Advertisement

Molecular Breeding

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 75–85 | Cite as

Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding

  • D.G. Bonnett
  • G.J. Rebetzke
  • W. Spielmeyer
Article

Abstract

Although molecular markers allow more accurate selection in early generations than conventional screens, large numbers can make selection impracticable while screening in later generations may provide little or no advantage over conventional selection techniques. Investigation of different crossing strategies and consideration of when to screen, what proportion to retain and the impacts of dominant vs. codominant marker expression revealed important choices in the design of marker-assisted selection programs that can produce large efficiency gains. Using F2 enrichment increased the frequency of selected alleles allowing large reductions in minimum population size for recovery of target genotypes (commonly around 90%) and/or selection at a greater number of loci. Increasing homozygosity by inbreeding from F2 to F2:3 also reduced population size by around 90% in some crosses with smaller incremental reductions in subsequent generations. Backcrossing was found to be a useful strategy to reduce population size compared with a biparental population where one parent contributed more target alleles than the other and was complementary to F2 enrichment and increasing homozygosity. Codominant markers removed the need for progeny testing reducing the number of individuals that had to be screened to identify a target genotype. However, although codominant markers allow target alleles to be fixed in early generations, minimum population sizes are often so large in F2 that it is not efficient to do so at this stage. Formulae and tables for calculating genotypic frequencies and minimum population sizes are provided to allow extension to different breeding systems, numbers of target loci, and probabilities of failure. Principles outlined are applicable to implementation of markers for both quantitative trait loci (QTL) and major genes.

Keywords

Breeding strategy Marker-assisted selection (MAS) Molecular marker Population genetics Population size 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bariana, H.S., McIntosh, R.A. 1993Cytogenetics studies in wheat XIV. Location of rust resistance genes in VPM1 and their genetic linkage with other disease resistance genes in chromosome 2AGenome36476482Google Scholar
  2. Ellis, M.H., Spielmeyer, W., Gale, K., Rebetzke, G.J., Richards, R.A. 2002Perfect markers for the Rht-B1bRht-D1b dwarfing mutations in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Theor. Appl. Genet.10510381042Google Scholar
  3. Falconer, D.S., Mackay, T.F.C. 1996Introduction to Quantitative Genetics4Longman Group LtdEssex, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanson, W.D. 1959Minimum family sizes for the planning of genetic experimentsAgron. J.51711715Google Scholar
  5. Howes, N.K., Woods, S.M., Townley-Smith, T.F. 1998Simulations and practical problems of applying multiple marker assisted selection and doubled haploids to wheat breeding programsEuphytica100225230Google Scholar
  6. Koebner, R.M.D., Summers, R.W. 200321st century wheat breeding: plot selection or plate detection?Trends Biotechnol.215963Google Scholar
  7. Korzun, V., Röder, M.S., Ganal, M.W., Worland, A.J., Law, C.N. 1998Genetic analysis of the dwarfing gene (Rht8) in wheat. I. Molecular mapping of Rht8 on the short arm of chromosome 2D of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum)Theor. Appl. Genet.9611041109Google Scholar
  8. H. Kuchel, P. Warner, R.L. Fox, K. Chalmers, N. Howes, P. Langridge, S.P. Jefferies. 2003. Whole genome based marker assisted selection strategies in wheat breedingProc. 10th International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Paestum, Italy, 1–6 SeptemberVol. 1,pp. 144--147.Google Scholar
  9. Li, C.C. 1955Population GeneticsThe University of Chicago PressUSAGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma, W., Zhang, W., Gale, K.R. 2003Multiplex-PCR typing of high molecular weight glutenin alleles in wheatEuphytica1345160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. R.A. McIntosh, G.E. Hart, K.M. Devos, M.D. Gale, W.D. Rogers. 1998.Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. Proc. 9th International Wheat Genetics Symposium Saskatchewan, Canada Saskatoon. August Vol. 5. pp. 2--7Google Scholar
  12. Ogbonnaya, F.C., Subrahmanyam, N.C., Moullet, O., de Majnik, J., Eagles, H.A., Brown, J.S., Eastwood, R.F., Kollmorgan, J., Appels, R., Lagudah, E.S. 2001Diagnostic DNA markers for cereal cyst nematode resistance in bread wheatAust. J. Agric. Res.5213671374Google Scholar
  13. Rebetzke, G.J., Richards, R.A. 2000Gibberellic acid-sensitive dwarfing genes reduce plant height to increase kernel number and grain yield of wheatAust. J. Agric. Res.55235245Google Scholar
  14. Sedcole, J.R. 1977Number of plants necessary to recover a traitCrop Sci.17667668Google Scholar
  15. Spielmeyer, W., Sharp, P.W., Lagudah, E.S. 2003Identification and validation of markers linked to broad-spectrum stem rust resistance gene Sr2 in wheatCrop Sci.43333336Google Scholar
  16. Zhang, W., Gianibelli, M.C., Rampling, L.R., Gale, K.R. 2004Characterisation and marker development for low molecular weight glutenin genes from Glu-A3 alleles of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum. L)Theor. Appl. Genet.10814091419Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Plant IndustryCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.GraingeneGriffithAustralia

Personalised recommendations