau JM, Summerfelt K, Boersig M, Voelker TA (1991) Expression of maize sucrose phosphate synthase in tomato alters leaf carbohydrate partitioning. Plant Cell 3:1121–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhu YJ, Komor E, Moore PH (1997) Sucrose accumulation in the sugarcane stem is regulated by the difference between the activities of soluble acid invertase and sucrose phosphate synthase. Plant Physiol 115:609–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.L. McIntyre
    • 1
    • 4
  • M. Jackson
    • 1
    • 4
  • G.M. Cordeiro
    • 2
    • 4
  • O. Amouyal
    • 2
    • 4
  • S. Hermann
    • 3
    • 4
  • K.S. Aitken
    • 1
    • 4
  • F. Eliott
    • 2
    • 4
  • R.J. Henry
    • 2
    • 4
  • R.E. Casu
    • 1
    • 4
  • G.D. Bonnett
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.CSIRO Plant IndustrySt LuciaAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Plant Conservation and GeneticsSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  3. 3.School of Integrative BiologyUniversity of QueenslandIndooroopillyAustralia
  4. 4.CRC for Sugar Industry Innovation through BiotechnologyUniversity of QueenslandSt LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations