Advertisement

Motivation and Emotion

, Volume 43, Issue 6, pp 917–928 | Cite as

The power motive as a predictor of receptiveness to nonverbal behavior in sport

  • Philip FurleyEmail author
  • Geoffrey Schweizer
  • Mirko Wegner
Original Paper
  • 89 Downloads

Abstract

The study tested the hypothesis that the implicit power motive is positively associated with receptiveness to nonverbal cues related to submissiveness in sports. Participants’ (N = 156) implicit and explicit power motives were measured. Receptiveness to nonverbal dominance and submissiveness cues was measured using videos from sports competitions depicting elite athletes who are supposed to send nonverbal signals dependent on the current score. Participants’ task was estimating if athletes were currently trailing or leading. Participants’ estimates were compared to the actual score in the video scenes. Results suggest that participants scoring high in the implicit power motive were more receptive towards submissive cues, but not more receptive towards dominant cues. This finding suggests that the implicit power motive is associated with a greater receptiveness for cues related to submissiveness.

Keywords

Sport Emotion expression Nonverbal behavior Thin slices Implicit power motive 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Samuel Gähwiler, Maurice Heylen, and Wolfgang Walther for helping with the data collection and programming in this study.

Funding

No external funding supported the present research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

Disclosure

The authors declare that (1) (a) the total number of excluded observations and (b) the reasons for making these exclusions have been reported in this manuscript; (2) that all independent variables or manipulations, whether successful or failed, have been reported in the manuscript; (3) that all dependent variables or measures that were analyzed for this article’s target research question have been reported in in the manuscript; (4) that (a) how sample size was determined has been reported in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Research involving human participants and/or animals and informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aguinis, H., Simonsen, M. M., & Pierce, C. A. (1998). Effects of nonverbal behavior on perceptions of power bases. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138, 455–469.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549809600400.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2006). Power, optimism, and risk-taking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 511–536.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C., John, O. P., & Keltner, D. (2012). The personal sense of power. Journal of Personality, 80(2), 313–344.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00734.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, C. R. (1994). Power, dominance, and social interaction. In M. L. Knapp & R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 450–507). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Burgoon, J. K., & Hoobler, G. D. (2002). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 240–299). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L., & Koch, P. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communications Monographs, 65, 308–335.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759809376456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T. H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M.,… & Altmejd, A. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 637–644.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donhauser, P. W., Rösch, A. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2015). The implicit need for power predicts recognition speed for dynamic changes in facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 714–721.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-015-9484-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ekman, P. (2009). Darwin’s contributions to our understanding of emotional expressions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3449–3451.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1–28). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldt, L. S. (1961). The use of extreme groups to test for the presence of a relationship. Psychometrika, 26, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiedler, K. (2011). Voodoo correlations are everywhere—Not only in neuroscience. Perspectives on Psychological Science., 6, 163–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Furley, P. (2019). What modern sports competitions can tell us about human nature. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 138–155.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618794912.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Furley, P., Dicks, M., & Memmert, D. (2012). Nonverbal behavior in soccer: The influence of dominant and submissive body language on the impression formation and expectancy of success of soccer players. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34, 61–82.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.1.61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Furley, P., Schnuerch, R., & Gibbons, H. (2016). The winner takes it all: Event-related brain potentials reveal enhanced motivated attention toward athletes’ nonverbal signals of leading. Social Neuroscience, 35, 316–320.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1182586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2014a). “I’m pretty sure that we will win!” The influence of score-related nonverbal behavioral changes on the confidence in winning a basketball game. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 35, 316–320.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2013-0199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2014b). The expression of victory and loss: Estimating who’s leading or trailing from nonverbal cues in sports. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 13–29.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-013-0168-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2016). In a flash: Thin slice judgment accuracy of leading and trailing in sports. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 83–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-015-0225-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furley, P., & Schweizer, G. (2018). Body language in sport. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Gröpel, P., Schöne, L., & Wegner, M. (2015). Implizite und explizite Motive von Leistungs- und Freizeitsporttreibenden [The implicit and explicit motives of high-performance and recreational athletes]. Zeitschrift für Sportpsychologie, 22(1), 6–19.  https://doi.org/10.1026/1612-5010/a000133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall, J. A., Coats, E. J., & LeBeau, L. S. (2005). Nonverbal behavior and the vertical dimension of social relations: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 898–924.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.898.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall, J. A., & Friedman, G. B. (1999). Status, gender, and nonverbal behavior: A study of structured interactions between employees of a company. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1082–1091.  https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672992512002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson, D. N. (1967). Personality research form manual. New York: Research Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  27. Keltner, D. (2016). The power paradox: How we gain and lose influence. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. Köllner, M. G., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2014). Meta-analytic evidence of low convergence between implicit and explicit measures of the needs for achievement, affiliation, and power. Frontiers in Psychology: Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 826.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lombardo, M. P. (2012). On the evolution of sport. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Mason, M. F., Zhang, S., & Dyer, R. L. (2010). Male susceptibility to attentional capture by power cues. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 482–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE) and neutral faces (JACNeuF)[Slides]. San Francisco: Author.Google Scholar
  32. Matsumoto, D., & Hwang, H. S. (2012). Evidence for a nonverbal expression of triumph. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 520–529.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazur, A. (2005). Biosociology of dominance and deference. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  34. McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge Univeresity Press.Google Scholar
  36. McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychological Review, 96, 690–702.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Some methodological issues in assessing attentional biases for threatening faces in anxiety: A replication study using a modified version of the probe detection task. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 595–604.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00158-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan, C., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The thematic apperception test. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 34, 289–306.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurpsyc.1935.02250200049005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morrison, E. W., See, K. E., & Pan, C. (2015). An approach-inhibition model of employee silence: The joint effects of personal sense of power and target openness. Personnel Psychology, 68, 547–580.  https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pang, J. S., & Schultheiss, O. C. (2005). Assessing implicit motives in U.S. college students: Effects of picture type and position, gender and ethnicity, and cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 280–294.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_04.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Psychology Software Tools. (2007). E-Prime (Version 2.0) [Computer software]. Pittsburgh, PA: Author.Google Scholar
  43. Raihala, C., & Hansen, G. (2019). Power stress in primary school children. Motivation and Emotion, 43, 82–92.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9724-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rule, N. O., Adams, R. B., Jr., Ambady, N., & Freeman, J. B. (2012). Perceptions of dominance following glimpses of faces and bodies. Perception, 41, 687–706.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p7023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J. A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145–165.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JONB.0000039647.94190.21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schultheiss, O. C. (2008). Implicit motives. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 603–633). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  47. Schultheiss, O., & Brunstein, J. (2010). Implicit motives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schultheiss, O. C., & Hale, J. A. (2007). Implicit motives modulate attentional orienting to facial expressions of emotion. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 13–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9042-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schultheiss, O. C., & Pang, J. S. (2007). Measuring implicit motives. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 322–344). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  50. Schultheiss, O. C., Wirth, M. M., Waugh, C. E., Stanton, S. J., Meier, E. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2008). Exploring the motivational brain: effects of implicit power motivation on brain activation in response to facial expressions of emotion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 3, 333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsn030.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Schultheiss, O. C., Yankova, D., Dirlikov, B., & Schad, D. J. (2009). Are implicit and explicit motive measures statistically independent? A fair and balanced test using the picture story exercise and a cue-and response-matched questionnaire measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 72–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484456.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Schweizer, G., & Furley, P. (2016). Reproducible research in sport and exercise psychology: The role of sample sizes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 23, 114–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simons, D. J. (2014). The value of direct replication. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 76–80.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514755.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Spangler, W. D. (1992). Validity of questionnaire and TAT measures of need for achievement: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 140–154.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stoeckart, P. F., Strick, M., Bijleveld, E., & Aarts, H. (2017). The implicit power motive predicts action selection. Psychological Research, 81, 560–570.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0768-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Stoeckart, P. F., Strick, M., Bijleveld, E., & Aarts, H. (2018). The implicit power motive predicts decisions in line with perceived intentionality. Motivation and Emotion, 42, 309–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9687-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Stumpf, H., Angleitner, A., Wieck, T., Jackson, D. N., & Beloch-Till, H. (1985). Deutsche personality research form (PRF) [German Personality Research Form]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  58. Thrash, T. M., Maruskin, L. A., & Martin, C. C. (2012). Implicit-explicit motive congruence. In New York (Ed.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of human motivation, RM Ryan (pp. 141–156). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tracy, J. L., & Matsumoto, D. (2008). The spontaneous display of pride and shame: Evidence for biologically innate nonverbal displays. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 11655–11660.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0802686105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang, J., Liu, L., Yang, Q., Zhang, J., & Yan, J. H. (2017). The implicit need for power predicts recognition memory for anger faces: An electrophysiological study. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 207–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.01.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wegner, M., Schüler, J., Scheuermann, K. S., Machado, S., & Budde, H. (2015). The implicit power motive and adolescents’ salivary cortisol responses to acute psychosocial stress and exercise in school. CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets, 14, 1219–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wegner, M., Sieber, V., & Schüler, J. (2014). Implicit motives of elite athletes, sport students, and non-sport students: Power, affiliation, and achievement. In R. Morisson (Ed.), Motivation: Psychology, strategies and impact on performance (pp. 109–124). New York: Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Wegner, M., Wieland, A., & Mempel, G. (2017). The implicit fear of power motive is associated with practice time in elite karateka and tennis players. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(3), 258–272.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2015.1094116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  65. Winter, D. G. (1994). Manual for scoring motive imagery in running text (Version 4.2). Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Furley
    • 1
    Email author
  • Geoffrey Schweizer
    • 2
  • Mirko Wegner
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Training and Computer Science in SportGerman Sport UniversityCologneGermany
  2. 2.University of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  4. 4.Universität BernBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations